So, there were at least 100 "Female" boxers at the 2024 Olympics in 6 weight classes. Of these, two were XY males who had been banned by the International Boxing Association but were permitted to fight in the Olympics because they were determined to have no biological advantage. Of course the puff piece below doesn't discuss that the two males had male chromosomes and there was no evidence of a physical advantage except for the fact that they looked like men. Now, if there wasn't a physical advantage, the odds of one of the males winning a gold in a weight class would have been been one out of 16.7 (assuming 100/6). The odds of both males winning gold would have been far higher. And yet both males won gold medals.
Comments
Gaslighting pure and simple. Tested. XY chromosomes. Discussion is over. Everything else is just blathering from agenda driven betas.
So, you do need to be a biologist.
I'm not a biologist. I know what XY chromosomes do. Your side is lying about XY chromosomes not providing a physical advantage.
She fought as the sex assigned at birth. Isn't that what "your side" wants?
H as a proponent of men beating up women so he can support his political party is on brand.
If Democrats come out against it next year he will support that position, too. Same story with this squish for years. No intrinsic value system, he just thinks what his leaders tell him to think.
He had the chromosomes at birth
"She" is intersex. It's not the same thing and it's rare. It's too bad for her?, but it's unfair to women.
You come closest to my own view of the matter. Both extremes seem too invested in making complex things simple.
Yeah that sucks for him. But reality is that once you get to like 8th grade or so you have to good enough to make teams in order to play. Playing competitive sports isn't a right or guarantee by any stretch.
Exactly
What is complex about this? One third of the women's boxing golds were won by the two XY males out of over a hundred women competitors. That isn't a statistical insignificant advantage.
Exactly.... and it's dangerous as well....
You come closest to my own view of the matter. Both extremes seem too invested in making complex things simple.
“Sex assigned at birth” is you making a complex thing “simple,” you fucking moron. The people saying that doesn’t really make that person a female due to chromosomes are debating the complexity of it, Adolph.
Dumbshit contradicts himself within a few hours yet again.
Mocking you for "sex assigned at birth" hypocrisy isn't quite the self-own you think it is, Marge.
If you want a date just go ask him out.
Often Mall Cop has nothing to contribute, so he does.
Has more truth than anything you've put up Laverne.
You posted it, Retard. How is that mocking me at all, you Dipshit?
All you ever add are the thoughts of a simple person. When you try to get nuanced, you get shredded until you resort to calling someone “Gladys” or some other weird term of affection. Or, in this instance, pretend your simpleton post is to mock someone that said nothing about the “assigned birth” line your Dem leaders are parroting to fool retards just like you.
That's the thing about putting your dick out there. Might get it cut off