This entire thread you started pertains to 40 years ago and Reagan. It’s your topic to begin with, you AssBirth, and Trump has more support than any President since Reagan or possibly HW Bush. You’re just posting nonsense.
Define "support". Trump lost the popular vote to Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. He lost the last election despite an incumbent advantage. He had the highest Gallup disapproval since Nixon. Trump is quite unpopular. What am I missing?
You didn't directly reply to HH. It was directed to "you losers". I'm one of those. It was a clownin' comment so I replied to you. Westlinn replied to me. New here? Keep up.
I now see that you're speaking about the most recent comment. My bad my bad. You made another dumb statement I had to reply to. My bad. If you stopped doing that, I'd shut up.
Answer my question about your claim of Trump having the most support of any president since Reagan, or maybe HW, if you want. Or not. IDGAF. I'm enjoying the delusion either way.
Answer my question, says the cult member who has ignored mine on how Democrats removing Trump from state ballots “Protected Democracy.”
Or, did you losers give up that one after the biggest donors in your Leftist cult chose, without any debate or citizen voting, the nominee you will unquestionably vote for now?
That question has been retarded since you first uttered it, and you may be autistic OCD for repeating it incessantly. It's a non-starter, just like the GOPs threats to keep Biden off the ballot. This is politics. I let you run with the line while I cackle like Kamala. Nobody else responded either for the same reason. Let it go, bro. Trump is on the ballot everywhere.
Stay on topic. I asked a question about your claim re: Trump's historically large support, most of any president since Reagan. You don't have to answer it. Your deflection has already answered it. There's nothing that backs up that statement. Trump is deeply unpopular. The Tug is a sad little microcosm that doesn't represent America for shit.
Asking him how removing leading opposition candidates from state ballots “Protects Democracy” is yet another topic too “in the weeds” for this dipshit @CallMeBigErn to answer.
Just another intellectual weakling. Sad. Had a decent Tug start until asked to defend the basic platform of Democrats and also his unrealistic Green Energy bullshit.
Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Perhaps Trump shouldn't have fucked around and allowed the 14th amendment to even be a question. Protect democracy, eh? The 14th, section 3 is there to protect democracy. There's real questions surrounding Trump there. Maybe not enough insurrection evidence as the eventual 9-0 ruling showed, but Jan 6 and Trump's efforts were certainly enough to snag federal charges and have the 14th topic broached by states, at the very least.
Trump has proven himself a threat to democratic processes. That all happened. It isn't made up out of thin air. FAFO.
Quit crying about it. It's over. Teflon Don is on the ballot. Move on.
I love these examples where people who always cry for state's rights and against federal regulation/intervention (Roe, public lands, fuckin Ammon Bundy, etc) immediately turn against state's rights when it doesn't suit them. Colorado's insurrection clause ballot challenge being a good example. Whether it was a good case or not is irrelevant. It's the political narrative. There's better examples than that one.
Bey dumb fuck, I asked how Democrats removing Trump from ballots “Protects Democracy” for a federal election. Your states’ rights gibberish is just stupid in response to the question asked of you.
Comments
No one likes actual conservatives and your not one despite no one liking you
Reagan won with democrats votes. Same as Trump
Not yours, though. You and Atl hated him.
Is that a point?
You hate him now and then
This entire thread you started pertains to 40 years ago and Reagan. It’s your topic to begin with, you AssBirth, and Trump has more support than any President since Reagan or possibly HW Bush. You’re just posting nonsense.
Pretending today's GOP is the party of Reagan is exactly like you and Daddy pretending to be followers of Jesus Christ. Unmitigated bullshit.
Populism » Globalist RINOs who allowed open borders, masks, and trillions more in debt
Define "support". Trump lost the popular vote to Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. He lost the last election despite an incumbent advantage. He had the highest Gallup disapproval since Nixon. Trump is quite unpopular. What am I missing?
Just so dishonest.
Homerun.
Pretending Reagans GOP is anything like Bush Jr. And big government neocons is FS. No wonder Mello is cheering you on.
I was replying to a post about GOP presidents to Lionel Hutzky, @CallMeBigErn, and was not responding to you, Fatty.
Learn how to read. Nice information I guess if your point was nonstop propaganda from Leftists in all forms of media works.
You didn't directly reply to HH. It was directed to "you losers". I'm one of those. It was a clownin' comment so I replied to you. Westlinn replied to me. New here? Keep up.
@EverettChris
I now see that you're speaking about the most recent comment. My bad my bad. You made another dumb statement I had to reply to. My bad. If you stopped doing that, I'd shut up.
Answer my question about your claim of Trump having the most support of any president since Reagan, or maybe HW, if you want. Or not. IDGAF. I'm enjoying the delusion either way.
Answer my question, says the cult member who has ignored mine on how Democrats removing Trump from state ballots “Protected Democracy.”
Or, did you losers give up that one after the biggest donors in your Leftist cult chose, without any debate or citizen voting, the nominee you will unquestionably vote for now?
That question has been retarded since you first uttered it, and you may be autistic OCD for repeating it incessantly. It's a non-starter, just like the GOPs threats to keep Biden off the ballot. This is politics. I let you run with the line while I cackle like Kamala. Nobody else responded either for the same reason. Let it go, bro. Trump is on the ballot everywhere.
Stay on topic. I asked a question about your claim re: Trump's historically large support, most of any president since Reagan. You don't have to answer it. Your deflection has already answered it. There's nothing that backs up that statement. Trump is deeply unpopular. The Tug is a sad little microcosm that doesn't represent America for shit.
Asking him how removing leading opposition candidates from state ballots “Protects Democracy” is yet another topic too “in the weeds” for this dipshit @CallMeBigErn to answer.
Just another intellectual weakling. Sad. Had a decent Tug start until asked to defend the basic platform of Democrats and also his unrealistic Green Energy bullshit.
Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Perhaps Trump shouldn't have fucked around and allowed the 14th amendment to even be a question. Protect democracy, eh? The 14th, section 3 is there to protect democracy. There's real questions surrounding Trump there. Maybe not enough insurrection evidence as the eventual 9-0 ruling showed, but Jan 6 and Trump's efforts were certainly enough to snag federal charges and have the 14th topic broached by states, at the very least.
Trump has proven himself a threat to democratic processes. That all happened. It isn't made up out of thin air. FAFO.
Quit crying about it. It's over. Teflon Don is on the ballot. Move on.
I love these examples where people who always cry for state's rights and against federal regulation/intervention (Roe, public lands, fuckin Ammon Bundy, etc) immediately turn against state's rights when it doesn't suit them. Colorado's insurrection clause ballot challenge being a good example. Whether it was a good case or not is irrelevant. It's the political narrative. There's better examples than that one.
Let the state's decide!
Nonono, that's not what we meant!
Hypocrisy in spades.
Ok.
.
Bey dumb fuck, I asked how Democrats removing Trump from ballots “Protects Democracy” for a federal election. Your states’ rights gibberish is just stupid in response to the question asked of you.