Umm Vance is brilliant. I am not sure if I am reading your post correctly, if not my apologies, but the man is straight up smarter than anyone you or I probably know. Not only is he smart but he is self made with zero help from his skin color or sex. He is 39 and already very accomplished as a business owner and investor. He did all that after having been raised by a drugged out mother and a very rough grandmother.
He might not have been my first pick but that guy has come through a lot to get where he is. Private school Headboard, with two professor parents, has had none of his hardships. The hardest work she did was blowing Slick Willy. If you look close, you can see the sun setting through the back of her throat as proof.
Vance is a plus for this ticket. No one will come close to out thinking him on a debate stage. That goes for Headboard or whoever she chooses as her VP. They can't hold a candle to the guy and that is precisely why the msm is trying to destroy him as we speak. They are deathly afraid he will be a political success and then there will be 8 more years of Vance after Trump.
But it should be about policy. It isn't because our public school system doesn't teach history, economics, science and math. Because the MSM doesn't do any of these nor any dem candidates. Someone thinks that Vance is a worse candidate than Headboard, but for some reason doesn't set out any policy reasons why. An America First patriot versus an America Last commie.
Only one candidate has said they will ban fracking and as someone who works with Lufkin, Western, Dura, and other massive oil and gas field companies, including one in China, it’s an easy choice for me based on that alone. Throw in her support for the Green New Deal, which would destroy the US economy, and dozens of other silly ideas she has authored as a senator or supported with votes.
Why yes Trump doesn't want communism but your candidate and you propose only communism It's not like the communist ever actually killed anyone. Those are vicious rumors.
The Department of Homeland Security has refused to follow a law mandating it take DNA samples from illegal immigrants taken into custody, which would identify violent criminals and child traffickers, employees told the U.S. Senate this week.
Speaking to senators on Tuesday, three former WMD officials presented evidence that DHS and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) had blocked their efforts to comply with a 2005 law, then retaliated against them when they sounded the alarm about the lawbreaking.
"Given the enormous potential of DNA collection to facility solving crimes, we took our job seriously," Fred Wynn said.
Law enforcement experts from CBP's Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) unit were tasked with implementing a mandatory program to DNA-test illegals. But higher-ups at DHS were so opposed to the law that they continuously thwarted it, eventually disbanding the entire WMD division, the whistleblowers say. Disbanding the division may have opened the United States to a WMD attack, in addition to criminals crossing the border.
The disbanding also allowed hundreds of thousands of children to stay with people who claimed to be relatives, but who may have been child labor or sex traffickers. DNA testing is the only reliable way to ensure that children aren't coming across the border with traffickers, or being taken to live with them by U.S. officials as "sponsors."
...
Jones said the WMD team had its responsibilities stripped, and were told to come to work and simply sit and do nothing. In one case, one team member was told to report to a new desk that had no internet, phone, or power.
"Certain senior officials were hell-bent on slow-rolling any process or pilot program that enabled DNA collection," he said.
...
Mike Taylor, the third WMD whistleblower, said the men have repeatedly reached out to Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, but have received no corrective action. Meanwhile, those who retaliated against the men have been promoted.
Janet Napolitano, then the DHS, asked that the law be suspended for a while, then phased in gradually. Eric Holder allowed this.
And the "phase-in gradually" became what it was always intended to be -- a "never phase-in at all" order.
...
The report points to an illegal immigrant who committed multiple sexual assaults in Arizona in 1997. Though the individual had the DNA of the perpetrator, they could not find a match, since the suspect was not in the system. The crime was only solved in 2019 because the suspect went on to go to prison for another crime, at which point he had his DNA taken.
DHS then began punishing whistleblowers who called attention to this deliberate negligence to enforce a law. Read the article for that.
I'd probably vote for a shoehorn to keep a dem out of the White House but I could still tell you what priorities the shoehorn had that got my vote. Mindless criticism of Trump which leftards specialize in doesn't count.
they probably would’ve protested more if we were still a year out from the election. Right now having a plan is better than no plan at all, though with Kamala that’s still debatable. But they don’t have time to try and vet multiple people at this point.
Eh.... if it was anyone but headboard. Sure.... but she polled so bad last tike she dropped put before 2020.... she isn't who the democrat voter wants.....
Comments
I also will pick America.
Infrastructure Week and a healthcare plan are coming, just ask 2016-2020.
The other side says the same thing. Policy is a backseat right now to optics.
What is she standing in the way of with Trump?
Umm Vance is brilliant. I am not sure if I am reading your post correctly, if not my apologies, but the man is straight up smarter than anyone you or I probably know. Not only is he smart but he is self made with zero help from his skin color or sex. He is 39 and already very accomplished as a business owner and investor. He did all that after having been raised by a drugged out mother and a very rough grandmother.
He might not have been my first pick but that guy has come through a lot to get where he is. Private school Headboard, with two professor parents, has had none of his hardships. The hardest work she did was blowing Slick Willy. If you look close, you can see the sun setting through the back of her throat as proof.
Vance is a plus for this ticket. No one will come close to out thinking him on a debate stage. That goes for Headboard or whoever she chooses as her VP. They can't hold a candle to the guy and that is precisely why the msm is trying to destroy him as we speak. They are deathly afraid he will be a political success and then there will be 8 more years of Vance after Trump.
But it should be about policy. It isn't because our public school system doesn't teach history, economics, science and math. Because the MSM doesn't do any of these nor any dem candidates. Someone thinks that Vance is a worse candidate than Headboard, but for some reason doesn't set out any policy reasons why. An America First patriot versus an America Last commie.
Policy isn't a back seat. If Harris had Trump policies and vice versa I'd vote for Harris
It's not complicated. You're trying justify a vote that's all
Vote for Harris. Free country.
Only one candidate has said they will ban fracking and as someone who works with Lufkin, Western, Dura, and other massive oil and gas field companies, including one in China, it’s an easy choice for me based on that alone. Throw in her support for the Green New Deal, which would destroy the US economy, and dozens of other silly ideas she has authored as a senator or supported with votes.
I'd use the act like a man gif but that's asking too much of you
Why yes Trump doesn't want communism but your candidate and you propose only communism It's not like the communist ever actually killed anyone. Those are vicious rumors.
Fully vetted my ass. Dems view border security with the same enthusiasm that they support honest elections.
https://ace.mu.nu/
The DHS Refuses to Administer DNA Tests to Illegal Aliens, to Check to See If They're Wanted Criminals
—Disinformation Expert Ace
Of course.
Luke Rosiak:
Janet Napolitano, then the DHS, asked that the law be suspended for a while, then phased in gradually. Eric Holder allowed this.
And the "phase-in gradually" became what it was always intended to be -- a "never phase-in at all" order.
DHS then began punishing whistleblowers who called attention to this deliberate negligence to enforce a law. Read the article for that.
Hes just like the rest of the Rats. He’ll vote for a shoehorn if it keeps Trump out of the Whitehouse.
I'd probably vote for a shoehorn to keep a dem out of the White House but I could still tell you what priorities the shoehorn had that got my vote. Mindless criticism of Trump which leftards specialize in doesn't count.
Yup, my sister is all in on Kamela... ugh.
Hell have a debate and online poll and have the electors chosen that way.... at least it would be better than just annointing her....
that online poll would be hacked by Gushing Grannies, Fapple and Hitler Did Nothing Wrong before you could blink.
Still more democratic than this.
If I was a Democrat, I'd be protesting at the DNC....
they probably would’ve protested more if we were still a year out from the election. Right now having a plan is better than no plan at all, though with Kamala that’s still debatable. But they don’t have time to try and vet multiple people at this point.
Eh.... if it was anyone but headboard. Sure.... but she polled so bad last tike she dropped put before 2020.... she isn't who the democrat voter wants.....