But only congress can make laws and the left has been doing it for decades via government agencies. You cheer political operatives being able to write laws without congress. That's not how the constitution works. HTH
You have always been able to argue and prevail upon showing that an agency had exceeded its authority. Your expertise as a Mall Cop is not equal to that of someone who has worked in the area of law at issue though.
Svetlana, you do not need to further convince me that you’re for the Statist/Politburo approach to lawmaking. Unelected party apparatchiksare your preferred form of Daddy.
Yeah, sure that's what I said. There is a big difference from banning ICEs through regulation versus the SEC administering the Securities Acts. But it doesn't mean that the SEC can use administrative proceedings to impose fraud penalties when the defendant clearly has a right to a jury trial under the Constitution.
elect better and more productive congress people? One of the biggest problems in this country is that congress has abdicated their duty to actually pass full legislation.
Filling in the details should not be in the hands of the Supreme Court and it should not be in the hands of unelected regulatory agencies. Congress needs to do their jobs. Yes, legislation will take longer. Yes, it will be harder to pass things. Yes, we'll be better off for it.
You seem not to understand the implications. We're just going have unelected judges filling in the legislative gaps. Which makes sense, because lawyers are experts in everything. I know you agree.
Comments
But only congress can make laws and the left has been doing it for decades via government agencies. You cheer political operatives being able to write laws without congress. That's not how the constitution works. HTH
You have always been able to argue and prevail upon showing that an agency had exceeded its authority. Your expertise as a Mall Cop is not equal to that of someone who has worked in the area of law at issue though.
I was replying to HH.
Svetlana, you do not need to further convince me that you’re for the Statist/Politburo approach to lawmaking. Unelected party apparatchiks are your preferred form of Daddy.
New negotiating rule, for every new regulation added, one entire DEI department in Federal government gets cut.
Yeah, expertise like the CDC? EPA? FDA? DOJ? Using CAFE to ban internal combustion engines for EVs show what source of expertise?
"Throw that damn baby out with the bath water!", shrieked Gasbag.
Yeah, sure that's what I said. There is a big difference from banning ICEs through regulation versus the SEC administering the Securities Acts. But it doesn't mean that the SEC can use administrative proceedings to impose fraud penalties when the defendant clearly has a right to a jury trial under the Constitution.
Those complaining about appointed bureaucrats reconciling gaps in the legislation are now thrilled to have appointed judges doing it instead.
congrats
I thought that it was Congress that passed legislation. The executive branch does not have legislative powers. Other than that, you nailed it.
Nothing like the "expertise" of ladder climbing swamp creatures am I right?
My biggest worry about Trump is his own errors he has been good this round.... hopefully he keeps it up.
He's definitely learned a thing or two.
Muting the mics completely backfired on these idiots.
Read it more slowly, Gasbag. Seriously. You flunked out of law school, didn't you?
elect better and more productive congress people? One of the biggest problems in this country is that congress has abdicated their duty to actually pass full legislation.
Filling in the details should not be in the hands of the Supreme Court and it should not be in the hands of unelected regulatory agencies. Congress needs to do their jobs. Yes, legislation will take longer. Yes, it will be harder to pass things. Yes, we'll be better off for it.
there are no words
As usual for you
Just don't call the dazzler a fascist. Don't need Congress, just a dementia patient controlled by an unelected cabal.
You seem not to understand the implications. We're just going have unelected judges filling in the legislative gaps. Which makes sense, because lawyers are experts in everything. I know you agree.