See what happens with a nice diverse population? We can kick the world's ass in anything! Not just sports, anything. But "Ewwwhhhhrrrrrr, America first, ewwwhrrrrr"
Here is a thought. Smart talented English speaking immigrants will be successful and a contributor to American society. An illiterate Venezuelan gang member released from prison to come to the US to go on welfare and continue his life of crime here in the US will not. No Ukrainian NAZIs, no MS-13 members and no sharia supporting Muslims. But buck has no real thoughts and assumed he made some sort of killer point.
The illegal immigration is another topic, the topic I wanted to address is this board's general distaste for diversity and any attempts to encourage it. People from different backgrounds may have different viewpoints, perspective approaches etc that are healthy. Look…now we kick ass in cricket! We can do that across the board as soon as you old farts get out of the way and let us unleash that diverse talent!
We already know you have no vision. Just wait, an article will print the same thing I wrote on this thread a month from now. You'll still want to talk about the cloud war between AWS and Azure….ewwwwhhhhhrrrr
Define diversity? You project way too much. I worked with legal immigrants from all over the world and many gays and lesbians and I had no problems. They were all educated, spoke English, most had families to which they were very dedicated. But that's not how your side defines diversity. Your side starts with eliminating white people, especially conservative white males regardless of competency. When your "diversity" eliminates meritocracy then it's really just race and sex based discrimination. Of course you don't want to talk about illegal immigration nor do you want to talk about active race and sex based discrimination in our public schools, governments and large corporations.
No one wants to "eliminate" conservative white males. Leveling the playing field so that our jobs represent the US population accurately overcoming built in biases…yes.
Give me the odds of a white conservative male getting an Ivy League presidency? A UO or UW presidency? Entire categories of jobs are off limits to white male conservatives. The playing field was level. Like I said, hiring less competent individuals in the name of diversity is not leveling the playing field, it's just race and sex based discrimination in violation of the US Constitution and the US civil rights statutes. Hubert Humphrey promised that the Civil Rights Act would prohibit race based hiring and quotas. Of course, like Hubert and Buck, leftards lie and love to be lied to.
====
Senator Hubert Humphrey, who said that the bill ''would prohibit preferential treatment for any particular group'' and then promised that if the bill had any language ''which provides that the employer will have to hire on the basis of a percentage or quota related to quotas ... I will start eating the pages.''
oh for example, bringing in African American slaves in two hundred years ago, refusing them the right to read setting that culture back generations kicking off a cycle of poverty. That type of built in bias!!!
Dipshiticus doesn't realize demonrats were the ONLY white people that owned slaves! Blacks owned more than whites. Nor does he know the republican party was founded for the specific purpose of ending slavery. He probably likes Robert Byrd too just like Joe. He's voting for Joe…
Comments
Here is a thought. Smart talented English speaking immigrants will be successful and a contributor to American society. An illiterate Venezuelan gang member released from prison to come to the US to go on welfare and continue his life of crime here in the US will not. No Ukrainian NAZIs, no MS-13 members and no sharia supporting Muslims. But buck has no real thoughts and assumed he made some sort of killer point.
Pressing.
The illegal immigration is another topic, the topic I wanted to address is this board's general distaste for diversity and any attempts to encourage it. People from different backgrounds may have different viewpoints, perspective approaches etc that are healthy. Look…now we kick ass in cricket! We can do that across the board as soon as you old farts get out of the way and let us unleash that diverse talent!
We already know you have no vision. Just wait, an article will print the same thing I wrote on this thread a month from now. You'll still want to talk about the cloud war between AWS and Azure….ewwwwhhhhhrrrr
Pressing.
So you want to address something that doesn't exist rather than reality
Define diversity? You project way too much. I worked with legal immigrants from all over the world and many gays and lesbians and I had no problems. They were all educated, spoke English, most had families to which they were very dedicated. But that's not how your side defines diversity. Your side starts with eliminating white people, especially conservative white males regardless of competency. When your "diversity" eliminates meritocracy then it's really just race and sex based discrimination. Of course you don't want to talk about illegal immigration nor do you want to talk about active race and sex based discrimination in our public schools, governments and large corporations.
Put a chick in it and make her lame and gay
No one wants to "eliminate" conservative white males. Leveling the playing field so that our jobs represent the US population accurately overcoming built in biases…yes.
What built in biases?
Give me the odds of a white conservative male getting an Ivy League presidency? A UO or UW presidency? Entire categories of jobs are off limits to white male conservatives. The playing field was level. Like I said, hiring less competent individuals in the name of diversity is not leveling the playing field, it's just race and sex based discrimination in violation of the US Constitution and the US civil rights statutes. Hubert Humphrey promised that the Civil Rights Act would prohibit race based hiring and quotas. Of course, like Hubert and Buck, leftards lie and love to be lied to.
====
Senator Hubert Humphrey, who said that the bill ''would prohibit preferential treatment for any particular group'' and then promised that if the bill had any language ''which provides that the employer will have to hire on the basis of a percentage or quota related to quotas ... I will start eating the pages.''
oh for example, bringing in African American slaves in two hundred years ago, refusing them the right to read setting that culture back generations kicking off a cycle of poverty. That type of built in bias!!!
That’s not a bias. The beliefs of a Christian Conservative usually come into conflict of what’s taught at a university.
The Christian conservative would try to teach medical students that conception comes from the touch of the Holy Spirit instead of sex most likely.
Child level analysis
Let's talk 2024
Feel the love of diversity
You think Muslims represent?
Truth. I'll rack up another "W" and NoRebutalBannon surrenders again. :)
Add can't read to bucks list
Dipshiticus doesn't realize demonrats were the ONLY white people that owned slaves! Blacks owned more than whites. Nor does he know the republican party was founded for the specific purpose of ending slavery. He probably likes Robert Byrd too just like Joe. He's voting for Joe…
a little slow on the talking point. This one was making the rounds on X last night.
Was thinking exactly that. How a 7th grader would write an argument.