The US Government hates you
Comments
-
Michelle's top down bullshit is a complete joke. Ask any educator that has to stock for it.
Same as most liberal policies, sounds nice but full of perverse incentives and fuckups that don't work "in the weeds".
The dazzler upvote kiss of death should be the tell.
-
It would actually be one of the better investments we could make, and it also poses beneficial incentives. It's not as if it isn't done elsewhere either.
-
One problem is that if you are a healthy growing kid you need a lot more than Michelle's lunch. Another problem is that the school lunch isn't causing fat kids. It's what they eat the other 23 hours a day. The parents are fat and don't exercise and the odds are that their kids are fat. Another problem is that I'm not all that interested in buying another kid's lunch and I'm sure some retired couple who took care of their kids wouldn't have been all that interested in buying my kids' lunch. In case you haven't noticed is that involving big government isn't actually solving any problems it's just making them worse.
-
Much like all the "ending homelessness" investments the results on the ground have no correlation to the nice sounding "investments" proposed.
It just ends up being different unhealthy options that are harder to stock and are more expensive.
Feel free to show where the policy made a statistically relevant impact on childhood obesity or health though.
-
This is true, however Americans have the choice to say no to buying foods with such chemicals which would force the companies to alter their recipe.
-
Dazzler gonna dazzle
-
sure, but when it’s like 70+ percent it’s systemic. Like even if true its irrelevant once the percentages are this high
-
Fatties gonna fat
-
That’s a start. Good luck the rest of the way.
.
-
I really should become a dictator.
My policy is simple: no fat chicks
