Well, what about those Chinese trademarks that Ivana Trump had which were never really used. And Trump was working on a deal to build a tower in Moscow that never got built.
That folks is a break away light post cutting through the wing. It's made to snap the bolts at the bottom of the column and fall. A far cry from the massive solid steel beams in the World Trade Center.
ke=1/2mv2. Big difference in kinetic energy going over 500mph (square being exponential not linear) and taxing at 10 mph(?). Plus tons of fuel burning up in a vertical furnace.
I just pointed out the basic fallacy of the point. Planes did hit the World Trade Center at over 500 mph. I could throw a bullet at someone at 30mph and nothing happens. Muzzle velocity of a 9mm standard bullet at 1,150 fps is a different story.
I don't think were not doing 500MPH at sea level but I understand kinetic energy and I am saying those outer beams would have shredded that thing. And the inner core was yet to come and it's much stronger. I don't think it could have caused the progressive collapse. That's never happened before without explosive cutting charges. But if you look at the debris you'll find lots of beams with explosive cutting charge shapes on the ends.
Possibly, but the phony example provided was an embarrassment if you are trying to make your point. Posting a picture of a beam with explosive cutting charge shapes on the end would be more persuasive and explaining how many there were and how they got there
Comments
When they show you their bravery-
I'm totally avoiding Facebook right now. The 🌈 stuff has been totally out of control the last few years.
Well, what about those Chinese trademarks that Ivana Trump had which were never really used. And Trump was working on a deal to build a tower in Moscow that never got built.
That folks is a break away light post cutting through the wing. It's made to snap the bolts at the bottom of the column and fall. A far cry from the massive solid steel beams in the World Trade Center.
ke=1/2mv2. Big difference in kinetic energy going over 500mph (square being exponential not linear) and taxing at 10 mph(?). Plus tons of fuel burning up in a vertical furnace.
Now do Building 7.
I just pointed out the basic fallacy of the point. Planes did hit the World Trade Center at over 500 mph. I could throw a bullet at someone at 30mph and nothing happens. Muzzle velocity of a 9mm standard bullet at 1,150 fps is a different story.
Good thing Building 7 was built to withstand muzzles and airplane wings.
I don't think were not doing 500MPH at sea level but I understand kinetic energy and I am saying those outer beams would have shredded that thing. And the inner core was yet to come and it's much stronger. I don't think it could have caused the progressive collapse. That's never happened before without explosive cutting charges. But if you look at the debris you'll find lots of beams with explosive cutting charge shapes on the ends.
Possibly, but the phony example provided was an embarrassment if you are trying to make your point. Posting a picture of a beam with explosive cutting charge shapes on the end would be more persuasive and explaining how many there were and how they got there