Trump will probably be convicted Tomorrow...
Comments
-
As another reminder of just how little integrity Leftist Tugtards possess, they support this completely unhinged ruling by Merchan.
-
Maybe nothing. Maybe something. We'll see what the jury decides. But if the jury finds him guilty, don't you all go rioting like animals again. I know EverettChris is already planning storming Everett city hall so I've already informed the police.
-
Gibberish
-
Again?
When did we riot previously? -
@Throbber Jan 6 (broken record)
-
-
The Moses Malone verdict
-
The only thing that matters to them is an initial GUILTY verdict no matter how much they manipulate and bastardize the legal process to get there.
It’s a tipping point either way.
-
Lots of excuses guys….before you see the outcome of the trial lots of excuses.
-
Name 2
-
You can feel the deep concern for an honest justice system from our Tug leftards and the MSM.
-
Even if Trump was obviously guilty of something, you guys would find some lame excuse why he's not. Let's clarify that point right now.
Want proof of this statement? Look no further than the dumb "election was stolen" accusations.
-
So what is he obviously guilty of that we are making a lame excuse for?
You seem to be struggling today
Why change the subject?
-
Oh that was in response to the "The Left Hates an Honest Justice system" comment. I stated that even if Trump was blatantly guilty of something, you'd believe any excuse he fed you. Just my observation.
I haven't claimed he's guilty of anything….yet.
-
You said he was an insurrectionist.
-
All a sham. This trial, venue, judge, jury instructions, charges… it's all unconstitutional. You cheer. What a cuck.
-
Go ahead and post my post where I said that Bob.
-
Translating Flip Or Flops Post: I don't like it when my hero may potentially break the rules so im going to cry about the refs.
-
-
The girls want to let the defendant walk if the jury unanimously concludes he falsified records to conceal another crime.
Why don't you gals just join the ACLU and drop this pretense of being conservatives?
-
I believe I was calling the rioters themselves insurrectionists. Cmon Bob.
-
Lol. Another crime that we need to guess on and he's never been charged with. Imagine defending this.
-
My mistake. You were calling the J6's who have never been charged with insurrection insurrectionists.
-
”We” were nowhere near a riot in DC. (Assuming you are referencing DC). “We” were in Eastern Washington
For someone who repeatedly references precise language in other’s posts you certainly take liberty to not maintain the same standard for yourself. -
So I haven't accused Trump of anything?
-
Did Kreskin tell you that?
-
Yes, you have a clean record of not accusing Trump of being a criminal.
-
Look what misogynistic turd floated to the surface to stink up the place.
Amazing insight as always, Retard.
Multiple choice “unanimous” verdicts is how low you fascists have gone to get Trump.
-
Thank you, im glad we set the record set. I'll start calling him a criminal the moment he gets convicted.
-
Just imagine that somehow in deep blue NYC that the jury is made up with 12 Buck, Fern, and mello clones and the judge is the dazzler. Now buck has told us that Trump is guilty of something, he is just unable to tell us what and that the evidence from a Trump hating Cohen, noted perjurer, is not subject to any reasonable doubt. So, obviously a conviction converts lies to truth by transubstantiation.
