Trump will probably be convicted Tomorrow...
Comments
-
-
Why don't you somewhat reasonable people ask Sled and co. to shut it down every now and again? This shit is hilarious, but it would be better for everyone if we were grounded. Just think about why you passively encourage this. That's all I'm askin'.
-
You're an insufferable dipship.
-
Not that it is any surprise to logical people, but it’s confirmed with this campaign event that prosecuting Trump is a campaign tactic and the worst abuse of the criminal justice system in the history of USA politics. Even better is they have a Capitol police officer who lied to the J6 committee about his whereabouts and actions on that day, but none of that matters when you’re a part of a totalitarian regime.
Nice job on the date, Retards. Can’t even get that correct.
-
Either way it strengthens Trump. These made up demonrat scams are backfiring Yugely!
-
Babylon Bee pretty much has it nailed. Crooked Judge rules that each juror can just pick which specific crime Trump committed. No need for a unanimous jury to convict of a specific crime, just that he was guilty of something. Good thing that the dems have such a great respect for the Constitution.
Judge Merchan Violates the Constitution Again, Instructs Jury That They Don't Need to be Unanimous About Which Mystery Crime Constitutes the Legal Predicate for the Trump Prosecution
—Disinformation Expert Ace
Hey, hit Trump with a gag order about mentioning this in his appeal. His appeal might endanger Merchan and his Democrat whore daughter.
The prosecution wants a Choose Your Own Adventure style verdict -- jurors can pick from three offered predicate crimes. And they don't even have to agree on which of the three possibilities they're convicting Trump under; five jurors can pick Possible Predicate #1, four can pick Possible Predicate #2, two can pick Possible Predicate #3, and one can even make up his own predicate. As long as they all say that some predicate is present, they can convict.
This is against the law. The Supreme Court has ruled that juries must be unanimous about all elements of a crime to convict.
Judge Juan Merchan ruled that the jury does not need to unanimously agree on the specific 'predicate' crime Donald Trump committed to convict him of felony-level falsification of business records. Legal experts, including Greta Van Susteren, have pointed to a Supreme Court case that contradicts this ruling.
Key Details:
Judge's Ruling: Judge Juan Merchan ruled that for a felony conviction, the jury need not unanimously agree on which specific crime Trump intended to cover up by falsifying business records.
Legal Precedent: Legal analyst Greta Van Susteren highlighted a Supreme Court case, Richardson v. United States, which emphasizes the need for jury unanimity on underlying offenses.
Defense Argument: Trump's defense argued for unanimity on the 'predicate' crime, but the prosecution maintained that the law does not require such agreement.
Diving Deeper:
In a significant ruling, Judge Juan Merchan determined that the jury in Donald Trump's hush money trial does not need to unanimously agree on the specific 'predicate' crime Trump allegedly committed to secure a conviction for felony-level falsification of business records. This decision plays a crucial role in the prosecution's strategy to elevate the charges against Trump.
According to the ruling, while the jury must unanimously agree that Trump falsified business documents to commit or conceal another crime, they do not need to concur on what that specific crime was. This ruling sparked controversy and drew criticism from legal experts, including Greta Van Susteren, who cited the Supreme Court case Richardson v. United States. In that 1999 case, the Court ruled that jurors must unanimously agree on the specific underlying offenses in a Continuing Criminal Enterprise (CCE) prosecution.
The prosecution initially presented four possible predicate crimes, o
-
De Niro illustrates the democrats strategy
-
-
Banana Republic
-
A large part of a Marxist/Totalitarianism takeover is to destroy the citizens’ faith in systems and norms.
I hope they convict Trump and demand him to custody immediately. Let’s get this started.
