The national figure is that 25% of SF home costs are due to regulation. I would assume in CA it's probably pushing closer to 40% at this point. That's gotta be a few hundred grand, at least, for a median home in the state. I will grant you that their costs will always be higher than Kansas because of demand, though. Probably will do a lot more traveling to CA once the kids are at an age where we can tolerate the flight with them since it's the shortest trip to a sunny state.*
*Although we should be door. ass. out. to a sunnier state by then.
I'd have to read into the subject more. I think the reg driven % of cost is also gonna vary dramatically (even in CA) based on Zip Code in price point. I mean I doubt 40% of a $12,000,000 SF in Newport Beach is due to restrictive zoning laws or regs that affect building cost per sq ft (some of it is, but not 40%). With the primo dirt it's a supply and demand thing. There's a reason why DFW and Houston are so much cheaper than coastal CA and it ain't all related to communism.
I've crawled up and down every nook and cranny from Rockies west and I refuse to pick a favorite. It's not possible. I'm just pissed Nevada didn't even make the poll, the state with the most mountains and valleys in the country sans Alaska. Playas, deserts, mountains, sunshine, canyons, snow, palm trees, cactus, moose, rattlesnakes,.and Lake Tahoe. Barren wasteland my ass. You fucked this one up @YellowSnow
Anything other than California is a joke. There's a lot of cultural stuff to shit on there but the fact everything in California is in one state is straight up lunacy. One of the coolest things to me is that you have maybe the world's most famous city which is just fucking gigantic - LA County has millions more people than all of Washington and a massive portion of California is some of the most rural places in the world it feels like.
Listen here @CallMeBigErn you bonio - Vanilla only give us 10 spots, so 2 states are getting left out.
Nevada is the most obvious one to not make the cut. Yes, there are few stunning mountainous areas- i.e., Tahoe, Great Basin National Park, etc. The Ruby Mts are some of the best heli skiiing on Earth. But most of it is barren wasteland good for mining and blowing up nukes. GTFO outta here with the playas! That's for Burning Man Freaks like @UW_Doog_Bot .
New Mexico is a little trickier. It's got some beautiful mountains, but is it really beating out CO, WY, MT, etc in this regard? No. As far a Southwest scenery goes, it's not beating out AZ or UT.
I'm probably just a homer. The Rockies and associated ranges make for some high elevation scenery that Washington can't quite match, even in the northern Cascades. They don't have an ocean there though and everything turns to shit fast on the east side of the Rockies
Comments
Yes, I seem to recall this thing in common.
The national figure is that 25% of SF home costs are due to regulation. I would assume in CA it's probably pushing closer to 40% at this point. That's gotta be a few hundred grand, at least, for a median home in the state. I will grant you that their costs will always be higher than Kansas because of demand, though. Probably will do a lot more traveling to CA once the kids are at an age where we can tolerate the flight with them since it's the shortest trip to a sunny state.*
*Although we should be door. ass. out. to a sunnier state by then.
I'd have to read into the subject more. I think the reg driven % of cost is also gonna vary dramatically (even in CA) based on Zip Code in price point. I mean I doubt 40% of a $12,000,000 SF in Newport Beach is due to restrictive zoning laws or regs that affect building cost per sq ft (some of it is, but not 40%). With the primo dirt it's a supply and demand thing. There's a reason why DFW and Houston are so much cheaper than coastal CA and it ain't all related to communism.
Where it hurts is in places like Temecula
The trade was a big house priced reasonable and good schools for the longer commute
House prices are out of control there because it's safer and cleaner. New homes still have the added costs and tiny lots.
It's hard
All those other states will be dust bowls but Washington will still be great because Insley and Ferguson saved it by banning gas vehicles.
I've crawled up and down every nook and cranny from Rockies west and I refuse to pick a favorite. It's not possible. I'm just pissed Nevada didn't even make the poll, the state with the most mountains and valleys in the country sans Alaska. Playas, deserts, mountains, sunshine, canyons, snow, palm trees, cactus, moose, rattlesnakes,.and Lake Tahoe. Barren wasteland my ass. You fucked this one up @YellowSnow
Also, New Mexico? Bueller?
Shut this dumbshit poll down until it includes all Western states.
If I had a gun to my head I'm gonna go with Utah. I have a strong Edward Abbey streak.
But also maybe California. California has everything.
Gonna fall asleep to my boy. 🙏 Go team American Southwest. Hayduke lives!
Anything other than California is a joke. There's a lot of cultural stuff to shit on there but the fact everything in California is in one state is straight up lunacy. One of the coolest things to me is that you have maybe the world's most famous city which is just fucking gigantic - LA County has millions more people than all of Washington and a massive portion of California is some of the most rural places in the world it feels like.
Listen here @CallMeBigErn you bonio - Vanilla only give us 10 spots, so 2 states are getting left out.
Nevada is the most obvious one to not make the cut. Yes, there are few stunning mountainous areas- i.e., Tahoe, Great Basin National Park, etc. The Ruby Mts are some of the best heli skiiing on Earth. But most of it is barren wasteland good for mining and blowing up nukes. GTFO outta here with the playas! That's for Burning Man Freaks like @UW_Doog_Bot .
New Mexico is a little trickier. It's got some beautiful mountains, but is it really beating out CO, WY, MT, etc in this regard? No. As far a Southwest scenery goes, it's not beating out AZ or UT.
I think I got this pole 100% right, pod.
The homerism for Washington in these types of polls always cracks my up.
I mean WA is one of the most scenic states in the country no doubt but it ain't no CA.
Tahoe » Chelan
Redwoods » Hoh Rain Forest
Big Sur » @creepycoug and the Harb
Yosemite » N. Cascades or Olympics
I’m gonna guess Yella is the leader on how many of these states have lived in with 4.
I can claim 3: WA, CO, AZ
The true measure is how many states has one had sex in.
Need to get me some WYO and NM strange.
I can claim sex in the following states:
WA, OR, CA, ID, MT, WY, UT, NV, and AZ.
I've never been to NM with a woman and I got cock-blocked by some lesbos in CO once.
Vanilla saved your ass but my protest remains active.
I also have a Mea Culpa @CallMeBigErn appears I Bryan Kelly'd the pole with CO twice.
Oh, well, wasn't gonna change the outcome. "Perfection, is the enemy of good" is my motto.
I'm probably just a homer. The Rockies and associated ranges make for some high elevation scenery that Washington can't quite match, even in the northern Cascades. They don't have an ocean there though and everything turns to shit fast on the east side of the Rockies
When I think of a place where all the beauty comes together I always think of Bakersfield. Stockton a close second.