Can a Leftist Tugtard explain what Trump did that merits a $454 million seizure of assets?
Please tell me @MelloDawg, @HHusky, and @HuskyBuck.
Also, why aren’t the lenders who valued Trump’s assets to be much higher than Judge Saggy Balls Mirror Flex and Letitia James not being prosecuted for financial fraud since they loaned money on their on valuations of Trump’s assets.
Comments
-
Literally Hitler.
.
-
No difference between this and what Castro did in Cuba.
This is a historic moment in history.
Go fuck your self, Fascists. Democrats finally are going there.
-
Meanwhile no bail for murderers in New York
-
Mar A Lago now worth hundreds of millions again. JFC
-
Bitching about the consequences flowing from breaking a law passed by Republicans in the 1950s which required honesty in business dealings and disgorgement of benefits obtained through dishonesty is sooooo conservative, of course.
-
The answer to the question is no they can't
-
Yeah the irony is this whole show trial has actually made it worth a lot more than it would have been before.
-
In other words, JP Morgan was just like a defenseless 81 year old with Alzheimer's having his pension stolen by son on a fraudulent real estate deal. The only stealing going on is by the state of New York. This will be a great shot in the arm for their collapsing commercial real estate market.
-
Who'd want to do business in New York if you have to behave honestly?
-
Letitia is going to clean up Wall Street next!
-
Ever heard of the SEC? Not that SEC. The other one.
-
"Who'd want to do business in New York if
you have to behave honestlythere was no due process and no equal application of the law?"I remember from law school that damage awards and fines had to have some reasonable relation to the damage caused. We have asked you several times to list the damages and for some reason you have declined to tell us how JP Morgan and other NY lenders were damaged.
-
Why am I included as a leftist here?
-
You should have gone to a better law school. And finished all three years.
-
@HHusky can’t explain what Trump did wrong. Judge Mirror Flex just had his valuation destroyed by reality. H is very, very stupid.
Will the other two stooges take a stab?
-
It's wrong because Trump hurt H's pussy
-
What part of obtaining more favorable financing rates through fraud was too difficult to understand?
-
Where's the fraud if the banks that signed off on the loans, did their own valuation and negotiated the amount of loan based on that and were paid back?
Where's the fraud?
-
Speaking of fraud
-
The banks signed off on all loans based on their own valuation, you imbecile. They gave testimony. Judge Mirror Flex disregarded it.
Where does the $454 million punishment come from regardless of whatever victimless “fraud” you fascists have dreamed up, you fucking fascist piece of shit?
-
Open hypocrisy and fascism. I get H when things finally come to a head. Guaranteed he’s depending on others in a pinch.
-
He can’t answer that question because he’s a liar who lacks above anverage intelligence. Always has been, always will be. Seems like the type who is waiting for a parent he can’t stand to die and leave their hard-earned assets to their loser son.
-
Pitchfork is right again. Letticia is just the latest hero of the left to be a criminal fraud loved because she hates Trump
Maybe she can get a cell next to Michael Avennati
-
Exactly, there is a reason the banks do their own appraisals.
-
Hey retard, after you show off your brains again answering my question, head on back to the football board so you can embarrass yourself on it some more.
-
To answer the original question.
Mean tweets - is your answer.
Disregard:
Great economy
Low unemployment
Low interest rates
Low rate of inflation
Peace breaking out in the Middle East
ISIS on the run
Russia staying in their own country
Historical funding of HBCU
Repeal of the crime bill Joe Biden put in place
Energy independence
Stay in Mexico
But really- It's about mean tweets.
-
"Reliance
Defendants have argued vociferously throughout the trial that there can be no fraud as, they
assert, that none of the banks or insurance companies relied on any of the alleged
misrepresentations . The proponents of this theory posit that lenders demand complex statements
of financial condition but then ignore them.
Defendants' argument is to no avail, as none of plaintiff's causes of action requires that it
demonstrate reliance. Instead, plaintiff must merely show that defendants intended to commit
the fraud. Reliance is not a requisite element of either Executive Law § 63(12) or of any of the
alleged Penal Law violations. See, e.g., People v Essner, 124 Misc 2d 830, 834 (Sup Ct, NY
County 1984) ( Reliance then is not an element of [Penal Law § 175.45 - Falsifying Business
Records] , and documents subpoenaed to prove or disprove reliance by the banks are
immaterial ).
However, the Court notes that, although not required, there is ample documentary and
testimonial evidence that the banks, insurance companies, and the City of New York did, in fact,
rely on defendants to be truthful and accurate in their financial submissions. The testimony in
this case makes abundantly clear that most, if not all, loans began life based on numbers on an
SFC, which the lenders interpreted in their own unique way. The testimony confirmed, rather
than refuted, the overriding importance of SFCs in lending decisions.*
*To take one of innumerable examples, Robert Unell testified that Deutsche Bank and Ladder Capital
would have analyzed Donald Trump's net worth based on the contents ofthe SFCs. Indeed, witness after
witness testified that the SFCs were important to them, and/ or were the starting point of their analysis."(emphasis added for the rubes)
-
Look the dumbass is quoting something
-
Based on your post-voting history, how would any reasonable person conclude otherwise?
. -
How is there fraud involved when the banks do their own, arms-length evaluation of the property?
A commercial appraisal is a rigorous endeavor.
The bank has no other compulsory duty than their own due diligence. Then they make their own decisions for themselves.
But fraud. Or some happy horseshit HH saw on msnbc.
.
