No idea exactly what he is worth, but go ahead and have the government fine a bank 10-20% of their value, payable within 30 days and just see what happens.
The dazzler is such a capitalists. So JP Morgan is so unsophisticated that with all their real attorneys, MBAs and real estate investment bankers that Trump stole their loan money away from some undetermined borrower who didn't get a loan. Trump got loans at the market price. The market determined the loan amount to Trump and the terms as did the market for every other borrower. There was no damage to the public. If you look at the dazzler's cited cases, they all have specific damaged parties.
Yes, The cash amount a defendant USUALLY has to put up is 10% of the bond when the bondsman or guarantor (bank) cosigner guarantees the full amount to the court.
That's what a Bondsman Guarantor does when you don't have the full amount in cash.
The defendant or cosigner or bank has assets or cash that would be put up as collateral that would be forfeited (in this case no bank wanted any part of 460mil ) in the event the defendant loses on appeal and could not meet the judgement amount.
You can spout off whatever you want but that has been MY experience/ understanding and that's all I represented in my comment.
Again, this is some serious corrupt kangaroo court bullshit and I don't know what is normal in a multimultimillion dollar shakedown witchhunt case in New York but it's already gotten knocked down by appeal because it was obviously beyond unfair.
That is the ultimate point and you're clearly butthurt.
Without knowing New York State law, which you don’t either, Retard, typically bond can be bailed at 10% but you’re so far in on Fascism now that you’re just grasping at anything and you’re getting the Tug beatdown of the year so far.
This I typically when you disappear for a week to a month and then come back thinking nobody remembers just how unbelievably stupid you are when you try and engage in an actual discussion.
Comments
"Daddy's too big to fail!", screeched Bob_C.
No idea exactly what he is worth, but go ahead and have the government fine a bank 10-20% of their value, payable within 30 days and just see what happens.
And the daddy tell
The dazzler is such a capitalists. So JP Morgan is so unsophisticated that with all their real attorneys, MBAs and real estate investment bankers that Trump stole their loan money away from some undetermined borrower who didn't get a loan. Trump got loans at the market price. The market determined the loan amount to Trump and the terms as did the market for every other borrower. There was no damage to the public. If you look at the dazzler's cited cases, they all have specific damaged parties.
States rights
anarchistlibertarian says NY can't choose to punish business fraud when the victims are unidentified.We don't know, of course, who precisely lost opportunities Daddy obtained through his frauds.
Yeah, Libertarians are really asking for more government intervention in financial transactions between two willing parties. Jesus Christ.
On the 60th Anniversary of the Beatles coming to America, Race channels his inner 13-year-old girl.
Daddy's rich!!!
Meltdown
So no evidence. That's what I thought
Semantics...
Excuse me for leaving out "of the" bond.
Yes, The cash amount a defendant USUALLY has to put up is 10% of the bond when the bondsman or guarantor (bank) cosigner guarantees the full amount to the court.
That's what a Bondsman Guarantor does when you don't have the full amount in cash.
The defendant or cosigner or bank has assets or cash that would be put up as collateral that would be forfeited (in this case no bank wanted any part of 460mil ) in the event the defendant loses on appeal and could not meet the judgement amount.
You can spout off whatever you want but that has been MY experience/ understanding and that's all I represented in my comment.
Again, this is some serious corrupt kangaroo court bullshit and I don't know what is normal in a multimultimillion dollar shakedown witchhunt case in New York but it's already gotten knocked down by appeal because it was obviously beyond unfair.
That is the ultimate point and you're clearly butthurt.
The amount was calculated in the opinion. It didn't require more than grade school arithmetic (addition mostly) and referenced the record.
You gals should read it.
Grade school calculations
No evidence
Please continue
You're still defending it. lol…
Just stick to your misogynistic insults, you complete retard.
Hilariously inept. Good thing Daddy has his retirement for you.
Called it earlier. It’s a slam dunk bet once he gets the hamster treading his brain wheel and it runs out of energy.
Without knowing New York State law, which you don’t either, Retard, typically bond can be bailed at 10% but you’re so far in on Fascism now that you’re just grasping at anything and you’re getting the Tug beatdown of the year so far.
This I typically when you disappear for a week to a month and then come back thinking nobody remembers just how unbelievably stupid you are when you try and engage in an actual discussion.
Madam, we're not talking about the price at which the bond can be obtained because Daddy wasn't regarded as a good enough risk by any bonding company.
I haven’t read most of this thread, but I assume most everyone, save one or two, is upset about a 2-tiered justice system.
As an undecided voter, this news doesn’t sway me much.
Because you're a fascist