Here's One Top 25 Poll That Won't Dismiss the Start-Over Huskies
Comments
-
Appreciate the love. Not a huge fan of mentioning that Oregon should be ranked #4 because Lanning "turned down the Alabama job." Then highlighting Dante Moore as one of the reasons they should be ranked that high when he's not gonna be the starter and was downright scary last year, and not in a good way.
Completely writing UW off as a team that can't get into somewhere say #11-25 is silly. There are plenty of Iowas and Kansas States and ACC teams every year which end up in there with not much to work with.
-
-
If TCU was returning from the natty game with 20 starters gone and no feasible offensive linemen in March, it wouldn't be silly to not include them in your top 25.
-
Yeah but what if their coach also left?
-
Since Nacho seems to be absent, I'll take care of the DRFS trigger warning for @Mad_Son .
-
TCU is also a sisters of the poor program compared to UW. We? should be able to reload much quicker than that school.
-
Call me a doog I just don't think the TCU and UW comparisons are fair.
-
nothing doog about it. UW and TCU are not in the same realm. At all.
-
Nacho Is on sabbatical since all SI articles are Raley articles.
-
UW won their fucking conference for starters.
TCU got voted into the CFP for lame reasons. And then Michigan played their worst game in years for them.
-
Thanks Taft!
-
@Mad_Son remembers
