Fan Podcast: Analysis of Scott Woodward
Comments
-
Sark should have been fired after the Alamo Bowl.
-
RoadDawg55 said:
I'm outraged that my comment about having a booster who isn't enjoying a
cheeseburgersalmon and merlot in the club suites with a wife with a mink coat and Luobiton's was cut out. -
Once you've got all of your own podcasts in, then you'll have 5 more years before you get syndicated and can then be called a success, even if the results are mediocre.
-
Overall, that was a good effort.
Some observations:
How did you guys not make the obvious connection between the homerism of the broadcast team and UW's efforts under Woodward to push propoganda for the program (hi Gregg Bell!)? You briefly touched on Woodward's connection to it, but didn't notice that Woodward has been the catalyst for these changes.
Sark will get extended if he goes 8-5. You guys are right that he should get the door.ass.out. for 8-5, but it won't happen under Woodward. If Woodward was a REAL AD, he would have fired Sark after the 2012 Apple Cup as you guys mentioned.
Promoting Wilcox to replace Sark is a horrible move, even though he is more qualified than Sark. If you're going to fire Sark, go get the BEST coach available for the job.
Wilcox needs to go be a head coach in the Mountain West.
You guys should do a whole episode ripping the big time boosters like Fleenor who have been so tolerant of this decade of shit tier football. Those boosters should be looking to get rid of Woodward. Also, the big swinging dick boosters rant needed a meatspin reference. -
Did I get a shout out?
-
We will need to find a podcast equivalent name for our very own FB's 7 win Steve.
How about the PodFather? -
Great point on the homerism.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Overall, that was a good effort.
Some observations:
How did you guys not make the obvious connection between the homerism of the broadcast team and UW's efforts under Woodward to push propoganda for the program (hi Gregg Bell!)? You briefly touched on Woodward's connection to it, but didn't notice that Woodward has been the catalyst for these changes.
Sark will get extended if he goes 8-5. You guys are right that he should get the door.ass.out. for 8-5, but it won't happen under Woodward. If Woodward was a REAL AD, he would have fired Sark after the 2012 Apple Cup as you guys mentioned.
Promoting Wilcox to replace Sark is a horrible move, even though he is more qualified than Sark. If you're going to fire Sark, go get the BEST coach available for the job.
Wilcox needs to go be a head coach in the Mountain West.
You guys should do a whole episode ripping the big time boosters like Fleenor who have been so tolerant of this decade of shit tier football. Those boosters should be looking to get rid of Woodward. Also, the big swinging dick boosters rant needed a meatspin reference.
I think we should definitely do a booster podcast and had that thought at the end of the podcast when we were already out of time and my recording cutoff.
The point about Wilcox is important for anyone on the fence about Sark. They should understand he's not even the best coach or most qualified on his own staff, therefore his mediocrity shouldn't be tolerated.
-
Da fuck? I thought Sark was pool boy....He_Needs_More_Time said:Also just a critique in future podcast refer to Scott Woodward as Pool Boy. It felt weird hearing his actual name on a Husky fan podcast.
-
-
Tl,dl
