Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Fact check
RaceBannon
Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,018 
in Tug Tavern
Comments
I find the people who pull out Snopes, factcheck.org, and Wikipedia to make claims are people I’d never want to be around in real life. It’s like an alarm ringing “I’m a gullible Leftist dipshit” loudly to hear.
BTW, what does “Winds of Change” have to say about Biden wearing his hard hat like a halfwit while smiling like a dolt?
You’re right. Taking something at face value from typically partisan sources is always more reliable.
I suppose this means that this dopey dullard finds Snopes an objective source.
Actually, if it is a honest conservative site, it is very reliable. Like there was no Trump-Russian collusion, that the chicom crud came from a chicom biolab in Wuhan China, that the crud was like a bad flu unless you were really old or had several comorbidities, that the vaxx was not one of the most effective vaccines ever, that the "Make Inflation Greater Act" actually did make inflation greater rather than reducing inflation, that Milton Friedman remains in charge, that wind, solar and EVs are not cheap renewable and reliable, that the borders are open. On the other hand, I'm not aware of any leftard MSM or website that is reliable in the slightest way. Given your side's horrible track record on the main events of the last several years you would think that an educated honest introspection would be due. That is unless you are a partisan hack of a government employee. Leftards lie and love to be lied to.
I’ve got bad news.
Add in that Facebook and Twitter were asked by the government to censor “misinformation” on things like Covid vaccine efficacy and Hunter Biden’s laptop. Things that turned out to be true in relation to what “experts” were saying at the time.
Uncurious people like this @mellodawg are mostly hopeless dunces who are most likely government employees or trust funders in my experience.
So please tell how the hard hat isn't backwards
I don’t recall ever saying what my side is.
MelloTard’s favorite fact checker lied so bad on this one it had to almost immediately be corrected.
https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2024/01/27/power-of-the-backlash-snopes-forced-to-change-their-fact-check-of-biden-wearing-hard-hat-backwards-n2169311
Fact check sites are more than typically partisan.
Snopes is a VERY partisan source, and the fact that they advertise themselves as a non-partisan checker of facts is "extremely dangerous" to borrow a quote from what the media has been programmed to say about Trump.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/snopes-admits-biden-wore-construction-hard-hat-backwards-fact-check-reversal Fuck Snopes and morons like Mello and his band of fellow fags.
Why can't Snopes be more like gatewaypundit and never admit an error?
As far as I can tell, Gateway Pundit doesn’t claim to be an objective source for factchecking, unlike Snopes. Mouthbreather mellodawg actually believes Snopes is objective, which is just sad for an adult to believe.
It’s no surprise this major difference in mission statements escaped your attention, Retard.
I don't read Gateway Pundit, but I guarantee you on the big events in the last few years they have a much better record than the Washington Post. Tug leftards are a big O'fer on the big issues but claim to have the moral superiority. I would let mello walk my dog for free, let alone pay him for a job he is totally unprepared for.
That’s weird, I don’t recall ever saying I use Snopes or support its fact checking
Now that's a lie
Check the facts.