The gals want you to read what they have to say--and no one stops them from saying it, despite Race's claims of "censorship"--but they totally object to you taking any action based on what they have to say.
The gals want you to read what they have to say--and no one stops them from saying it, despite Race's claims of "censorship"--but they totally object to you taking any action based on what they have to say.
The Bill of Rights are no longer anything that will stop the Government from infringing upon them.
It’s probably the top feature that will define the legacy of 46.
Which part of the Bill of Rights says speech has no consequences?
It's not some SJW bureaucrat's job to regulate if Mike the fireman says he likes Trump on Facebook. You know this. You're just arguing out of boredom, like you do every day.
Whether it's a good use of time and funds is a different issue. You said it was unconstitutional. Thanks for conceding your error.
It's overreach. 1984. What is the line? Remember when people got fired for criticizing BLM in 2020?
They claim the line is purporting to represent the town. Perfectly legitimate to argue they are going beyond that and/or to argue it’s not a good use of resources.
They don't want people who support Trump or rightfully claim that chicks can't have dicks representing Gilbert.
Vote 'em out.
But don't whine that "Big Brother" reads statements you choose to publish.
Of course you can't imagine better uses of tax dollars than spying on employees.
Tell me you're a fascist without telling me you're a fascist. Shithead.
Comments
Fascist
Fuck off
You're no Constitutional Scholar. Not even close.
This isn't why anyone Wintered at Valley Forge.
You're pussies.
Gawd you’re stupid, Shit.
Which job pays you more? Being a Shitty Attorney, or ineffectually trolling for Dems?
wait until you find out about your phone and your car