Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

50% of college football viewership comes from just 18 teams

Purple_Pills
Purple_Pills Member Posts: 2,110
in Hardcore Husky Board








· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • Joey
    Joey Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,517 Founders Club
    All roads lead to Oregon though I’m hearing.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Canadawg
    Canadawg Member Posts: 5,905
    Sport needs all the teams to be what it is. G league doesn't get millions of viewers but Montana kicking UWs ass does
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kingdome_Urinals
    Kingdome_Urinals Member Posts: 2,896
    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    The viewership conversation always crack me up because they're circular arguments. The teams that networks put in the most watched time slots on the most watched channels are unsurprisingly going to draw the most viewers.

    I'm not saying poverty programs like WSU could draw the same numbers if they were given the same prime-time slots, so don't twist.

    Well, playing in the peach, rose, fiesta, sugar bowl and championship game certainly boosted UW’s numbers over that time span.

    I don’t think uw got a ton of highly watched pac 12 after dark games during that span.

    In other words UW was earning those numbers via on field success.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,773
    I’m buying up pea patch stock on the west coast
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whlinder
    whlinder Member Posts: 5,385
    Somewhat selective endpoints benefiting us* since we went to the playoff in 2016.
    Still, since Petersen took over and we decided to care about football again we're clearly a top 15-20 program with natty upside, even with Lake sucking, Cohen leopard printing and Deboer backstabbing.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dirtysouwfdawg
    dirtysouwfdawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,564 Swaye's Wigwam
    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    The viewership conversation always crack me up because they're circular arguments. The teams that networks put in the most watched time slots on the most watched channels are unsurprisingly going to draw the most viewers.

    I'm not saying poverty programs like WSU could draw the same numbers if they were given the same prime-time slots, so don't twist.

    Isn’t that the point? It’s why prime was a FOX darling until he started losing and why I could’ve cancelled the pac-12 network after people started realizing these scrappy underdogs are legit.

    I for one love this data as it pertains to my well being but would NEVER share with a client because the argument could then be made to “why would I buy a game if it wasn’t one of these primary people?” Simple, less eyeballs costs less money.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter