Deboer staying in Seattle
Comments
-
this is going to be brutal isnt it
-
DeBoer doesn't seem like the type to go in studio and tell husky fans fuck off to their face
-
how is he going to be in studio when we are currently tracking all of his flights to tuscaloosa
-
Nah, he’d cancel and let the announcement do that for him. I’m considering he’s gone until he’s not. Dude deserves the best in life for giving us the moments he did. If he was to leave for Oregon, however, then he can shove it.Sources said:DeBoer doesn't seem like the type to go in studio and tell husky fans fuck off to their face
-
He’s going to say a lot of cliche “can’t say much” things and then this bored is going to continue this embarassing spiral of over analysis and PMSing more than all of Jordan Reffets 19 daughters combined.
-
He’s going to tell us he’s leaving TO OUR FACE!!
-
Sark was 20 minutes late IIRC
-
is a headline you'd like to see
-
DeBoer is going to use that in person interview to announce he is staying
Sky is falling chicken little dooglets -
Agree. Also, I believe he’d tell the team first.Sources said:DeBoer doesn't seem like the type to go in studio and tell husky fans fuck off to their face
-
He’s not going on the air to say he’s leaving or staying. It’s what he doesn’t say that matters.
-
Is that what your sources are telling you?thechatch said:He’s not going on the air to say he’s leaving or staying. It’s what he doesn’t say that matters.
-
Wow only took a dozen replies to get something coherent in this thread.thechatch said:He’s not going on the air to say he’s leaving or staying. It’s what he doesn’t say that matters.
-
He told them before the game on Monday.Southerndawg said:
Agree. Also, I believe he’d tell the team first.Sources said:DeBoer doesn't seem like the type to go in studio and tell husky fans fuck off to their face
-
I’m already resigned to next week’s poasts about why new UW head coach Willie Fritz will fail miserably.
Seems like old times already. -
NIL at Washington might be in a better place than most schools. This is the only reason I have any level of sanity.
There’s only two programs in the country right now with long-term NIL plans for their athletes - UW and LSU (Hey Scotty!!)
Most schools are pay for play, which UW kind of does, but the laws in our state makes that incredibly difficult. States like Texas and Florida have wrote into legislation that schools CAN work directly with NIL, including coaches. This really pissed off Saban as Alabama is far behind the turn for allowing that same thing - hence their Leerfield NIL Lounge and partnership, but they’re behind the curve.
What LSU and UW are doing includes a trust fund that athletes can access after graduation/NFL, and that fund is invested during their time playing. The more time at the school, the more compound interest, the more money. Along with getting random sponsorship level deals.
NIL is the name of the game now, Kalen seems like the type to want trust funds and finance guys to handle everything while he coaches ball, at Bama - you gotta embrace leerfield and the agents who are constantly in the lounge, the bag will always be talked about on the recruiting trail in the SEC, and with tOSU struggling to get a collective -Michigan is the only competition. -
FTFYTheHB said:I’m already resigned to next week’s poasts about why new UW head coach
Willie FritzChip Kelly will fail miserably.
Seems like old times already. -
Washington had one of the best NIL programs? Then why do we get our shit pushed in with HS recruits? We’re slightly better in the portal but not at the level of the top dogs.theLSkid said:NIL at Washington might be in a better place than most schools. This is the only reason I have any level of sanity.
There’s only two programs in the country right now with long-term NIL plans for their athletes - UW and LSU (Hey Scotty!!)
Most schools are pay for play, which UW kind of does, but the laws in our state makes that incredibly difficult. States like Texas and Florida have wrote into legislation that schools CAN work directly with NIL, including coaches. This really pissed off Saban as Alabama is far behind the turn for allowing that same thing - hence their Leerfield NIL Lounge and partnership, but they’re behind the curve.
What LSU and UW are doing includes a trust fund that athletes can access after graduation/NFL, and that fund is invested during their time playing. The more time at the school, the more compound interest, the more money. Along with getting random sponsorship level deals.
NIL is the name of the game now, Kalen seems like the type to want trust funds and finance guys to handle everything while he coaches ball, at Bama - you gotta embrace leerfield and the agents who are constantly in the lounge, the bag will always be talked about on the recruiting trail in the SEC, and with tOSU struggling to get a collective -Michigan is the only competition.
-
I think the key is UW has a better long term NIL program. A lot of schools are using short term, immediate funds to get guys. ATM comes to mind.DoogWhisperer said:
Washington had one of the best NIL programs? Then why do we get our shit pushed in with HS recruits? We’re slightly better in the portal but not at the level of the top dogs.theLSkid said:NIL at Washington might be in a better place than most schools. This is the only reason I have any level of sanity.
There’s only two programs in the country right now with long-term NIL plans for their athletes - UW and LSU (Hey Scotty!!)
Most schools are pay for play, which UW kind of does, but the laws in our state makes that incredibly difficult. States like Texas and Florida have wrote into legislation that schools CAN work directly with NIL, including coaches. This really pissed off Saban as Alabama is far behind the turn for allowing that same thing - hence their Leerfield NIL Lounge and partnership, but they’re behind the curve.
What LSU and UW are doing includes a trust fund that athletes can access after graduation/NFL, and that fund is invested during their time playing. The more time at the school, the more compound interest, the more money. Along with getting random sponsorship level deals.
NIL is the name of the game now, Kalen seems like the type to want trust funds and finance guys to handle everything while he coaches ball, at Bama - you gotta embrace leerfield and the agents who are constantly in the lounge, the bag will always be talked about on the recruiting trail in the SEC, and with tOSU struggling to get a collective -Michigan is the only competition. -
Washington doesn't do NIL for high school stars horoscope talent rouletteDoogWhisperer said:
Washington had one of the best NIL programs? Then why do we get our shit pushed in with HS recruits? We’re slightly better in the portal but not at the level of the top dogs.theLSkid said:NIL at Washington might be in a better place than most schools. This is the only reason I have any level of sanity.
There’s only two programs in the country right now with long-term NIL plans for their athletes - UW and LSU (Hey Scotty!!)
Most schools are pay for play, which UW kind of does, but the laws in our state makes that incredibly difficult. States like Texas and Florida have wrote into legislation that schools CAN work directly with NIL, including coaches. This really pissed off Saban as Alabama is far behind the turn for allowing that same thing - hence their Leerfield NIL Lounge and partnership, but they’re behind the curve.
What LSU and UW are doing includes a trust fund that athletes can access after graduation/NFL, and that fund is invested during their time playing. The more time at the school, the more compound interest, the more money. Along with getting random sponsorship level deals.
NIL is the name of the game now, Kalen seems like the type to want trust funds and finance guys to handle everything while he coaches ball, at Bama - you gotta embrace leerfield and the agents who are constantly in the lounge, the bag will always be talked about on the recruiting trail in the SEC, and with tOSU struggling to get a collective -Michigan is the only competition.
UW is ELITE at NIL for proven players -
Which would leak this evening.Southerndawg said:
Agree. Also, I believe he’d tell the team first.Sources said:DeBoer doesn't seem like the type to go in studio and tell husky fans fuck off to their face
-
You could say they are elite at evaluating the transfers, which is all Deboer. But cash pool wise, don't think that is remotely true.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Washington doesn't do NIL for high school stars horoscope talent rouletteDoogWhisperer said:
Washington had one of the best NIL programs? Then why do we get our shit pushed in with HS recruits? We’re slightly better in the portal but not at the level of the top dogs.theLSkid said:NIL at Washington might be in a better place than most schools. This is the only reason I have any level of sanity.
There’s only two programs in the country right now with long-term NIL plans for their athletes - UW and LSU (Hey Scotty!!)
Most schools are pay for play, which UW kind of does, but the laws in our state makes that incredibly difficult. States like Texas and Florida have wrote into legislation that schools CAN work directly with NIL, including coaches. This really pissed off Saban as Alabama is far behind the turn for allowing that same thing - hence their Leerfield NIL Lounge and partnership, but they’re behind the curve.
What LSU and UW are doing includes a trust fund that athletes can access after graduation/NFL, and that fund is invested during their time playing. The more time at the school, the more compound interest, the more money. Along with getting random sponsorship level deals.
NIL is the name of the game now, Kalen seems like the type to want trust funds and finance guys to handle everything while he coaches ball, at Bama - you gotta embrace leerfield and the agents who are constantly in the lounge, the bag will always be talked about on the recruiting trail in the SEC, and with tOSU struggling to get a collective -Michigan is the only competition.
UW is ELITE at NIL for proven players -
There’s a difference between pay for play and long term NIL.DoogWhisperer said:
Washington had one of the best NIL programs? Then why do we get our shit pushed in with HS recruits? We’re slightly better in the portal but not at the level of the top dogs.theLSkid said:NIL at Washington might be in a better place than most schools. This is the only reason I have any level of sanity.
There’s only two programs in the country right now with long-term NIL plans for their athletes - UW and LSU (Hey Scotty!!)
Most schools are pay for play, which UW kind of does, but the laws in our state makes that incredibly difficult. States like Texas and Florida have wrote into legislation that schools CAN work directly with NIL, including coaches. This really pissed off Saban as Alabama is far behind the turn for allowing that same thing - hence their Leerfield NIL Lounge and partnership, but they’re behind the curve.
What LSU and UW are doing includes a trust fund that athletes can access after graduation/NFL, and that fund is invested during their time playing. The more time at the school, the more compound interest, the more money. Along with getting random sponsorship level deals.
NIL is the name of the game now, Kalen seems like the type to want trust funds and finance guys to handle everything while he coaches ball, at Bama - you gotta embrace leerfield and the agents who are constantly in the lounge, the bag will always be talked about on the recruiting trail in the SEC, and with tOSU struggling to get a collective -Michigan is the only competition.
If you want the real reason - it’s because UW hasn’t had a national brand and nobody outside of the west coast wants to visit a city like seattle.
-
No one wants to visit seattle?theLSkid said:
There’s a difference between pay for play and long term NIL.DoogWhisperer said:
Washington had one of the best NIL programs? Then why do we get our shit pushed in with HS recruits? We’re slightly better in the portal but not at the level of the top dogs.theLSkid said:NIL at Washington might be in a better place than most schools. This is the only reason I have any level of sanity.
There’s only two programs in the country right now with long-term NIL plans for their athletes - UW and LSU (Hey Scotty!!)
Most schools are pay for play, which UW kind of does, but the laws in our state makes that incredibly difficult. States like Texas and Florida have wrote into legislation that schools CAN work directly with NIL, including coaches. This really pissed off Saban as Alabama is far behind the turn for allowing that same thing - hence their Leerfield NIL Lounge and partnership, but they’re behind the curve.
What LSU and UW are doing includes a trust fund that athletes can access after graduation/NFL, and that fund is invested during their time playing. The more time at the school, the more compound interest, the more money. Along with getting random sponsorship level deals.
NIL is the name of the game now, Kalen seems like the type to want trust funds and finance guys to handle everything while he coaches ball, at Bama - you gotta embrace leerfield and the agents who are constantly in the lounge, the bag will always be talked about on the recruiting trail in the SEC, and with tOSU struggling to get a collective -Michigan is the only competition.
If you want the real reason - it’s because UW hasn’t had a national brand and nobody outside of the west coast wants to visit a city like seattle.
Hilarious
I forget how retarded this place is sometimes
-
People will just take it as a granted that Alabama will get who Alabama wants until the day that Alabama announces that Tommy Rees has been promoted to head coach.
Lanning was listed as high as -500 just this morning. Then, Lanning announces he doesn’t want the job, so all of a sudden DeBoer becomes the -275 favorite. It’s ridiculous.
DeBoer doesn’t even have Alabama ties-or SEC ties at all- like Lanning does. I really am clueless about where this rumor is coming from. -
I heard Phil Knight is funding the buyout.
-
Would be hilarous if Deboer was out fishing all day, clueless to the rumor, then comes home to see Fudgie crying on his front lawn.
-
Social media paints seattle in the same light as portland. I spent some time in the south over December and anyone who asked where I was from after I said “Washington” would say “not seattle right?”… I love seattle, but it’s not the same anymore. Go ahead and have lunch near pukes place, first time I’ve ever seen a homeless man jerking it in broad daylight on a sidewalk. At least go under a bridge.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
No one wants to visit seattle?theLSkid said:
There’s a difference between pay for play and long term NIL.DoogWhisperer said:
Washington had one of the best NIL programs? Then why do we get our shit pushed in with HS recruits? We’re slightly better in the portal but not at the level of the top dogs.theLSkid said:NIL at Washington might be in a better place than most schools. This is the only reason I have any level of sanity.
There’s only two programs in the country right now with long-term NIL plans for their athletes - UW and LSU (Hey Scotty!!)
Most schools are pay for play, which UW kind of does, but the laws in our state makes that incredibly difficult. States like Texas and Florida have wrote into legislation that schools CAN work directly with NIL, including coaches. This really pissed off Saban as Alabama is far behind the turn for allowing that same thing - hence their Leerfield NIL Lounge and partnership, but they’re behind the curve.
What LSU and UW are doing includes a trust fund that athletes can access after graduation/NFL, and that fund is invested during their time playing. The more time at the school, the more compound interest, the more money. Along with getting random sponsorship level deals.
NIL is the name of the game now, Kalen seems like the type to want trust funds and finance guys to handle everything while he coaches ball, at Bama - you gotta embrace leerfield and the agents who are constantly in the lounge, the bag will always be talked about on the recruiting trail in the SEC, and with tOSU struggling to get a collective -Michigan is the only competition.
If you want the real reason - it’s because UW hasn’t had a national brand and nobody outside of the west coast wants to visit a city like seattle.
Hilarious
I forget how retarded this place is sometimes
-
Your social media?theLSkid said:
Social media paints seattle in the same light as portland. I spent some time in the south over December and anyone who asked where I was from after I said “Washington” would say “not seattle right?”… I love seattle, but it’s not the same anymore. Go ahead and have lunch near pukes place, first time I’ve ever seen a homeless man jerking it in broad daylight on a sidewalk. At least go under a bridge.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
No one wants to visit seattle?theLSkid said:
There’s a difference between pay for play and long term NIL.DoogWhisperer said:
Washington had one of the best NIL programs? Then why do we get our shit pushed in with HS recruits? We’re slightly better in the portal but not at the level of the top dogs.theLSkid said:NIL at Washington might be in a better place than most schools. This is the only reason I have any level of sanity.
There’s only two programs in the country right now with long-term NIL plans for their athletes - UW and LSU (Hey Scotty!!)
Most schools are pay for play, which UW kind of does, but the laws in our state makes that incredibly difficult. States like Texas and Florida have wrote into legislation that schools CAN work directly with NIL, including coaches. This really pissed off Saban as Alabama is far behind the turn for allowing that same thing - hence their Leerfield NIL Lounge and partnership, but they’re behind the curve.
What LSU and UW are doing includes a trust fund that athletes can access after graduation/NFL, and that fund is invested during their time playing. The more time at the school, the more compound interest, the more money. Along with getting random sponsorship level deals.
NIL is the name of the game now, Kalen seems like the type to want trust funds and finance guys to handle everything while he coaches ball, at Bama - you gotta embrace leerfield and the agents who are constantly in the lounge, the bag will always be talked about on the recruiting trail in the SEC, and with tOSU struggling to get a collective -Michigan is the only competition.
If you want the real reason - it’s because UW hasn’t had a national brand and nobody outside of the west coast wants to visit a city like seattle.
Hilarious
I forget how retarded this place is sometimes
Case closed
