Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Deboer staying in Seattle

135

Comments

  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,764

    theLSkid said:

    NIL at Washington might be in a better place than most schools. This is the only reason I have any level of sanity.

    There’s only two programs in the country right now with long-term NIL plans for their athletes - UW and LSU (Hey Scotty!!)

    Most schools are pay for play, which UW kind of does, but the laws in our state makes that incredibly difficult. States like Texas and Florida have wrote into legislation that schools CAN work directly with NIL, including coaches. This really pissed off Saban as Alabama is far behind the turn for allowing that same thing - hence their Leerfield NIL Lounge and partnership, but they’re behind the curve.

    What LSU and UW are doing includes a trust fund that athletes can access after graduation/NFL, and that fund is invested during their time playing. The more time at the school, the more compound interest, the more money. Along with getting random sponsorship level deals.

    NIL is the name of the game now, Kalen seems like the type to want trust funds and finance guys to handle everything while he coaches ball, at Bama - you gotta embrace leerfield and the agents who are constantly in the lounge, the bag will always be talked about on the recruiting trail in the SEC, and with tOSU struggling to get a collective -Michigan is the only competition.

    Washington had one of the best NIL programs? Then why do we get our shit pushed in with HS recruits? We’re slightly better in the portal but not at the level of the top dogs.
    Washington doesn't do NIL for high school stars horoscope talent roulette

    UW is ELITE at NIL for proven players
  • dirtysouwfdawg
    dirtysouwfdawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,639 Swaye's Wigwam

    Sources said:

    DeBoer doesn't seem like the type to go in studio and tell husky fans fuck off to their face

    Agree. Also, I believe he’d tell the team first.
    Which would leak this evening.
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,324 Founders Club

    theLSkid said:

    NIL at Washington might be in a better place than most schools. This is the only reason I have any level of sanity.

    There’s only two programs in the country right now with long-term NIL plans for their athletes - UW and LSU (Hey Scotty!!)

    Most schools are pay for play, which UW kind of does, but the laws in our state makes that incredibly difficult. States like Texas and Florida have wrote into legislation that schools CAN work directly with NIL, including coaches. This really pissed off Saban as Alabama is far behind the turn for allowing that same thing - hence their Leerfield NIL Lounge and partnership, but they’re behind the curve.

    What LSU and UW are doing includes a trust fund that athletes can access after graduation/NFL, and that fund is invested during their time playing. The more time at the school, the more compound interest, the more money. Along with getting random sponsorship level deals.

    NIL is the name of the game now, Kalen seems like the type to want trust funds and finance guys to handle everything while he coaches ball, at Bama - you gotta embrace leerfield and the agents who are constantly in the lounge, the bag will always be talked about on the recruiting trail in the SEC, and with tOSU struggling to get a collective -Michigan is the only competition.

    Washington had one of the best NIL programs? Then why do we get our shit pushed in with HS recruits? We’re slightly better in the portal but not at the level of the top dogs.
    Washington doesn't do NIL for high school stars horoscope talent roulette

    UW is ELITE at NIL for proven players
    You could say they are elite at evaluating the transfers, which is all Deboer. But cash pool wise, don't think that is remotely true.
  • theLSkid
    theLSkid Member Posts: 344

    theLSkid said:

    NIL at Washington might be in a better place than most schools. This is the only reason I have any level of sanity.

    There’s only two programs in the country right now with long-term NIL plans for their athletes - UW and LSU (Hey Scotty!!)

    Most schools are pay for play, which UW kind of does, but the laws in our state makes that incredibly difficult. States like Texas and Florida have wrote into legislation that schools CAN work directly with NIL, including coaches. This really pissed off Saban as Alabama is far behind the turn for allowing that same thing - hence their Leerfield NIL Lounge and partnership, but they’re behind the curve.

    What LSU and UW are doing includes a trust fund that athletes can access after graduation/NFL, and that fund is invested during their time playing. The more time at the school, the more compound interest, the more money. Along with getting random sponsorship level deals.

    NIL is the name of the game now, Kalen seems like the type to want trust funds and finance guys to handle everything while he coaches ball, at Bama - you gotta embrace leerfield and the agents who are constantly in the lounge, the bag will always be talked about on the recruiting trail in the SEC, and with tOSU struggling to get a collective -Michigan is the only competition.

    Washington had one of the best NIL programs? Then why do we get our shit pushed in with HS recruits? We’re slightly better in the portal but not at the level of the top dogs.
    There’s a difference between pay for play and long term NIL.

    If you want the real reason - it’s because UW hasn’t had a national brand and nobody outside of the west coast wants to visit a city like seattle.

  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,764
    theLSkid said:

    theLSkid said:

    NIL at Washington might be in a better place than most schools. This is the only reason I have any level of sanity.

    There’s only two programs in the country right now with long-term NIL plans for their athletes - UW and LSU (Hey Scotty!!)

    Most schools are pay for play, which UW kind of does, but the laws in our state makes that incredibly difficult. States like Texas and Florida have wrote into legislation that schools CAN work directly with NIL, including coaches. This really pissed off Saban as Alabama is far behind the turn for allowing that same thing - hence their Leerfield NIL Lounge and partnership, but they’re behind the curve.

    What LSU and UW are doing includes a trust fund that athletes can access after graduation/NFL, and that fund is invested during their time playing. The more time at the school, the more compound interest, the more money. Along with getting random sponsorship level deals.

    NIL is the name of the game now, Kalen seems like the type to want trust funds and finance guys to handle everything while he coaches ball, at Bama - you gotta embrace leerfield and the agents who are constantly in the lounge, the bag will always be talked about on the recruiting trail in the SEC, and with tOSU struggling to get a collective -Michigan is the only competition.

    Washington had one of the best NIL programs? Then why do we get our shit pushed in with HS recruits? We’re slightly better in the portal but not at the level of the top dogs.
    There’s a difference between pay for play and long term NIL.

    If you want the real reason - it’s because UW hasn’t had a national brand and nobody outside of the west coast wants to visit a city like seattle.

    No one wants to visit seattle?

    Hilarious

    I forget how retarded this place is sometimes

  • Sandra6
    Sandra6 Member Posts: 151
    People will just take it as a granted that Alabama will get who Alabama wants until the day that Alabama announces that Tommy Rees has been promoted to head coach.

    Lanning was listed as high as -500 just this morning. Then, Lanning announces he doesn’t want the job, so all of a sudden DeBoer becomes the -275 favorite. It’s ridiculous.

    DeBoer doesn’t even have Alabama ties-or SEC ties at all- like Lanning does. I really am clueless about where this rumor is coming from.
  • LawDawg1
    LawDawg1 Member Posts: 3,946
    I heard Phil Knight is funding the buyout.
  • theLSkid
    theLSkid Member Posts: 344

    theLSkid said:

    theLSkid said:

    NIL at Washington might be in a better place than most schools. This is the only reason I have any level of sanity.

    There’s only two programs in the country right now with long-term NIL plans for their athletes - UW and LSU (Hey Scotty!!)

    Most schools are pay for play, which UW kind of does, but the laws in our state makes that incredibly difficult. States like Texas and Florida have wrote into legislation that schools CAN work directly with NIL, including coaches. This really pissed off Saban as Alabama is far behind the turn for allowing that same thing - hence their Leerfield NIL Lounge and partnership, but they’re behind the curve.

    What LSU and UW are doing includes a trust fund that athletes can access after graduation/NFL, and that fund is invested during their time playing. The more time at the school, the more compound interest, the more money. Along with getting random sponsorship level deals.

    NIL is the name of the game now, Kalen seems like the type to want trust funds and finance guys to handle everything while he coaches ball, at Bama - you gotta embrace leerfield and the agents who are constantly in the lounge, the bag will always be talked about on the recruiting trail in the SEC, and with tOSU struggling to get a collective -Michigan is the only competition.

    Washington had one of the best NIL programs? Then why do we get our shit pushed in with HS recruits? We’re slightly better in the portal but not at the level of the top dogs.
    There’s a difference between pay for play and long term NIL.

    If you want the real reason - it’s because UW hasn’t had a national brand and nobody outside of the west coast wants to visit a city like seattle.

    No one wants to visit seattle?

    Hilarious

    I forget how retarded this place is sometimes

    Social media paints seattle in the same light as portland. I spent some time in the south over December and anyone who asked where I was from after I said “Washington” would say “not seattle right?”… I love seattle, but it’s not the same anymore. Go ahead and have lunch near pukes place, first time I’ve ever seen a homeless man jerking it in broad daylight on a sidewalk. At least go under a bridge.

  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,764
    theLSkid said:

    theLSkid said:

    theLSkid said:

    NIL at Washington might be in a better place than most schools. This is the only reason I have any level of sanity.

    There’s only two programs in the country right now with long-term NIL plans for their athletes - UW and LSU (Hey Scotty!!)

    Most schools are pay for play, which UW kind of does, but the laws in our state makes that incredibly difficult. States like Texas and Florida have wrote into legislation that schools CAN work directly with NIL, including coaches. This really pissed off Saban as Alabama is far behind the turn for allowing that same thing - hence their Leerfield NIL Lounge and partnership, but they’re behind the curve.

    What LSU and UW are doing includes a trust fund that athletes can access after graduation/NFL, and that fund is invested during their time playing. The more time at the school, the more compound interest, the more money. Along with getting random sponsorship level deals.

    NIL is the name of the game now, Kalen seems like the type to want trust funds and finance guys to handle everything while he coaches ball, at Bama - you gotta embrace leerfield and the agents who are constantly in the lounge, the bag will always be talked about on the recruiting trail in the SEC, and with tOSU struggling to get a collective -Michigan is the only competition.

    Washington had one of the best NIL programs? Then why do we get our shit pushed in with HS recruits? We’re slightly better in the portal but not at the level of the top dogs.
    There’s a difference between pay for play and long term NIL.

    If you want the real reason - it’s because UW hasn’t had a national brand and nobody outside of the west coast wants to visit a city like seattle.

    No one wants to visit seattle?

    Hilarious

    I forget how retarded this place is sometimes

    Social media paints seattle in the same light as portland. I spent some time in the south over December and anyone who asked where I was from after I said “Washington” would say “not seattle right?”… I love seattle, but it’s not the same anymore. Go ahead and have lunch near pukes place, first time I’ve ever seen a homeless man jerking it in broad daylight on a sidewalk. At least go under a bridge.

    Your social media?

    Case closed