A Q for the board..
Since Sark is a great recruiter (everyone says so), is Petersen inheriting a stocked cupboard? Or the bigger question, did Petersen walk into a team with more raw talent that Sark? I think at some positions yes and others certainly not. I give the edge to Sark inheriting more talent than Petersen. I could be wrong, but given how bad willingham was and how supposedly great Sark was, this shouldn't even be a debatable topic.
Comments
-
I definitely think the top-to-bottom talent Peterman inherited is a bit better. But you fucking nailed it:MikeDamone said:
...given how bad willingham was and how supposedly great Sark was, this shouldn't even be a debatable topic...
-
Sark went to a team stocked with 5 star offensive lineman in USC.
Peterman went to a team with barely enough 2 star offensive lineman to field a team. -
You lack reading comprehension.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Sark went to a team stocked with 5 star offensive lineman in USC.
Peterman went to a team with barely enough 2 star offensive lineman to field a team. -
Stop plagiarism puppy's takes from three weeks ago Da Moan.MikeDamone said:we know the Doog and Troojan line that when sark took over he inherited a bare cupboard. But he is such a great coach and recruiter he made them into a respectable team.
Since Sark is a great recruiter (everyone says so), is Petersen inheriting a stocked cupboard? Or the bigger question, did Petersen walk into a team with more raw talent that Sark? I think at some positions yes and others certainly not. I give the edge to Sark inheriting more talent than Petersen. I could be wrong, but given how bad willingham was and how supposedly great Sark was, this shouldn't even be a debatable topic. -
Wtf?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Sark went to a team stocked with 5 star offensive lineman in USC.
Peterman went to a team with barely enough 2 star offensive lineman to field a team. -
I didn't see it. What was the consensus?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stop plagiarism puppy's takes from three weeks ago Da Moan.MikeDamone said:we know the Doog and Troojan line that when sark took over he inherited a bare cupboard. But he is such a great coach and recruiter he made them into a respectable team.
Since Sark is a great recruiter (everyone says so), is Petersen inheriting a stocked cupboard? Or the bigger question, did Petersen walk into a team with more raw talent that Sark? I think at some positions yes and others certainly not. I give the edge to Sark inheriting more talent than Petersen. I could be wrong, but given how bad willingham was and how supposedly great Sark was, this shouldn't even be a debatable topic. -
This team is more talented than what Sark inherited IMHO. But Sark had a huge advantage in Lockner.
As much as I hate Lockner, he was better from day 1 than Miley or Lindquist will ever be.
If Lockner was on this team it wouldn't be 10 wins it would final four playoffs or gtfo. -
Disagree. Lockner would still shit the bed two games a year.allpurpleallgold said:This team is more talented than what Sark inherited IMHO. But Sark had a huge advantage in Lockner.
As much as I hate Lockner, he was better from day 1 than Miley or Lindquist will ever be.
If Lockner was on this team it wouldn't be 10 wins it would final four playoffs or gtfo. -
You poasted a spreadsheet a few weeks ago that someone spoonfed you on another forum that showed Ty's NFL talent that Sark took credit for.
I will fucking guarantee that that list is 2:1 in favor of Ty in a few years. -
Even without a top tier running back? Sark had locker and Polk.allpurpleallgold said:This team is more talented than what Sark inherited IMHO. But Sark had a huge advantage in Lockner.
As much as I hate Lockner, he was better from day 1 than Miley or Lindquist will ever be.
If Lockner was on this team it wouldn't be 10 wins it would final four playoffs or gtfo.
