Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

A Q for the board..

2»

Comments

  • EsophagealFeces
    EsophagealFeces Member Posts: 13,169
    Baseman said:

    Sark left this team in far better shape than when he took over.

    Some of you blowhards--aheem---Aubs thought this was a natty squad waiting to happen with our new BBryant Coach.

    The reality is girls, we are pretenders, not contenders. Weare really screwed next year when Danny Shaq and MPete leave.

    sorry the young 4 stars on this team, save John Ross aint difference makers. There might be some linemen among the young kids but remember no Ivan to make them road graders and war daddies.

    We need some trickery and skullduggry to keep the facade going to get some talent in for Pete to mold (Which I think he'll do)

    What say yous?

    I say that you contradicted the shit outta yourself and made no sense. Did Sark leave us in better shape than when he got here, or did he leave us with a bunch of highly rated turds? Which is it? Also, fuck off for trying to lump AuburnDoog in with us.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    MikeDamone said:

    Here is the 2009 starting O. Who to you trade out for yesterday's starting offense?

    Locker starts
    Polk starts
    Aguilar starts
    Schaefer/Ossi (lol) -- hatchie
    Christine/Wood lol
    Kelemete starts
    Habban either/or coleman shelton
    Middleton -- probably starts, fuck
    Johnson -- Ross
    Kearse starts (campbell/hall jr)

    6/11 of Ty's recruits would start, including all skill players except for Ross. Total clusterfuck.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
    edited September 2014
    CuntWaffle said:

    Petersen recruited Baker so does he really count? Budda would be a duck or bruin if Sark stayed. I thought we were comparing Sark and Peterman by the players they each inherited.

    True. But by the same logic, you need to take the best player -- Trufant -- off the '09 defense.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    MikeDamone said:

    I think the consensus is the person regarded as the worst coach in UW history left about as much talent to the guy who was the great recruiter as the great recruiter left to the next guy. Fuck that narrative and anyone who buys into it with a rusty conical cheese grater. My whole point is I am not down on Petersen, but just pointing out he has just as difficult a task as sark had.

    That actually compliments Sark's schematic ability, while taking a blowtorch to his developmental ability. But then again we already knew that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,147
    The depth of the team now is much better. Top level talent is close. In '09, the talent at QB, RB, and WR was better. Locker > Miles. Polk is easily better than any RB we have. Kearse, James Johnson, Aguillar, and Goodwin are better than Kasen, Mickens, Campbell, and Ross. Ross is a weapon becuase of his speed, but he hasn't shown that much as a WR. The OL is better now, but neither one is good.

    The DL now is a lot better. Talia Crichton started as a freshman. The 2009 LB's starters are probably slightly better, but they had no depth at all. The secondary now is a lot better. The '09 secondary was terrible. I would rather have this year's roster, but the fact that it is a debate is kind of pathetic.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,730 Founders Club
    RoadDawg55 said:

    The depth of the team now is much better. Top level talent is close. In '09, the talent at QB, RB, and WR was better. Locker > Miles. Polk is easily better than any RB we have. Kearse, James Johnson, Aguillar, and Goodwin are better than Kasen, Mickens, Campbell, and Ross. Ross is a weapon becuase of his speed, but he hasn't shown that much as a WR. The OL is better now, but neither one is good.

    The DL now is a lot better. Talia Crichton started as a freshman. The 2009 LB's starters are probably slightly better, but they had no depth at all. The secondary now is a lot better. The '09 secondary was terrible. I would rather have this year's roster, but the fact that it is a debate is kind of pathetic.

    I'm worried Ross will be a Devin Hester/tedd Ginn type that only gives us action in the return game, but not as a receiver
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • JaWarrenJaHooker
    JaWarrenJaHooker Member Posts: 2,122
    Glad we're back to talking football on this board
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter