Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
A Q for the board..
Comments
-
He actually said it four weeks ago:
http://forum.hardcorehusky.com/discussion/11949/told-u-bitches-sark-took-over-a-better-team-in-09 -
Since I have no life maybe tomorrow I'll do a position by position breakdown. I'd do it now but I'm drinking. Better to do it during work hours.
Again, the fact that this is even a topic is astonishing. -
Sounds like you dismissed the notion at the time.TierbsHsotBoobs said:He actually said it four weeks ago:
http://forum.hardcorehusky.com/discussion/11949/told-u-bitches-sark-took-over-a-better-team-in-09 -
If he lost 2 games because Jack shit the bed I'd be willing to AuburnDoog my expectations. He is a complete fucking loser so you're probably right.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Disagree. Lockner would still shit the bed two games a year.allpurpleallgold said:This team is more talented than what Sark inherited IMHO. But Sark had a huge advantage in Lockner.
As much as I hate Lockner, he was better from day 1 than Miley or Lindquist will ever be.
If Lockner was on this team it wouldn't be 10 wins it would final four playoffs or gtfo. -
Washington and Coleman will never be Polk/Sankey level backs. But they're good enough to win with. They certainly weren't the problem yesterday.MikeDamone said:Even without a top tier running back? Sark had locker and Polk.
-
Here is the 2009 starting O. Who to you trade out for yesterday's starting offense?
Locker
Polk
Aguilar
Schaefer/Ossi (lol)
Christine/Wood
Kelemete
Habban
Middleton
Johnson
Kearse.
-
It's really strange to say this, but outside of Stringfellow's half year and Kasen, WIllingham's receivers were a lot better. Defensive talent is miles (lol) ahead right now at the top end (Shelton, Shaq, Peters), but the middle and bottom are not any better (Scott Lawyer, Evan Hudson, wtf?).
-
2009 defense. Who do you replace with yesterday's starters?
Te’o-Nesheim
Ta’amu
Elisara
Jones
Savannah
Butler
Foster
Aiyewa
Fellner
Trufant
Richardson -
Polk and Sankey were two of the best backs in UW history. Even with shitty lines. They gave the offense something defenses had to always fear and respect. Coleman and Washington types are on the two and three deeps of every team in the pac 12.TTJ said:
Washington and Coleman will never be Polk/Sankey level backs. But they're good enough to win with. They certainly weren't the problem yesterday.MikeDamone said:Even without a top tier running back? Sark had locker and Polk.
-
Te’o-Nesheim -- Jamora
Ta’amu -- Shelton
Elisara -- Gaines/Qualls, lipo
Jones -- Te'o Nesheim
Savannah -- Shaq
Butler starts
Foster starts
Aiyewa starts
Fellner -- Baker
Trufant starts
Richardson -- Peters
So 5/11? Not a drastic difference.
Agree, not crazy about Coleman behind this line.MikeDamone said:
Polk and Sankey were two of the best backs in UW history. Even with shitty lines. They gave the offense something defenses had to always fear and respect. Coleman and Washington types are on the two and three deeps of every team in the pac 12.TTJ said:
Washington and Coleman will never be Polk/Sankey level backs. But they're good enough to win with. They certainly weren't the problem yesterday.MikeDamone said:Even without a top tier running back? Sark had locker and Polk.
