Stanford wrap-up
Comments
-
They weren't a good team last year and they're worse this year.RoadDawg55 said:
Somehow with Shaw, they've made 3 straight BCS bowls. They have a tough schedule this year, but they are a good team.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Unless Stanford fired Shaw, they're still fucked.haie said:
I'll still take Stanford's D over every pac12 offense this season. Dominant D-line, best open-field tackling by a mile, always in position to make a play. Their offense isn't special but it doesn't need to be. Shaw being arrogant against USC doesn't change that.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.dnc said:
disagreeTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.allpurpleallgold said:
And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.MisterEm said:
Disagree.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.
The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.
HTH
Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion.
Hope this helps. -
dude you are fucking legitimately retarded sometimesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Unless Stanford fired Shaw, they're still fucked.haie said:
I'll still take Stanford's D over every pac12 offense this season. Dominant D-line, best open-field tackling by a mile, always in position to make a play. Their offense isn't special but it doesn't need to be. Shaw being arrogant against USC doesn't change that.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.dnc said:
disagreeTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.allpurpleallgold said:
And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.MisterEm said:
Disagree.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.
The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.
HTH
Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion.
Shaw isn't perfect, but he's way better than you give him credit for. -
He set the 2012 national championship on fire by playing Nunes.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
dude you are fucking legitimately retarded sometimesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Unless Stanford fired Shaw, they're still fucked.haie said:
I'll still take Stanford's D over every pac12 offense this season. Dominant D-line, best open-field tackling by a mile, always in position to make a play. Their offense isn't special but it doesn't need to be. Shaw being arrogant against USC doesn't change that.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.dnc said:
disagreeTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.allpurpleallgold said:
And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.MisterEm said:
Disagree.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.
The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.
HTH
Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion.
Shaw isn't perfect, but he's way better than you give him credit for.
He backed into choking the Rose Bowl last year.
He's already lost at home to Sark this year.
HTH -
Sounds terrible. It's fucking Stanford man, they're a woman's basketball and water polo school.
-
Dude you are the type of guy that probably critiques a 10/10 for having a mole on her fucking shoulderTierbsHsotBoobs said:
He set the 2012 national championship on fire by playing Nunes.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
dude you are fucking legitimately retarded sometimesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Unless Stanford fired Shaw, they're still fucked.haie said:
I'll still take Stanford's D over every pac12 offense this season. Dominant D-line, best open-field tackling by a mile, always in position to make a play. Their offense isn't special but it doesn't need to be. Shaw being arrogant against USC doesn't change that.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.dnc said:
disagreeTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.allpurpleallgold said:
And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.MisterEm said:
Disagree.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.
The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.
HTH
Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion.
Shaw isn't perfect, but he's way better than you give him credit for.
He backed into choking the Rose Bowl last year.
He's already lost at home to Sark this year.
HTH -
The annoyer of all is really fucking annoying today.
-
Considering what Shaw inherited from Harbaugh, his run has been disappointing.
This bored has apparently never heard of Lloyd Carr and Larry Coker. -
Stanford is good, but not that good. They were good enough to expose a lot of our weaknesses, but that wasn't last year's Stanford. Definitely not Harbaugh's Stanford. So maybe that just goes to show how far we have to go. Luckily, we have a coach that can get us to improve over the course of the season. I still think we can win 10 games this year. Maybe it's the doog in me, but I haven't been impressed with many teams in the Pac-12 and I think we have a shot at a decent conference record.
Also, I think it should be said that Pete needs another offseason to really get these guys playing at (or somewhere closer to) the level that we expect them to. He knows what excellence looks like and what we need to do to get there. -
Lloyd Carr won an NC, and was probably the ceiling of the Michigan program in modernity.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Considering what Shaw inherited from Harbaugh, his run has been disappointing.
This bored has apparently never heard of Lloyd Carr and Larry Coker.
I bet Michigan fans would've LOVED to have Carr these past 7 seasons, App State game be damned. -
If Harbaugh was still coaching that Stanford team, they run us out of the fucking stadium. Simple fact.
