Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Stanford wrap-up

Swaye
Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,741 Founders Club
Almost died drinking last night in a useless attempt to make Cyler play worth a fuck. Passed out in the 4th, and thankfully never even saw the fake punt of Miles fucktarded play. Getting on a plane to Boston with a fucking shitshow of a hangover. All for nothing. FYFMFE.

For anyone talking shit on Smith for play calling, what the fuck do you expect? When you have a QB you know can't consistently make D1 throws downfield, never makes it past the first read in a progression, and starts running for his life when nobody is within 7 yards of him, how do you game plan around that?

I have the 4th quarter recorded, but I might just say fuck it and wait for the HH podcast to have that shitshow dissected.

D played great, from what I recall. Which isn't much past halftime. ST was sort of shitty (surprised me). At the end of the day, either we need to go with a different QB, or Miles needs to "get it." With yesterday's QB play we are a 7 win team, even with a punishing and tenacious D. Sark is a great recruiter, everyone says so. My useless as fuck .02. I need to get to Boston quick so I can drink this hangover away. Fuck off.
«134

Comments

  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685

    There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

    They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

    Disagree.

    The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.

    HTH
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    MisterEm said:

    There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

    They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

    Disagree.

    The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.

    HTH
    Good thing he specifically said he was talking about the offense.

  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    MisterEm said:

    There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

    They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

    Disagree.

    The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.

    HTH
    And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    MisterEm said:

    There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

    They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

    Disagree.

    The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.

    HTH
    And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.
    Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855

    MisterEm said:

    There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

    They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

    Disagree.

    The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.

    HTH
    And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.
    Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.
    disagree

  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    dnc said:

    MisterEm said:

    There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

    They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

    Disagree.

    The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.

    HTH
    And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.
    Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.
    disagree

    Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.

    Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855

    dnc said:

    MisterEm said:

    There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

    They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

    Disagree.

    The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.

    HTH
    And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.
    Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.
    disagree

    Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.

    Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion.
    It was a terrible loss, and it certainly means they're not great, but that's still a good team.