Stanford wrap-up
For anyone talking shit on Smith for play calling, what the fuck do you expect? When you have a QB you know can't consistently make D1 throws downfield, never makes it past the first read in a progression, and starts running for his life when nobody is within 7 yards of him, how do you game plan around that?
I have the 4th quarter recorded, but I might just say fuck it and wait for the HH podcast to have that shitshow dissected.
D played great, from what I recall. Which isn't much past halftime. ST was sort of shitty (surprised me). At the end of the day, either we need to go with a different QB, or Miles needs to "get it." With yesterday's QB play we are a 7 win team, even with a punishing and tenacious D. Sark is a great recruiter, everyone says so. My useless as fuck .02. I need to get to Boston quick so I can drink this hangover away. Fuck off.
Comments
-
There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out. -
Disagree.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.
The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.
HTH
-
Good thing he specifically said he was talking about the offense.MisterEm said:
Disagree.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.
The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.
HTH
-
We're just lucky that Swaye is alive enough to poast here at all.
-
And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.MisterEm said:
Disagree.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.
The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.
HTH -
Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.allpurpleallgold said:
And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.MisterEm said:
Disagree.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.
The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.
HTH
-
disagreeTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.allpurpleallgold said:
And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.MisterEm said:
Disagree.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.
The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.
HTH
-
Some people forget that our defense always looks good against Stanford
-
Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.dnc said:
disagreeTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.allpurpleallgold said:
And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.MisterEm said:
Disagree.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.
The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.
HTH
Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion. -
It was a terrible loss, and it certainly means they're not great, but that's still a good team.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.dnc said:
disagreeTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.allpurpleallgold said:
And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.MisterEm said:
Disagree.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.
The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.
HTH
Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion.
-
Outside of the QB, on offense I was high on DWash at tb before the season but for the life of me I have no idea why he deserved to start vs Stanford. LColeman should be the first option because he runs downhill while DW and his clear fumbling issues would be a better change of back/2nd option.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.
How the fuck does this team not have one NFL QB in the wings after having an all-world recruiter/QB coach-OC as a shit HC after 5 years? Jeff getting snaps yesterday was stupid when Stanford was smart enough to know if Shaq/Jeff entered the game it was 81% likely the run was coming. -
I remember the good old days when Kim told us that Wilcox and Sark were recruiting defensive players to build a D that could stop zone read offenses but would struggle against pro-style, power offenses.RaceBannon said:Some people forget that our defense always looks good against Stanford
Hi Kim! -
I'll still take Stanford's D over every pac12 offense this season. Dominant D-line, best open-field tackling by a mile, always in position to make a play. Their offense isn't special but it doesn't need to be. Shaw being arrogant against USC doesn't change that.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.dnc said:
disagreeTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.allpurpleallgold said:
And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.MisterEm said:
Disagree.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.
The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.
HTH
Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion. -
*dominanthaie said:
I'll still take Stanford's D over every pac12 offense this season. Dominate D-line, best open-field tackling by a mile, always in position to make a play. They're offense isn't special but it doesn't need to be. Shaw being arrogant against USC doesn't change that.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.dnc said:
disagreeTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.allpurpleallgold said:
And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.MisterEm said:
Disagree.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.
The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.
HTH
Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion.
*their -
Washington got 4 carries. Coleman had 14. It's 79 to 49 for the season. Coleman has played better for the most part and has been rewarded for it. Who starts isn't as important as who gets the bulk of the carries.Disciple_2_Hole said:
Outside of the QB, on offense I was high on DWash at tb before the season but for the life of me I have no idea why he deserved to start vs Stanford. LColeman should be the first option because he runs downhill while DW and his clear fumbling issues would be a better change of back/2nd option.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.
How the fuck does this team not have one NFL QB in the wings after having an all-world recruiter/QB coach-OC as a shit HC after 5 years? Jeff getting snaps yesterday was stupid when Stanford was smart enough to know if Shaq/Jeff entered the game it was 81% likely the run was coming.
I disagree about Shaq/Jeff. The first time Jeff came in, Hall went for a 10 yard gain. The first play Shaq was in was a fake handoff that ended up being a fumble. Petersen was pissed about Lindquist closing his eyes and hucking it deep. He said it was a misread.
As for the rest of the offense, APAG had it right. It was all bad. Miles, the running game, the OL, the WR's, the play calling. It all sucked. -
Abundance.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out. -
Unless Stanford fired Shaw, they're still fucked.haie said:
I'll still take Stanford's D over every pac12 offense this season. Dominant D-line, best open-field tackling by a mile, always in position to make a play. Their offense isn't special but it doesn't need to be. Shaw being arrogant against USC doesn't change that.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.dnc said:
disagreeTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.allpurpleallgold said:
And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.MisterEm said:
Disagree.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.
The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.
HTH
Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion. -
It was hard to see if/how often the receivers were open during the game because I kept looking at Miles flailing around in the backfield and holding into the ball too long. A few passes were FS, like throwing to Coleman in traffic for 3 yards (WOW!). Offensive line has a Cozzetto hangover and a talent deficiency since 2000. I'm 27 and am tired of seeing fat fucks like Casey Bulyca and James Atoe, who never met a doughnut he didn't like.
I didn't see any of the players yelling at Miles a la Kasen, so if anybody can poast what they saw TIA.
Figure it out Peterman. -
@Swaye
May I suggest Vodka Cran.
I know it's not the usual hangover dog but bloody mary and driver have too much acid.
Try it. -
Somehow with Shaw, they've made 3 straight BCS bowls. They have a tough schedule this year, but they are a good team.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Unless Stanford fired Shaw, they're still fucked.haie said:
I'll still take Stanford's D over every pac12 offense this season. Dominant D-line, best open-field tackling by a mile, always in position to make a play. Their offense isn't special but it doesn't need to be. Shaw being arrogant against USC doesn't change that.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.dnc said:
disagreeTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.allpurpleallgold said:
And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.MisterEm said:
Disagree.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.
The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.
HTH
Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion. -
They weren't a good team last year and they're worse this year.RoadDawg55 said:
Somehow with Shaw, they've made 3 straight BCS bowls. They have a tough schedule this year, but they are a good team.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Unless Stanford fired Shaw, they're still fucked.haie said:
I'll still take Stanford's D over every pac12 offense this season. Dominant D-line, best open-field tackling by a mile, always in position to make a play. Their offense isn't special but it doesn't need to be. Shaw being arrogant against USC doesn't change that.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.dnc said:
disagreeTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.allpurpleallgold said:
And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.MisterEm said:
Disagree.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.
The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.
HTH
Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion.
Hope this helps. -
dude you are fucking legitimately retarded sometimesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Unless Stanford fired Shaw, they're still fucked.haie said:
I'll still take Stanford's D over every pac12 offense this season. Dominant D-line, best open-field tackling by a mile, always in position to make a play. Their offense isn't special but it doesn't need to be. Shaw being arrogant against USC doesn't change that.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.dnc said:
disagreeTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.allpurpleallgold said:
And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.MisterEm said:
Disagree.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.
The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.
HTH
Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion.
Shaw isn't perfect, but he's way better than you give him credit for. -
He set the 2012 national championship on fire by playing Nunes.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
dude you are fucking legitimately retarded sometimesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Unless Stanford fired Shaw, they're still fucked.haie said:
I'll still take Stanford's D over every pac12 offense this season. Dominant D-line, best open-field tackling by a mile, always in position to make a play. Their offense isn't special but it doesn't need to be. Shaw being arrogant against USC doesn't change that.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.dnc said:
disagreeTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.allpurpleallgold said:
And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.MisterEm said:
Disagree.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.
The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.
HTH
Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion.
Shaw isn't perfect, but he's way better than you give him credit for.
He backed into choking the Rose Bowl last year.
He's already lost at home to Sark this year.
HTH -
Sounds terrible. It's fucking Stanford man, they're a woman's basketball and water polo school.
-
Dude you are the type of guy that probably critiques a 10/10 for having a mole on her fucking shoulderTierbsHsotBoobs said:
He set the 2012 national championship on fire by playing Nunes.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
dude you are fucking legitimately retarded sometimesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Unless Stanford fired Shaw, they're still fucked.haie said:
I'll still take Stanford's D over every pac12 offense this season. Dominant D-line, best open-field tackling by a mile, always in position to make a play. Their offense isn't special but it doesn't need to be. Shaw being arrogant against USC doesn't change that.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.dnc said:
disagreeTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.allpurpleallgold said:
And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.MisterEm said:
Disagree.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.
The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.
HTH
Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion.
Shaw isn't perfect, but he's way better than you give him credit for.
He backed into choking the Rose Bowl last year.
He's already lost at home to Sark this year.
HTH -
The annoyer of all is really fucking annoying today.
-
Considering what Shaw inherited from Harbaugh, his run has been disappointing.
This bored has apparently never heard of Lloyd Carr and Larry Coker. -
Stanford is good, but not that good. They were good enough to expose a lot of our weaknesses, but that wasn't last year's Stanford. Definitely not Harbaugh's Stanford. So maybe that just goes to show how far we have to go. Luckily, we have a coach that can get us to improve over the course of the season. I still think we can win 10 games this year. Maybe it's the doog in me, but I haven't been impressed with many teams in the Pac-12 and I think we have a shot at a decent conference record.
Also, I think it should be said that Pete needs another offseason to really get these guys playing at (or somewhere closer to) the level that we expect them to. He knows what excellence looks like and what we need to do to get there. -
Lloyd Carr won an NC, and was probably the ceiling of the Michigan program in modernity.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Considering what Shaw inherited from Harbaugh, his run has been disappointing.
This bored has apparently never heard of Lloyd Carr and Larry Coker.
I bet Michigan fans would've LOVED to have Carr these past 7 seasons, App State game be damned. -
If Harbaugh was still coaching that Stanford team, they run us out of the fucking stadium. Simple fact.
