Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Sugar Bowl Analysis and Predictions

1356710

Comments

  • Canadawg
    Canadawg Member Posts: 5,898
    Convincing 2 score + Win
    Dawgs are about 20 points better than Bama this year. Texas beat bama by 10 so probably about a 10 point win
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,672
    edited December 2023
    Close Win
    SECDAWG said:

    On WA defense, gotta stop their big ass backs and don’t let Ewers pick the defense apart.

    Groundbreaking.

    Cmon, pod.

    Their best back is hurt, it's not like all of their RBs are Marshawn Lynch.
  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,020
    Close Win

    SECDAWG said:

    On WA defense, gotta stop their big ass backs and don’t let Ewers pick the defense apart.

    Groundbreaking.

    Cmon, pod.

    Their best back is hurt, it's not like all of their RBs are Marshawn Lynch.
    No kidding. They have a stable of backs. Blue is one. However, even more important, is how many here try and make folks coming here look like dumbfucks. You have no fucking idea how funny that is coming from my area from an outside watching in.

    It’s way better than hilarious.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,672
    Close Win
    SECDAWG said:

    SECDAWG said:

    On WA defense, gotta stop their big ass backs and don’t let Ewers pick the defense apart.

    Groundbreaking.

    Cmon, pod.

    Their best back is hurt, it's not like all of their RBs are Marshawn Lynch.
    No kidding. They have a stable of backs. Blue is one. However, even more important, is how many here try and make folks coming here look like dumbfucks. You have no fucking idea how funny that is coming from my area from an outside watching in.

    It’s way better than hilarious.
    Did they not have a stable last year?

    Your analysis of UW is always that we don't have the horses. It's pretty consistent.
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,807 Swaye's Wigwam
    Close Win
    I was teetering on convincing win. What I expect is similar to Oregon, hopefully sans the 0-21 stretch, but a 2+ score lead becoming one score at the end.

    Maybe that's still convincing.

    I wouldn't rule out 42-23 UW though. Totally in the picture.
  • EsophagealFeces
    EsophagealFeces Member Posts: 13,326
    Close Win

    I think we? Can win by two scores but that doesn't seem to be this team's m.o.

    This
  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,020
    Close Win

    I think we? Can win by two scores but that doesn't seem to be this team's m.o.

    This
    “This” won’t happen. I can guarantee “this”. WA better hope like hell they can win this game. TX is better than Oregon. By a mile.
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,551 Founders Club
    Close Win
    SECDAWG said:

    The diff will be DeBoer and Sark here.

    Also the LOS it WA can protect Penix, he ain’t faced a defense like this front line. He won’t have 3 seconds to stand back there and fuck around, pull his pud, call his gf, Jack off, take a drink…no, he better be 2 seconds and delivering the ball. No wait til fuckers run 70 yards while we Jack off and then throw. That IS NOT happening. 2 seconds pods. Or get hurt. They’re the difference in what y’all have seen.

    Flip side, DJ needs to have a helluva game running the rock.

    On WA defense, gotta stop their big ass backs and don’t let Ewers pick the defense apart.

    Hey guys, I think this is a good matchup for a close game for WA. I’m not twisting, just what I’ve seen and know.

    Penis has one of the quickest releases in all of college football.

    Look at the sacks this season.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,672
    Close Win
    SECDAWG said:

    I think we? Can win by two scores but that doesn't seem to be this team's m.o.

    This
    “This” won’t happen. I can guarantee “this”. WA better hope like hell they can win this game. TX is better than Oregon. By a mile.
    No they are not.