P12 Championship line going up
Comments
-
The two best teams championship game and championship games in a conference in general is stupid but it's a dead horse. Last year was way worse where the fucktarded system put arguably the 4th and 5th best teams in teh conference at the end of the season into the game. My big problem with the way this year shook out is Washington gets nothing for winning the conference and going undefeated and beating the #2 and #3 teams. No bye. No home field. Just a team they already beat who gets one more day of rest. And it certainly doesn't guarantee a team getting in. If god forbid Oregon wins I don't see why they get in over one loss Georgia, undefeated Florida State, one loss Texas, or one-loss Alabama, and even Ohio State, but I get Ohio State isn't getting in over a "conference champion."
Also in a lot of years where top teams lose this easily could have been a year where Washington could have even afforded to lose to Arizona and get in and Oregon could get in with one loss while not playing in the game ala Ohio State last year. -
Still bitching about having to play Oregon again.
Jesus, guys -
May as well not even play the conference schedule then.RaceBannon said:
UW did since they got hosed out of the CCGgreenblood said:
Same system in the B1G next year. Nobody said much about this when this was implemented last year.RaceBannon said:
Or don't lose the first gamegreenblood said:
Utah didn’t complain when they had to beat Oregon twice two years ago, and then USC twice last year. Quit being and bitch a grow a pair. Win and you’re in. Don’t and you can’t finish. It is what it is. This isn’t 2011 anymore.AOG said:I don't get the point of this "championship" since we? already beat the Dukx and finished first. Money? Staff, true?
Tough talk when the retarded pac 12 is your only hope
B1G isn't using division schedules
I don’t think either OR or Washington damnit! really wants Arizona right now -
There’s no chance a 1 loss PAC 12 team that doesn’t win the conference gets in ever.WoolleyDoog said:The two best teams championship game and championship games in a conference in general is stupid but it's a dead horse. Last year was way worse where the fucktarded system put arguably the 4th and 5th best teams in teh conference at the end of the season into the game. My big problem with the way this year shook out is Washington gets nothing for winning the conference and going undefeated and beating the #2 and #3 teams. No bye. No home field. Just a team they already beat who gets one more day of rest. And it certainly doesn't guarantee a team getting in. If god forbid Oregon wins I don't see why they get in over one loss Georgia, undefeated Florida State, one loss Texas, or one-loss Alabama, and even Ohio State, but I get Ohio State isn't getting in over a "conference champion."
Also in a lot of years where top teams lose this easily could have been a year where Washington could have even afforded to lose to Arizona and get in and Oregon could get in with one loss while not playing in the game ala Ohio State last year. -
You should be on your Monday-Friday kneepads and blowing George K for changing the rules and yet you're back to nothing, useless comments on here.thechatch said:Still bitching about having to play Oregon again.
Jesus, guys -
All this shit about Penix being out caused me nightmares. I dreamt Jake Fucking Browning started the game. First play was a flea flicker and Browning did his patented spin and run backwards move before panicking and trying to pitch the ball across the field. UW got lucky that a defender was nowhere near the ball and it was only a 7 yard loss.whlinder said:
3 consecutively could only happen for the conference winner since they would get a bye to the quarters, and then after the conference loser beats some G5 or loser B12 program to make the quarters, then they would play again.GreenRiverGatorz said:
The committee is going to be pretty intentional about putting conference mates in different brackets1to392831weretaken said:
Exactly. If this were next year, tOSU and Michigan are both in the playoffs. Washington and Oregon are both in. Texas and Alabama are both in. Alabama/Georgia. If Washington and Oregon somehow finish top-two in the B1G next year, it's possible they could play each other three times consecutively.whlinder said:
It’s going to be pretty hard to make a Conf champ game and not make the playoffs in the B1G/SEC.1to392831weretaken said:The odds of two teams squaring off three times in the same season is going to be decently high. It's pretty stupid.
All 3 games in different places too.
It’s going to be so weird. I wonder if the feel of a big game, that feeling that takes over campus for a few days leading up to a big time OOC matchup or conference game, will be lost forever in this format.
Anyway surprised the line hasn’t reached -19 with Penix out -
Equitable? What’s more equitable than the two best teams playing for the conference title?haie said:
If the B1G would have done away with divisions, but still had all the B1G East teams play each other (and limp dick B1G West teams play each other) they would have been up in arms.greenblood said:
They aren’t using divisions period. That’s the point. They got sick of either Michigan or Ohio St getting left off the conference title game for Iowa, Purdue, and Wisconsin.RaceBannon said:
UW did since they got hosed out of the CCGgreenblood said:
Same system in the B1G next year. Nobody said much about this when this was implemented last year.RaceBannon said:
Or don't lose the first gamegreenblood said:
Utah didn’t complain when they had to beat Oregon twice two years ago, and then USC twice last year. Quit being and bitch a grow a pair. Win and you’re in. Don’t and you can’t finish. It is what it is. This isn’t 2011 anymore.AOG said:I don't get the point of this "championship" since we? already beat the Dukx and finished first. Money? Staff, true?
Tough talk when the retarded pac 12 is your only hope
B1G isn't using division schedules
What the Pac 12 did was a desperation play for TV money, it wasn't about an equitable system.
We know the divisions was an equitable system, because if you play the hard schedule (P12 North) they're simply elimination games.
Which Washington eliminated Oregon both years, went undefeated in the harder division, and deserved to get USC and Arizona. -
AIDS
-
@haie is rightgreenblood said:
Equitable? What’s more equitable than the two best teams playing for the conference title?haie said:
If the B1G would have done away with divisions, but still had all the B1G East teams play each other (and limp dick B1G West teams play each other) they would have been up in arms.greenblood said:
They aren’t using divisions period. That’s the point. They got sick of either Michigan or Ohio St getting left off the conference title game for Iowa, Purdue, and Wisconsin.RaceBannon said:
UW did since they got hosed out of the CCGgreenblood said:
Same system in the B1G next year. Nobody said much about this when this was implemented last year.RaceBannon said:
Or don't lose the first gamegreenblood said:
Utah didn’t complain when they had to beat Oregon twice two years ago, and then USC twice last year. Quit being and bitch a grow a pair. Win and you’re in. Don’t and you can’t finish. It is what it is. This isn’t 2011 anymore.AOG said:I don't get the point of this "championship" since we? already beat the Dukx and finished first. Money? Staff, true?
Tough talk when the retarded pac 12 is your only hope
B1G isn't using division schedules
What the Pac 12 did was a desperation play for TV money, it wasn't about an equitable system.
We know the divisions was an equitable system, because if you play the hard schedule (P12 North) they're simply elimination games.
Which Washington eliminated Oregon both years, went undefeated in the harder division, and deserved to get USC and Arizona.
Oregon had their shot
No worries. This one is ITB for Washington
