Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

P12 Championship line going up

13

Comments

  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,925 Founders Club
    edited November 2023
    bisonduck said:

    greenblood said:

    RaceBannon said:

    greenblood said:

    AOG said:

    I don't get the point of this "championship" since we? already beat the Dukx and finished first. Money? Staff, true?

    Utah didn’t complain when they had to beat Oregon twice two years ago, and then USC twice last year. Quit being and bitch a grow a pair. Win and you’re in. Don’t and you can’t finish. It is what it is. This isn’t 2011 anymore.
    Or don't lose the first game

    Tough talk when the retarded pac 12 is your only hope
    Same system in the B1G next year. Nobody said much about this when this was implemented last year.
    This game all but ensures a CFP participant. It's good for the conference and not UW this year. Imagine playing Arizona, they win, and no PAC 12 teams goes to the playoff.

    Grow a pair.
    You aren't getting it.

    "ensuring a CFP participant" for a dying conference. Jesus Christ you are 70+ years old guaranteed.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bisonduck
    bisonduck Member Posts: 715
    Also, getting back to the OP, the line hit -10 somewhere. I haven't vetted the info and will not but BIG if true.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • flatus
    flatus Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,472 Swaye's Wigwam
    1to392831weretaken said:

    whlinder said:

    1to392831weretaken said:

    The odds of two teams squaring off three times in the same season is going to be decently high. It's pretty stupid.

    It’s going to be pretty hard to make a Conf champ game and not make the playoffs in the B1G/SEC.
    Exactly. If this were next year, tOSU and Michigan are both in the playoffs. Washington and Oregon are both in. Texas and Alabama are both in. Alabama/Georgia. If Washington and Oregon somehow finish top-two in the B1G next year, it's possible they could play each other three times consecutively.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bisonduck
    bisonduck Member Posts: 715
    haie said:

    bisonduck said:

    greenblood said:

    RaceBannon said:

    greenblood said:

    AOG said:

    I don't get the point of this "championship" since we? already beat the Dukx and finished first. Money? Staff, true?

    Utah didn’t complain when they had to beat Oregon twice two years ago, and then USC twice last year. Quit being and bitch a grow a pair. Win and you’re in. Don’t and you can’t finish. It is what it is. This isn’t 2011 anymore.
    Or don't lose the first game

    Tough talk when the retarded pac 12 is your only hope
    Same system in the B1G next year. Nobody said much about this when this was implemented last year.
    This game all but ensures a CFP participant. It's good for the conference and not UW this year. Imagine playing Arizona, they win, and no PAC 12 teams goes to the playoff.

    Grow a pair.
    You aren't getting it.

    "ensuring a CFP participant" for a dying conference. Jesus Christ you are 70+ years old guaranteed.
    They made the change while it was intact.

    You are fucking weird. That is the only thing that is guaranteed.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DawgOfTheAges
    DawgOfTheAges Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,756 Founders Club
    haie said:

    bisonduck said:

    greenblood said:

    RaceBannon said:

    greenblood said:

    AOG said:

    I don't get the point of this "championship" since we? already beat the Dukx and finished first. Money? Staff, true?

    Utah didn’t complain when they had to beat Oregon twice two years ago, and then USC twice last year. Quit being and bitch a grow a pair. Win and you’re in. Don’t and you can’t finish. It is what it is. This isn’t 2011 anymore.
    Or don't lose the first game

    Tough talk when the retarded pac 12 is your only hope
    Same system in the B1G next year. Nobody said much about this when this was implemented last year.
    This game all but ensures a CFP participant. It's good for the conference and not UW this year. Imagine playing Arizona, they win, and no PAC 12 teams goes to the playoff.

    Grow a pair.
    You aren't getting it.

    "ensuring a CFP participant" for a dying conference. Jesus Christ you are 70+ years old guaranteed.
    I’m interested to hear more about this 70+ years old as an insult [presumably] part… care to elaborate? I’m all ears [hearing aids]…
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,316 Founders Club
    bisonduck said:

    greenblood said:

    RaceBannon said:

    greenblood said:

    AOG said:

    I don't get the point of this "championship" since we? already beat the Dukx and finished first. Money? Staff, true?

    Utah didn’t complain when they had to beat Oregon twice two years ago, and then USC twice last year. Quit being and bitch a grow a pair. Win and you’re in. Don’t and you can’t finish. It is what it is. This isn’t 2011 anymore.
    Or don't lose the first game

    Tough talk when the retarded pac 12 is your only hope
    Same system in the B1G next year. Nobody said much about this when this was implemented last year.
    This game all but ensures a CFP participant. It's good for the conference and not UW this year. Imagine playing Arizona, they win, and no PAC 12 teams goes to the playoff.

    Grow a pair.
    So you need a second chance because you suck

    Got it
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bisonduck
    bisonduck Member Posts: 715
    RaceBannon said:

    bisonduck said:

    greenblood said:

    RaceBannon said:

    greenblood said:

    AOG said:

    I don't get the point of this "championship" since we? already beat the Dukx and finished first. Money? Staff, true?

    Utah didn’t complain when they had to beat Oregon twice two years ago, and then USC twice last year. Quit being and bitch a grow a pair. Win and you’re in. Don’t and you can’t finish. It is what it is. This isn’t 2011 anymore.
    Or don't lose the first game

    Tough talk when the retarded pac 12 is your only hope
    Same system in the B1G next year. Nobody said much about this when this was implemented last year.
    This game all but ensures a CFP participant. It's good for the conference and not UW this year. Imagine playing Arizona, they win, and no PAC 12 teams goes to the playoff.

    Grow a pair.
    So you need a second chance because you suck

    Got it
    Basically
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,925 Founders Club
    TheRoarOfTheCrowd said:

    haie said:

    bisonduck said:

    greenblood said:

    RaceBannon said:

    greenblood said:

    AOG said:

    I don't get the point of this "championship" since we? already beat the Dukx and finished first. Money? Staff, true?

    Utah didn’t complain when they had to beat Oregon twice two years ago, and then USC twice last year. Quit being and bitch a grow a pair. Win and you’re in. Don’t and you can’t finish. It is what it is. This isn’t 2011 anymore.
    Or don't lose the first game

    Tough talk when the retarded pac 12 is your only hope
    Same system in the B1G next year. Nobody said much about this when this was implemented last year.
    This game all but ensures a CFP participant. It's good for the conference and not UW this year. Imagine playing Arizona, they win, and no PAC 12 teams goes to the playoff.

    Grow a pair.
    You aren't getting it.

    "ensuring a CFP participant" for a dying conference. Jesus Christ you are 70+ years old guaranteed.
    I’m interested to hear more about this 70+ years old as an insult [presumably] part… care to elaborate? I’m all ears [hearing aids]…
    Just like there is dumb fuck 20+ year old and 30+ year olds,

    there are the 70+ year old duck fans that are either gaped out from 40+ years of WASHINGTON or they didn't care for 40+ years in some Oregon backwater until ~2006.

    Worse bandwagon fans than kids like Preston or 503FuckTooth imo.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bisonduck
    bisonduck Member Posts: 715
    edited December 2023
    haie said:

    TheRoarOfTheCrowd said:

    haie said:

    bisonduck said:

    greenblood said:

    RaceBannon said:

    greenblood said:

    AOG said:

    I don't get the point of this "championship" since we? already beat the Dukx and finished first. Money? Staff, true?

    Utah didn’t complain when they had to beat Oregon twice two years ago, and then USC twice last year. Quit being and bitch a grow a pair. Win and you’re in. Don’t and you can’t finish. It is what it is. This isn’t 2011 anymore.
    Or don't lose the first game

    Tough talk when the retarded pac 12 is your only hope
    Same system in the B1G next year. Nobody said much about this when this was implemented last year.
    This game all but ensures a CFP participant. It's good for the conference and not UW this year. Imagine playing Arizona, they win, and no PAC 12 teams goes to the playoff.

    Grow a pair.
    You aren't getting it.

    "ensuring a CFP participant" for a dying conference. Jesus Christ you are 70+ years old guaranteed.
    I’m interested to hear more about this 70+ years old as an insult [presumably] part… care to elaborate? I’m all ears [hearing aids]…
    Just like there is dumb fuck 20+ year old and 30+ year olds,

    there are the 70+ year old duck fans that are either gaped out from 40+ years of WASHINGTON or they didn't care for 40+ years in some Oregon backwater until ~2006.

    Worse bandwagon fans than kids like Preston or 503FuckTooth imo.
    I am 45 and started following the Ducks in middle school, I am not either.

    Fact is the rule to put the two top teams in the CCG was a good conference move, if you're trying to make yourself more marketable. Sorry it made your path more difficult.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,925 Founders Club
    bisonduck said:

    haie said:

    TheRoarOfTheCrowd said:

    haie said:

    bisonduck said:

    greenblood said:

    RaceBannon said:

    greenblood said:

    AOG said:

    I don't get the point of this "championship" since we? already beat the Dukx and finished first. Money? Staff, true?

    Utah didn’t complain when they had to beat Oregon twice two years ago, and then USC twice last year. Quit being and bitch a grow a pair. Win and you’re in. Don’t and you can’t finish. It is what it is. This isn’t 2011 anymore.
    Or don't lose the first game

    Tough talk when the retarded pac 12 is your only hope
    Same system in the B1G next year. Nobody said much about this when this was implemented last year.
    This game all but ensures a CFP participant. It's good for the conference and not UW this year. Imagine playing Arizona, they win, and no PAC 12 teams goes to the playoff.

    Grow a pair.
    You aren't getting it.

    "ensuring a CFP participant" for a dying conference. Jesus Christ you are 70+ years old guaranteed.
    I’m interested to hear more about this 70+ years old as an insult [presumably] part… care to elaborate? I’m all ears [hearing aids]…
    Just like there is dumb fuck 20+ year old and 30+ year olds,

    there are the 70+ year old duck fans that are either gaped out from 40+ years of WASHINGTON or they didn't care for 40+ years in some Oregon backwater until ~2006.

    Worse bandwagon fans than kids like Preston or 503FuckTooth imo.
    I am 45 and started following the Ducks in middle school, I am not either.

    Fact is the rule to put the two top teams in the CCG was a good conference move, if your trying to make yourself more marketable. Sorry it made you path more difficult.
    I'll go ahead and pin you into the 'backwater guy who only cared when a random team in his area got a pro sports owner' category.

    Fuck off.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bisonduck
    bisonduck Member Posts: 715
    haie said:

    bisonduck said:

    haie said:

    TheRoarOfTheCrowd said:

    haie said:

    bisonduck said:

    greenblood said:

    RaceBannon said:

    greenblood said:

    AOG said:

    I don't get the point of this "championship" since we? already beat the Dukx and finished first. Money? Staff, true?

    Utah didn’t complain when they had to beat Oregon twice two years ago, and then USC twice last year. Quit being and bitch a grow a pair. Win and you’re in. Don’t and you can’t finish. It is what it is. This isn’t 2011 anymore.
    Or don't lose the first game

    Tough talk when the retarded pac 12 is your only hope
    Same system in the B1G next year. Nobody said much about this when this was implemented last year.
    This game all but ensures a CFP participant. It's good for the conference and not UW this year. Imagine playing Arizona, they win, and no PAC 12 teams goes to the playoff.

    Grow a pair.
    You aren't getting it.

    "ensuring a CFP participant" for a dying conference. Jesus Christ you are 70+ years old guaranteed.
    I’m interested to hear more about this 70+ years old as an insult [presumably] part… care to elaborate? I’m all ears [hearing aids]…
    Just like there is dumb fuck 20+ year old and 30+ year olds,

    there are the 70+ year old duck fans that are either gaped out from 40+ years of WASHINGTON or they didn't care for 40+ years in some Oregon backwater until ~2006.

    Worse bandwagon fans than kids like Preston or 503FuckTooth imo.
    I am 45 and started following the Ducks in middle school, I am not either.

    Fact is the rule to put the two top teams in the CCG was a good conference move, if your trying to make yourself more marketable. Sorry it made you path more difficult.
    I'll go ahead and pin you into the 'backwater guy who only cared when a random team in his area got a pro sports owner' category.

    Fuck off.
    Weird
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bisonduck
    bisonduck Member Posts: 715
    edited December 2023
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

    bisonduck said:

    haie said:

    TheRoarOfTheCrowd said:

    haie said:

    bisonduck said:

    greenblood said:

    RaceBannon said:

    greenblood said:

    AOG said:

    I don't get the point of this "championship" since we? already beat the Dukx and finished first. Money? Staff, true?

    Utah didn’t complain when they had to beat Oregon twice two years ago, and then USC twice last year. Quit being and bitch a grow a pair. Win and you’re in. Don’t and you can’t finish. It is what it is. This isn’t 2011 anymore.
    Or don't lose the first game

    Tough talk when the retarded pac 12 is your only hope
    Same system in the B1G next year. Nobody said much about this when this was implemented last year.
    This game all but ensures a CFP participant. It's good for the conference and not UW this year. Imagine playing Arizona, they win, and no PAC 12 teams goes to the playoff.

    Grow a pair.
    You aren't getting it.

    "ensuring a CFP participant" for a dying conference. Jesus Christ you are 70+ years old guaranteed.
    I’m interested to hear more about this 70+ years old as an insult [presumably] part… care to elaborate? I’m all ears [hearing aids]…
    Just like there is dumb fuck 20+ year old and 30+ year olds,

    there are the 70+ year old duck fans that are either gaped out from 40+ years of WASHINGTON or they didn't care for 40+ years in some Oregon backwater until ~2006.

    Worse bandwagon fans than kids like Preston or 503FuckTooth imo.
    I am 45 and started following the Ducks in middle school, I am not either.

    Fact is the rule to put the two top teams in the CCG was a good conference move, if you're trying to make yourself more marketable. Sorry it made your path more difficult.
    45, huh?

    Yeah, you’re definitely a fucking retard.
    I don't need anger management though.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,166
    1to392831weretaken said:

    whlinder said:

    1to392831weretaken said:

    The odds of two teams squaring off three times in the same season is going to be decently high. It's pretty stupid.

    It’s going to be pretty hard to make a Conf champ game and not make the playoffs in the B1G/SEC.
    Exactly. If this were next year, tOSU and Michigan are both in the playoffs. Washington and Oregon are both in. Texas and Alabama are both in. Alabama/Georgia. If Washington and Oregon somehow finish top-two in the B1G next year, it's possible they could play each other three times consecutively.
    The committee is going to be pretty intentional about putting conference mates in different brackets
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireTheJanitor
    FireTheJanitor Member Posts: 1,483
    bisonduck said:

    CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

    bisonduck said:

    haie said:

    TheRoarOfTheCrowd said:

    haie said:

    bisonduck said:

    greenblood said:

    RaceBannon said:

    greenblood said:

    AOG said:

    I don't get the point of this "championship" since we? already beat the Dukx and finished first. Money? Staff, true?

    Utah didn’t complain when they had to beat Oregon twice two years ago, and then USC twice last year. Quit being and bitch a grow a pair. Win and you’re in. Don’t and you can’t finish. It is what it is. This isn’t 2011 anymore.
    Or don't lose the first game

    Tough talk when the retarded pac 12 is your only hope
    Same system in the B1G next year. Nobody said much about this when this was implemented last year.
    This game all but ensures a CFP participant. It's good for the conference and not UW this year. Imagine playing Arizona, they win, and no PAC 12 teams goes to the playoff.

    Grow a pair.
    You aren't getting it.

    "ensuring a CFP participant" for a dying conference. Jesus Christ you are 70+ years old guaranteed.
    I’m interested to hear more about this 70+ years old as an insult [presumably] part… care to elaborate? I’m all ears [hearing aids]…
    Just like there is dumb fuck 20+ year old and 30+ year olds,

    there are the 70+ year old duck fans that are either gaped out from 40+ years of WASHINGTON or they didn't care for 40+ years in some Oregon backwater until ~2006.

    Worse bandwagon fans than kids like Preston or 503FuckTooth imo.
    I am 45 and started following the Ducks in middle school, I am not either.

    Fact is the rule to put the two top teams in the CCG was a good conference move, if you're trying to make yourself more marketable. Sorry it made your path more difficult.
    45, huh?

    Yeah, you’re definitely a fucking retard.
    I don't need anger management though.
    Short angry and retarded would have been an unfair hand to be dealt. Glad you only have 2/3
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bisonduck
    bisonduck Member Posts: 715
    FireTheJanitor said:

    bisonduck said:

    CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

    bisonduck said:

    haie said:

    TheRoarOfTheCrowd said:

    haie said:

    bisonduck said:

    greenblood said:

    RaceBannon said:

    greenblood said:

    AOG said:

    I don't get the point of this "championship" since we? already beat the Dukx and finished first. Money? Staff, true?

    Utah didn’t complain when they had to beat Oregon twice two years ago, and then USC twice last year. Quit being and bitch a grow a pair. Win and you’re in. Don’t and you can’t finish. It is what it is. This isn’t 2011 anymore.
    Or don't lose the first game

    Tough talk when the retarded pac 12 is your only hope
    Same system in the B1G next year. Nobody said much about this when this was implemented last year.
    This game all but ensures a CFP participant. It's good for the conference and not UW this year. Imagine playing Arizona, they win, and no PAC 12 teams goes to the playoff.

    Grow a pair.
    You aren't getting it.

    "ensuring a CFP participant" for a dying conference. Jesus Christ you are 70+ years old guaranteed.
    I’m interested to hear more about this 70+ years old as an insult [presumably] part… care to elaborate? I’m all ears [hearing aids]…
    Just like there is dumb fuck 20+ year old and 30+ year olds,

    there are the 70+ year old duck fans that are either gaped out from 40+ years of WASHINGTON or they didn't care for 40+ years in some Oregon backwater until ~2006.

    Worse bandwagon fans than kids like Preston or 503FuckTooth imo.
    I am 45 and started following the Ducks in middle school, I am not either.

    Fact is the rule to put the two top teams in the CCG was a good conference move, if you're trying to make yourself more marketable. Sorry it made your path more difficult.
    45, huh?

    Yeah, you’re definitely a fucking retard.
    I don't need anger management though.
    Short angry and retarded would have been an unfair hand to be dealt. Glad you only have 2/3
    That was clever. Let it out.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DucksFC
    DucksFC Member Posts: 4,237
    edited December 2023
    line hit 10 per BetMGM. Penix confirmed out. D-Mo about to have his redemption moment. DOOMED
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,360 Founders Club
    bisonduck said:

    CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

    bisonduck said:

    haie said:

    TheRoarOfTheCrowd said:

    haie said:

    bisonduck said:

    greenblood said:

    RaceBannon said:

    greenblood said:

    AOG said:

    I don't get the point of this "championship" since we? already beat the Dukx and finished first. Money? Staff, true?

    Utah didn’t complain when they had to beat Oregon twice two years ago, and then USC twice last year. Quit being and bitch a grow a pair. Win and you’re in. Don’t and you can’t finish. It is what it is. This isn’t 2011 anymore.
    Or don't lose the first game

    Tough talk when the retarded pac 12 is your only hope
    Same system in the B1G next year. Nobody said much about this when this was implemented last year.
    This game all but ensures a CFP participant. It's good for the conference and not UW this year. Imagine playing Arizona, they win, and no PAC 12 teams goes to the playoff.

    Grow a pair.
    You aren't getting it.

    "ensuring a CFP participant" for a dying conference. Jesus Christ you are 70+ years old guaranteed.
    I’m interested to hear more about this 70+ years old as an insult [presumably] part… care to elaborate? I’m all ears [hearing aids]…
    Just like there is dumb fuck 20+ year old and 30+ year olds,

    there are the 70+ year old duck fans that are either gaped out from 40+ years of WASHINGTON or they didn't care for 40+ years in some Oregon backwater until ~2006.

    Worse bandwagon fans than kids like Preston or 503FuckTooth imo.
    I am 45 and started following the Ducks in middle school, I am not either.

    Fact is the rule to put the two top teams in the CCG was a good conference move, if you're trying to make yourself more marketable. Sorry it made your path more difficult.
    45, huh?

    Yeah, you’re definitely a fucking retard.
    I don't need anger management though.
    Neither do I. As many who have met me know I know need weight management help.

    45 and acting like a young Fudgie on an opposing teams message board. Wow. Just wow.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bisonduck
    bisonduck Member Posts: 715
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

    bisonduck said:

    CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

    bisonduck said:

    haie said:

    TheRoarOfTheCrowd said:

    haie said:

    bisonduck said:

    greenblood said:

    RaceBannon said:

    greenblood said:

    AOG said:

    I don't get the point of this "championship" since we? already beat the Dukx and finished first. Money? Staff, true?

    Utah didn’t complain when they had to beat Oregon twice two years ago, and then USC twice last year. Quit being and bitch a grow a pair. Win and you’re in. Don’t and you can’t finish. It is what it is. This isn’t 2011 anymore.
    Or don't lose the first game

    Tough talk when the retarded pac 12 is your only hope
    Same system in the B1G next year. Nobody said much about this when this was implemented last year.
    This game all but ensures a CFP participant. It's good for the conference and not UW this year. Imagine playing Arizona, they win, and no PAC 12 teams goes to the playoff.

    Grow a pair.
    You aren't getting it.

    "ensuring a CFP participant" for a dying conference. Jesus Christ you are 70+ years old guaranteed.
    I’m interested to hear more about this 70+ years old as an insult [presumably] part… care to elaborate? I’m all ears [hearing aids]…
    Just like there is dumb fuck 20+ year old and 30+ year olds,

    there are the 70+ year old duck fans that are either gaped out from 40+ years of WASHINGTON or they didn't care for 40+ years in some Oregon backwater until ~2006.

    Worse bandwagon fans than kids like Preston or 503FuckTooth imo.
    I am 45 and started following the Ducks in middle school, I am not either.

    Fact is the rule to put the two top teams in the CCG was a good conference move, if you're trying to make yourself more marketable. Sorry it made your path more difficult.
    45, huh?

    Yeah, you’re definitely a fucking retard.
    I don't need anger management though.
    Neither do I. As many who have met me know I know need weight management help.

    45 and acting like a young Fudgie on an opposing teams message board. Wow. Just wow.
    You are getting something out of this. You should thank me for all the entertainment I provide.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whlinder
    whlinder Member Posts: 5,283
    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    1to392831weretaken said:

    whlinder said:

    1to392831weretaken said:

    The odds of two teams squaring off three times in the same season is going to be decently high. It's pretty stupid.

    It’s going to be pretty hard to make a Conf champ game and not make the playoffs in the B1G/SEC.
    Exactly. If this were next year, tOSU and Michigan are both in the playoffs. Washington and Oregon are both in. Texas and Alabama are both in. Alabama/Georgia. If Washington and Oregon somehow finish top-two in the B1G next year, it's possible they could play each other three times consecutively.
    The committee is going to be pretty intentional about putting conference mates in different brackets
    3 consecutively could only happen for the conference winner since they would get a bye to the quarters, and then after the conference loser beats some G5 or loser B12 program to make the quarters, then they would play again.

    All 3 games in different places too.

    It’s going to be so weird. I wonder if the feel of a big game, that feeling that takes over campus for a few days leading up to a big time OOC matchup or conference game, will be lost forever in this format.

    Anyway surprised the line hasn’t reached -19 with Penix out
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WoolleyDoog
    WoolleyDoog Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,295 Founders Club
    The two best teams championship game and championship games in a conference in general is stupid but it's a dead horse. Last year was way worse where the fucktarded system put arguably the 4th and 5th best teams in teh conference at the end of the season into the game. My big problem with the way this year shook out is Washington gets nothing for winning the conference and going undefeated and beating the #2 and #3 teams. No bye. No home field. Just a team they already beat who gets one more day of rest. And it certainly doesn't guarantee a team getting in. If god forbid Oregon wins I don't see why they get in over one loss Georgia, undefeated Florida State, one loss Texas, or one-loss Alabama, and even Ohio State, but I get Ohio State isn't getting in over a "conference champion."

    Also in a lot of years where top teams lose this easily could have been a year where Washington could have even afforded to lose to Arizona and get in and Oregon could get in with one loss while not playing in the game ala Ohio State last year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • thechatch
    thechatch Member Posts: 7,312 Standard Supporter
    Still bitching about having to play Oregon again.

    Jesus, guys
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    edited December 2023
    RaceBannon said:

    greenblood said:

    RaceBannon said:

    greenblood said:

    AOG said:

    I don't get the point of this "championship" since we? already beat the Dukx and finished first. Money? Staff, true?

    Utah didn’t complain when they had to beat Oregon twice two years ago, and then USC twice last year. Quit being and bitch a grow a pair. Win and you’re in. Don’t and you can’t finish. It is what it is. This isn’t 2011 anymore.
    Or don't lose the first game

    Tough talk when the retarded pac 12 is your only hope
    Same system in the B1G next year. Nobody said much about this when this was implemented last year.
    UW did since they got hosed out of the CCG

    B1G isn't using division schedules
    May as well not even play the conference schedule then.

    I don’t think either OR or Washington damnit! really wants Arizona right now
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bisonduck
    bisonduck Member Posts: 715
    edited December 2023
    WoolleyDoog said:

    The two best teams championship game and championship games in a conference in general is stupid but it's a dead horse. Last year was way worse where the fucktarded system put arguably the 4th and 5th best teams in teh conference at the end of the season into the game. My big problem with the way this year shook out is Washington gets nothing for winning the conference and going undefeated and beating the #2 and #3 teams. No bye. No home field. Just a team they already beat who gets one more day of rest. And it certainly doesn't guarantee a team getting in. If god forbid Oregon wins I don't see why they get in over one loss Georgia, undefeated Florida State, one loss Texas, or one-loss Alabama, and even Ohio State, but I get Ohio State isn't getting in over a "conference champion."

    Also in a lot of years where top teams lose this easily could have been a year where Washington could have even afforded to lose to Arizona and get in and Oregon could get in with one loss while not playing in the game ala Ohio State last year.

    There’s no chance a 1 loss PAC 12 team that doesn’t win the conference gets in ever.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,925 Founders Club
    edited December 2023
    thechatch said:

    Still bitching about having to play Oregon again.

    Jesus, guys

    You should be on your Monday-Friday kneepads and blowing George K for changing the rules and yet you're back to nothing, useless comments on here.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    haie said:

    thechatch said:

    Still bitching about having to play Oregon again.

    Jesus, guys

    You should be on your Monday-Friday kneepads and blowing George K for changing the rules and yet you're back to nothing, useless comments on here.
    Overserved IPA @haie is the best @haie
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,360 Founders Club
    whlinder said:

    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    1to392831weretaken said:

    whlinder said:

    1to392831weretaken said:

    The odds of two teams squaring off three times in the same season is going to be decently high. It's pretty stupid.

    It’s going to be pretty hard to make a Conf champ game and not make the playoffs in the B1G/SEC.
    Exactly. If this were next year, tOSU and Michigan are both in the playoffs. Washington and Oregon are both in. Texas and Alabama are both in. Alabama/Georgia. If Washington and Oregon somehow finish top-two in the B1G next year, it's possible they could play each other three times consecutively.
    The committee is going to be pretty intentional about putting conference mates in different brackets
    3 consecutively could only happen for the conference winner since they would get a bye to the quarters, and then after the conference loser beats some G5 or loser B12 program to make the quarters, then they would play again.

    All 3 games in different places too.

    It’s going to be so weird. I wonder if the feel of a big game, that feeling that takes over campus for a few days leading up to a big time OOC matchup or conference game, will be lost forever in this format.

    Anyway surprised the line hasn’t reached -19 with Penix out
    All this shit about Penix being out caused me nightmares. I dreamt Jake Fucking Browning started the game. First play was a flea flicker and Browning did his patented spin and run backwards move before panicking and trying to pitch the ball across the field. UW got lucky that a defender was nowhere near the ball and it was only a 7 yard loss.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,560
    haie said:

    greenblood said:

    RaceBannon said:

    greenblood said:

    RaceBannon said:

    greenblood said:

    AOG said:

    I don't get the point of this "championship" since we? already beat the Dukx and finished first. Money? Staff, true?

    Utah didn’t complain when they had to beat Oregon twice two years ago, and then USC twice last year. Quit being and bitch a grow a pair. Win and you’re in. Don’t and you can’t finish. It is what it is. This isn’t 2011 anymore.
    Or don't lose the first game

    Tough talk when the retarded pac 12 is your only hope
    Same system in the B1G next year. Nobody said much about this when this was implemented last year.
    UW did since they got hosed out of the CCG

    B1G isn't using division schedules
    They aren’t using divisions period. That’s the point. They got sick of either Michigan or Ohio St getting left off the conference title game for Iowa, Purdue, and Wisconsin.
    If the B1G would have done away with divisions, but still had all the B1G East teams play each other (and limp dick B1G West teams play each other) they would have been up in arms.

    What the Pac 12 did was a desperation play for TV money, it wasn't about an equitable system.

    We know the divisions was an equitable system, because if you play the hard schedule (P12 North) they're simply elimination games.

    Which Washington eliminated Oregon both years, went undefeated in the harder division, and deserved to get USC and Arizona.
    Equitable? What’s more equitable than the two best teams playing for the conference title?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dirtysouwfdawg
    dirtysouwfdawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,199 Swaye's Wigwam
    AIDS
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter