One more question:

What’s wrong here in this era of CFB compared to olds voting? And how does it compare now that y’all have a legitimate team that may can PROVE, without all doubt…is it better? More fun? More entertaining? Or just as much FS as many has said because we hate the gridiron?
Comments
-
Let’s let em vote. Old school.
Hell, tOSU against Bama. ..winner? NC bar none. Voted in.
“What? Wait a gatdamn minute, we are Washington and undefeated!! By Gawld.!!!
“Yeah? FU, we vote and you ain’t shit. Hi Auburn!” 👋
That’s how you olds still want this to work? Or you wanna know whose THE best? In CFB?
We can either keep the pageantry, or KNOW. I can tell y’all now, if you wanna keep the olds and “pagentry”, WA has NO shot this year. They would play in the Alamo Bowl. And GA and MI wouid go at the NC.
BUT, this ain’t the olds. We have, ,,,,….guess it,,,,..a fuckn playoff. Guess what WA gets to do if they beat the Ducks?
Yeah. Prove it ON the gridiron. That’s the worst word to the olds, GRIDIRON. It’s scary. It absolutely means, “prove it Motherfuckers” and nothing to do with “vote me”.. -
That looks like more than one question to me. Fuck me that's indecipherable.
-
Your fucking asshole. Read agian.bisonduck said:That looks like more than one question to me. Fuck me that's indecipherable.
-
I have broke that shit down about as simple as I can to these west coast figs that still want a sports writing panel and coaches poll and soccer moms voting in the best two teams on the nation to play for a prestigious College Football National Championship.SECDAWG said:
Your fucking asshole. Read agian.bisonduck said:That looks like more than one question to me. Fuck me that's indecipherable.
-
Typically @SECDAWG type thread. Him responding to his own posts
-
I didn't read any of the first two posts.
-
This ain't the NFL, pod.
We don't need no stinking play off and super bowl. -
OK. Who right now would, in your glasses, play for the NC game to be crowned NC after they play??YellowSnow said:This ain't the NFL, pod.
We don't need no stinking play off and super bowl.
I’d bet my picks are different. But I know what May settle it.
Serial. Who’s your #1 and # 2 right now? And of course, the winner is crowned. -
DWAGS and DWGASSECDAWG said:
OK. Who right now would, in your glasses, play for the NC game to be crowned NC after they play??YellowSnow said:This ain't the NFL, pod.
We don't need no stinking play off and super bowl.
I’d bet my picks are different. But I know what May settle it.
Serial. Who’s your #1 and # 2 right now? And of course, the winner is crowned. -
DWGAS and Wolverines.UWerentThereMan said:
DWAGS and DWGASSECDAWG said:
OK. Who right now would, in your glasses, play for the NC game to be crowned NC after they play??YellowSnow said:This ain't the NFL, pod.
We don't need no stinking play off and super bowl.
I’d bet my picks are different. But I know what May settle it.
Serial. Who’s your #1 and # 2 right now? And of course, the winner is crowned. -
Wolverines played 1 tough team they already beat, but you're probably right they make it this time.SECDAWG said:
DWGAS and Wolverines.UWerentThereMan said:
DWAGS and DWGASSECDAWG said:
OK. Who right now would, in your glasses, play for the NC game to be crowned NC after they play??YellowSnow said:This ain't the NFL, pod.
We don't need no stinking play off and super bowl.
I’d bet my picks are different. But I know what May settle it.
Serial. Who’s your #1 and # 2 right now? And of course, the winner is crowned. -
Well i do like the idea of a playoff, but think it should be a top 8 affair and get rid of the conference championships because as the argument goes, most would be able to agree on the top 8
-
Drunk SECDAWG is best SECDAWG
-
I can't understand him drunk or soberEsophagealFeces said:Drunk SECDAWG is best SECDAWG
-
Oh hell yeah you can. You just see my handle starting with “SEC” and you check out…Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
I can't understand him drunk or soberEsophagealFeces said:Drunk SECDAWG is best SECDAWG
-
That’s the point of the thread. What YOU see ain’t what I see. I say GA Dawgs and Wolverines.UWerentThereMan said:
Wolverines played 1 tough team they already beat, but you're probably right they make it this time.SECDAWG said:
DWGAS and Wolverines.UWerentThereMan said:
DWAGS and DWGASSECDAWG said:
OK. Who right now would, in your glasses, play for the NC game to be crowned NC after they play??YellowSnow said:This ain't the NFL, pod.
We don't need no stinking play off and super bowl.
I’d bet my picks are different. But I know what May settle it.
Serial. Who’s your #1 and # 2 right now? And of course, the winner is crowned.
There are many that would agree. However, there are many(esp on the WEST coast) that would absolutely say fuck that shit…
I KNOW how we can settle this… -
I appreciate yer support, pod.EsophagealFeces said:Drunk SECDAWG is best SECDAWG
-
Yeah, since we can’t roll back the clock to the old system this is the most realistic way to salvage things.TheRoarOfTheCrowd said:Well i do like the idea of a playoff, but think it should be a top 8 affair and get rid of the conference championships because as the argument goes, most would be able to agree on the top 8
But for me the issue now isn’t so much the playoffs, it’s everything before that. I know all of you liked to tease @Sandra6 about Rutgers/Maryland, but she/he/they were right. Those two, and several other teams, don’t belong in the B1G for football.
The best way to breathe life into the CFB is taking a page from @PurpleJ’s soccer playbook and do relegation - “Just win baby” on steroids. (I wish we could do promotion too, but that’s not feasible.) It’s either this, or it will be decided in the next round of realignment. Either way, there’s going to be a culling of the herd.
But like @YellowSnow, I now desperately miss the old bowl system. Sometimes you don’t know what you’ve got ‘til it’s gone. -
I also think “8 is enough”….SWIDT??TheRoarOfTheCrowd said:Well i do like the idea of a playoff, but think it should be a top 8 affair and get rid of the conference championships because as the argument goes, most would be able to agree on the top 8
No way 9-12 is beating #1 unless they shit the bed…
Give me the P5 Champions(now is 4) and the next 4 best teams. If a G5 like Cincinnati year before last is in there(and got ass blasted by Bama) so be it. 8 is enough. BIG 12 Champ, B1G Champ, ACC Champ and SEC Champ and next best 4..
Point is, this “voting” like old days on who’s the best two to play is fun. It’s entertaining. It crowns…someone. But is not accurate in any fucking way. That’s IF we’re trying to say who’s the NC. If we aren’t, let’s not calm them the NC. Pretty Fukn simple. Call em…the choice of whoever. But not the NC. -
I agree with this 100%. Expanding to 12 is all about money, 8 would be perfect. Having byes is dumb.SECDAWG said:
I also think “8 is enough”….SWIDT??TheRoarOfTheCrowd said:Well i do like the idea of a playoff, but think it should be a top 8 affair and get rid of the conference championships because as the argument goes, most would be able to agree on the top 8
No way 9-12 is beating #1 unless they shit the bed…
Give me the P5 Champions(now is 4) and the next 4 best teams. If a G5 like Cincinnati year before last is in there(and got ass blasted by Bama) so be it. 8 is enough. BIG 12 Champ, B1G Champ, ACC Champ and SEC Champ and next best 4..
Point is, this “voting” like old days on who’s the best two to play is fun. It’s entertaining. It crowns…someone. But is not accurate in any fucking way. That’s IF we’re trying to say who’s the NC. If we aren’t, let’s not calm them the NC. Pretty Fukn simple. Call em…the choice of whoever. But not the NC. -
I don’t remember who I was to talking to about this ridiculous, but awesome, idea but we mused about making the whole damn regular season a playoff. Once you lose, you’re OUT! It would be like March Madness for football.EsophagealFeces said:
I agree with this 100%. Expanding to 12 is all about money, 8 would be perfect. Having byes is dumb.SECDAWG said:
I also think “8 is enough”….SWIDT??TheRoarOfTheCrowd said:Well i do like the idea of a playoff, but think it should be a top 8 affair and get rid of the conference championships because as the argument goes, most would be able to agree on the top 8
No way 9-12 is beating #1 unless they shit the bed…
Give me the P5 Champions(now is 4) and the next 4 best teams. If a G5 like Cincinnati year before last is in there(and got ass blasted by Bama) so be it. 8 is enough. BIG 12 Champ, B1G Champ, ACC Champ and SEC Champ and next best 4..
Point is, this “voting” like old days on who’s the best two to play is fun. It’s entertaining. It crowns…someone. But is not accurate in any fucking way. That’s IF we’re trying to say who’s the NC. If we aren’t, let’s not calm them the NC. Pretty Fukn simple. Call em…the choice of whoever. But not the NC.
No one would ever go for it of course because it would majorly fuck up the @Logistics for starters, but it would be more entertaining than a 12 game playoff in my mind. -
This conversation is about CROWNING a NC. The very words, National Champion. How the Fuck can someone VOTE a NC?? That’s the old way and a lot of why we in the South balk on that idea. There’s many here including those I referenced still adhere to that idea. My point is, and many don’t like it, is there is only one way to find out WHO is the NC. Take this year…if it was strictly a vote, and this is happened in the past, left out an undefeated Auburn team, it’s a farce. No way can sports writers and soccer moms(I’m being facetious) VOTE the TWO best teams for a National Champion. And Crown em as such. Either We? Wanna find out. Or Not.EsophagealFeces said:
I agree with this 100%. Expanding to 12 is all about money, 8 would be perfect. Having byes is dumb.SECDAWG said:
I also think “8 is enough”….SWIDT??TheRoarOfTheCrowd said:Well i do like the idea of a playoff, but think it should be a top 8 affair and get rid of the conference championships because as the argument goes, most would be able to agree on the top 8
No way 9-12 is beating #1 unless they shit the bed…
Give me the P5 Champions(now is 4) and the next 4 best teams. If a G5 like Cincinnati year before last is in there(and got ass blasted by Bama) so be it. 8 is enough. BIG 12 Champ, B1G Champ, ACC Champ and SEC Champ and next best 4..
Point is, this “voting” like old days on who’s the best two to play is fun. It’s entertaining. It crowns…someone. But is not accurate in any fucking way. That’s IF we’re trying to say who’s the NC. If we aren’t, let’s not calm them the NC. Pretty Fukn simple. Call em…the choice of whoever. But not the NC.
I have my picks. You have yours. We? Have many undefeated teams and good teams this year.
Bottom line. If we’re crowning a “National Champion” , the very term, “National Champion “, there’s only ONE WAY to find out. Or we can just ad lib it and have “Co Champs”…”Voted Champs” etc.
Bowls are fine. And we can all say who we THINK is the best. But it’s not accurate. Your best ain’t my best.
Getting back to yer point, 8 is enough. We don’t need 24 teams in there to decide this. This year proves we need 8. Bama could NOW be the best. They ain’t the same team as when TX beat em. By a long fucking shot. But 12? Meh. Bama May beat GA this weekend and if they get left out would be a travesty. To even think the SEC champ couldn’t beat 4 other top teams is ludicrous. But we are at 4. Now.
Point is, if WE are crowning a NC, let em prove it. Or let’s not and call it a voted good. -
Kill the conference title games.
12 teams is too many.
All games should be played on campus until the natty. Bowls are dead. -
Disagree about the bowls. Yeah, many players opt out if it’s not playoff or NC implications but they serve a purpose for the younger players and the fans. Pretty much meaningless ie SEC “don’t wanna be there” stuff but it’s an extra game an practice and I, including other fans, enjoy the bowls. And watching the young guys play. They are pretty meaningless. But entertaining all the same. The Fans just need to realize the difference.BleachedAnusDawg said:Kill the conference title games.
12 teams is too many.
All games should be played on campus until the natty. Bowls are dead. -
I’ll make it even simpler. The 4 P5 champs play in the semis.SECDAWG said:
I also think “8 is enough”….SWIDT??TheRoarOfTheCrowd said:Well i do like the idea of a playoff, but think it should be a top 8 affair and get rid of the conference championships because as the argument goes, most would be able to agree on the top 8
No way 9-12 is beating #1 unless they shit the bed…
Give me the P5 Champions(now is 4) and the next 4 best teams. If a G5 like Cincinnati year before last is in there(and got ass blasted by Bama) so be it. 8 is enough. BIG 12 Champ, B1G Champ, ACC Champ and SEC Champ and next best 4..
Point is, this “voting” like old days on who’s the best two to play is fun. It’s entertaining. It crowns…someone. But is not accurate in any fucking way. That’s IF we’re trying to say who’s the NC. If we aren’t, let’s not calm them the NC. Pretty Fukn simple. Call em…the choice of whoever. But not the NC.
And my middle ground offer is 6 teams. Top 2 conference champs get a bye. Quarterfinal matchups are the 3rd and 4th conference champs host 5 & 6. This way a team like a Georgia this year could lose the CCG but still have a chance.
8 teams might work in a year like this but I think too often, you’re gonna see teams at 7 and below getting smoked. -
Even with 12 teams it is still a vote to get in
And that will be the next crusade for the whiners
-
So many “experts” don’t seem to get this. The whining will continue and it will be just as loud.RaceBannon said:Even with 12 teams it is still a vote to get in
And that will be the next crusade for the whiners
Arguing the strength of record for 9-3 teams is going to be special. -
Yeah, that must be it. It's not all the weird southern redneck talk.SECDAWG said:
Oh hell yeah you can. You just see my handle starting with “SEC” and you check out…Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
I can't understand him drunk or soberEsophagealFeces said:Drunk SECDAWG is best SECDAWG