Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Duck Fans Feeling Confident
Comments
-
I think we have consensus. When @bisonduck ventures outside his specialty of injury reports, he sounds dumb.
-
Ducks always forget that Washington had to play an Oregon team that has been dominating every game they play. While Oregon skipped Oregon and got to play a weak Washington team that keeps scrapping by with lucky wins.
-
-
Tell yourself what you need to hear. I know that it would catastrophic to go 12-0 and then lose to Oregon. It cannot happen for UW.TheHB said:
When you say stuff like that, you sound dumb.bisonduck said:
Our league isn't good outside of UW and Oregon. How is your schedule any harder? Sure, you got Arizona vs Colorado before our first game.TheHB said:
Disagree that it's clear UW has regressed. UW has played a difficult schedule, and I would say its defense is better prepared today than it was when it played Oregon. The offense is fine. Running game is better today than it was when UW played Oregon. Passing game is still strong, as well.bisonduck said:
I am not sure why people cannot tip the cap to Penix in that game and UW's defense for coming up strong in that game.FireCohen said:So Oregon did not lose they just ran out of time both times
I also cannot understand why UW fans have this persecution complex about Oregon fans and nation media confidence in a rematch. It's clear that UW has regressed and Oregon progressed. That's not to say that UW is going to get punked but the spread looks like it would be -7.5 in a rematch in Vegas. It might even be more after the Oregon State game.
These ideas are not mutually exclusive.
The "persecution" you speak of is all about the fact that Oregon fans and national media are so certain about this regression. I really hope the duck team thinks UW has regressed. In reality, the team is much tougher and battle-tested than it was the first time the teams played.
It's one thing to win a bunch of games 50-14, which is nice. But the first time you find yourself down a few points, that's when the strong find out what they're all about. Ducks didn't handle it well the last time. UW has.
If the spread is -7.5 in favor of Oregon, that's easy money for UW.
You are not more battle tested. You just have played close games that shouldn't have been close.
It would be devastating. -
Exaggerate much?bisonduck said:
Tell yourself what you need to hear. I know that it would catastrophic to go 12-0 and then lose to Oregon. It cannot happen for UW.TheHB said:
When you say stuff like that, you sound dumb.bisonduck said:
Our league isn't good outside of UW and Oregon. How is your schedule any harder? Sure, you got Arizona vs Colorado before our first game.TheHB said:
Disagree that it's clear UW has regressed. UW has played a difficult schedule, and I would say its defense is better prepared today than it was when it played Oregon. The offense is fine. Running game is better today than it was when UW played Oregon. Passing game is still strong, as well.bisonduck said:
I am not sure why people cannot tip the cap to Penix in that game and UW's defense for coming up strong in that game.FireCohen said:So Oregon did not lose they just ran out of time both times
I also cannot understand why UW fans have this persecution complex about Oregon fans and nation media confidence in a rematch. It's clear that UW has regressed and Oregon progressed. That's not to say that UW is going to get punked but the spread looks like it would be -7.5 in a rematch in Vegas. It might even be more after the Oregon State game.
These ideas are not mutually exclusive.
The "persecution" you speak of is all about the fact that Oregon fans and national media are so certain about this regression. I really hope the duck team thinks UW has regressed. In reality, the team is much tougher and battle-tested than it was the first time the teams played.
It's one thing to win a bunch of games 50-14, which is nice. But the first time you find yourself down a few points, that's when the strong find out what they're all about. Ducks didn't handle it well the last time. UW has.
If the spread is -7.5 in favor of Oregon, that's easy money for UW.
You are not more battle tested. You just have played close games that shouldn't have been close.
-
Battle tested much???TheHB said:
Exaggerate much?bisonduck said:
Tell yourself what you need to hear. I know that it would catastrophic to go 12-0 and then lose to Oregon. It cannot happen for UW.TheHB said:
When you say stuff like that, you sound dumb.bisonduck said:
Our league isn't good outside of UW and Oregon. How is your schedule any harder? Sure, you got Arizona vs Colorado before our first game.TheHB said:
Disagree that it's clear UW has regressed. UW has played a difficult schedule, and I would say its defense is better prepared today than it was when it played Oregon. The offense is fine. Running game is better today than it was when UW played Oregon. Passing game is still strong, as well.bisonduck said:
I am not sure why people cannot tip the cap to Penix in that game and UW's defense for coming up strong in that game.FireCohen said:So Oregon did not lose they just ran out of time both times
I also cannot understand why UW fans have this persecution complex about Oregon fans and nation media confidence in a rematch. It's clear that UW has regressed and Oregon progressed. That's not to say that UW is going to get punked but the spread looks like it would be -7.5 in a rematch in Vegas. It might even be more after the Oregon State game.
These ideas are not mutually exclusive.
The "persecution" you speak of is all about the fact that Oregon fans and national media are so certain about this regression. I really hope the duck team thinks UW has regressed. In reality, the team is much tougher and battle-tested than it was the first time the teams played.
It's one thing to win a bunch of games 50-14, which is nice. But the first time you find yourself down a few points, that's when the strong find out what they're all about. Ducks didn't handle it well the last time. UW has.
If the spread is -7.5 in favor of Oregon, that's easy money for UW.
You are not more battle tested. You just have played close games that shouldn't have been close.
LMFAO. We played the same damn schedule save one team. -
-
You don't understand the concept. Take it to the Refuge or stick to injuries. You're out of your element, Mike.bisonduck said:
Battle tested much???TheHB said:
Exaggerate much?bisonduck said:
Tell yourself what you need to hear. I know that it would catastrophic to go 12-0 and then lose to Oregon. It cannot happen for UW.TheHB said:
When you say stuff like that, you sound dumb.bisonduck said:
Our league isn't good outside of UW and Oregon. How is your schedule any harder? Sure, you got Arizona vs Colorado before our first game.TheHB said:
Disagree that it's clear UW has regressed. UW has played a difficult schedule, and I would say its defense is better prepared today than it was when it played Oregon. The offense is fine. Running game is better today than it was when UW played Oregon. Passing game is still strong, as well.bisonduck said:
I am not sure why people cannot tip the cap to Penix in that game and UW's defense for coming up strong in that game.FireCohen said:So Oregon did not lose they just ran out of time both times
I also cannot understand why UW fans have this persecution complex about Oregon fans and nation media confidence in a rematch. It's clear that UW has regressed and Oregon progressed. That's not to say that UW is going to get punked but the spread looks like it would be -7.5 in a rematch in Vegas. It might even be more after the Oregon State game.
These ideas are not mutually exclusive.
The "persecution" you speak of is all about the fact that Oregon fans and national media are so certain about this regression. I really hope the duck team thinks UW has regressed. In reality, the team is much tougher and battle-tested than it was the first time the teams played.
It's one thing to win a bunch of games 50-14, which is nice. But the first time you find yourself down a few points, that's when the strong find out what they're all about. Ducks didn't handle it well the last time. UW has.
If the spread is -7.5 in favor of Oregon, that's easy money for UW.
You are not more battle tested. You just have played close games that shouldn't have been close.
LMFAO. We played the same damn schedule save one team. -
Battle tested, LMFAO.TheHB said:
You don't understand the concept. Take it to the Refuge or stick to injuries. You're out of your element, Mike.bisonduck said:
Battle tested much???TheHB said:
Exaggerate much?bisonduck said:
Tell yourself what you need to hear. I know that it would catastrophic to go 12-0 and then lose to Oregon. It cannot happen for UW.TheHB said:
When you say stuff like that, you sound dumb.bisonduck said:
Our league isn't good outside of UW and Oregon. How is your schedule any harder? Sure, you got Arizona vs Colorado before our first game.TheHB said:
Disagree that it's clear UW has regressed. UW has played a difficult schedule, and I would say its defense is better prepared today than it was when it played Oregon. The offense is fine. Running game is better today than it was when UW played Oregon. Passing game is still strong, as well.bisonduck said:
I am not sure why people cannot tip the cap to Penix in that game and UW's defense for coming up strong in that game.FireCohen said:So Oregon did not lose they just ran out of time both times
I also cannot understand why UW fans have this persecution complex about Oregon fans and nation media confidence in a rematch. It's clear that UW has regressed and Oregon progressed. That's not to say that UW is going to get punked but the spread looks like it would be -7.5 in a rematch in Vegas. It might even be more after the Oregon State game.
These ideas are not mutually exclusive.
The "persecution" you speak of is all about the fact that Oregon fans and national media are so certain about this regression. I really hope the duck team thinks UW has regressed. In reality, the team is much tougher and battle-tested than it was the first time the teams played.
It's one thing to win a bunch of games 50-14, which is nice. But the first time you find yourself down a few points, that's when the strong find out what they're all about. Ducks didn't handle it well the last time. UW has.
If the spread is -7.5 in favor of Oregon, that's easy money for UW.
You are not more battle tested. You just have played close games that shouldn't have been close.
LMFAO. We played the same damn schedule save one team.
-
How did Ducks fare in their only close game?bisonduck said:
Battle tested, LMFAO.TheHB said:
You don't understand the concept. Take it to the Refuge or stick to injuries. You're out of your element, Mike.bisonduck said:
Battle tested much???TheHB said:
Exaggerate much?bisonduck said:
Tell yourself what you need to hear. I know that it would catastrophic to go 12-0 and then lose to Oregon. It cannot happen for UW.TheHB said:
When you say stuff like that, you sound dumb.bisonduck said:
Our league isn't good outside of UW and Oregon. How is your schedule any harder? Sure, you got Arizona vs Colorado before our first game.TheHB said:
Disagree that it's clear UW has regressed. UW has played a difficult schedule, and I would say its defense is better prepared today than it was when it played Oregon. The offense is fine. Running game is better today than it was when UW played Oregon. Passing game is still strong, as well.bisonduck said:
I am not sure why people cannot tip the cap to Penix in that game and UW's defense for coming up strong in that game.FireCohen said:So Oregon did not lose they just ran out of time both times
I also cannot understand why UW fans have this persecution complex about Oregon fans and nation media confidence in a rematch. It's clear that UW has regressed and Oregon progressed. That's not to say that UW is going to get punked but the spread looks like it would be -7.5 in a rematch in Vegas. It might even be more after the Oregon State game.
These ideas are not mutually exclusive.
The "persecution" you speak of is all about the fact that Oregon fans and national media are so certain about this regression. I really hope the duck team thinks UW has regressed. In reality, the team is much tougher and battle-tested than it was the first time the teams played.
It's one thing to win a bunch of games 50-14, which is nice. But the first time you find yourself down a few points, that's when the strong find out what they're all about. Ducks didn't handle it well the last time. UW has.
If the spread is -7.5 in favor of Oregon, that's easy money for UW.
You are not more battle tested. You just have played close games that shouldn't have been close.
LMFAO. We played the same damn schedule save one team.
-
Wow...way to dunk on me. You battled tested on these boards, bro?TheHB said:
How did Ducks fare in their only close game?bisonduck said:
Battle tested, LMFAO.TheHB said:
You don't understand the concept. Take it to the Refuge or stick to injuries. You're out of your element, Mike.bisonduck said:
Battle tested much???TheHB said:
Exaggerate much?bisonduck said:
Tell yourself what you need to hear. I know that it would catastrophic to go 12-0 and then lose to Oregon. It cannot happen for UW.TheHB said:
When you say stuff like that, you sound dumb.bisonduck said:
Our league isn't good outside of UW and Oregon. How is your schedule any harder? Sure, you got Arizona vs Colorado before our first game.TheHB said:
Disagree that it's clear UW has regressed. UW has played a difficult schedule, and I would say its defense is better prepared today than it was when it played Oregon. The offense is fine. Running game is better today than it was when UW played Oregon. Passing game is still strong, as well.bisonduck said:
I am not sure why people cannot tip the cap to Penix in that game and UW's defense for coming up strong in that game.FireCohen said:So Oregon did not lose they just ran out of time both times
I also cannot understand why UW fans have this persecution complex about Oregon fans and nation media confidence in a rematch. It's clear that UW has regressed and Oregon progressed. That's not to say that UW is going to get punked but the spread looks like it would be -7.5 in a rematch in Vegas. It might even be more after the Oregon State game.
These ideas are not mutually exclusive.
The "persecution" you speak of is all about the fact that Oregon fans and national media are so certain about this regression. I really hope the duck team thinks UW has regressed. In reality, the team is much tougher and battle-tested than it was the first time the teams played.
It's one thing to win a bunch of games 50-14, which is nice. But the first time you find yourself down a few points, that's when the strong find out what they're all about. Ducks didn't handle it well the last time. UW has.
If the spread is -7.5 in favor of Oregon, that's easy money for UW.
You are not more battle tested. You just have played close games that shouldn't have been close.
LMFAO. We played the same damn schedule save one team.
That's the point...UW shouldn't be battle tested. The only game that was a pick'em on your schedule was Oregon. The play over the 2nd half turned the Beavlet game into a pick'em. -
You should understand #rootedinsubstance better than anyone.bisonduck said:
Wow...way to dunk on me. You battled tested on these boards, bro?TheHB said:
How did Ducks fare in their only close game?bisonduck said:
Battle tested, LMFAO.TheHB said:
You don't understand the concept. Take it to the Refuge or stick to injuries. You're out of your element, Mike.bisonduck said:
Battle tested much???TheHB said:
Exaggerate much?bisonduck said:
Tell yourself what you need to hear. I know that it would catastrophic to go 12-0 and then lose to Oregon. It cannot happen for UW.TheHB said:
When you say stuff like that, you sound dumb.bisonduck said:
Our league isn't good outside of UW and Oregon. How is your schedule any harder? Sure, you got Arizona vs Colorado before our first game.TheHB said:
Disagree that it's clear UW has regressed. UW has played a difficult schedule, and I would say its defense is better prepared today than it was when it played Oregon. The offense is fine. Running game is better today than it was when UW played Oregon. Passing game is still strong, as well.bisonduck said:
I am not sure why people cannot tip the cap to Penix in that game and UW's defense for coming up strong in that game.FireCohen said:So Oregon did not lose they just ran out of time both times
I also cannot understand why UW fans have this persecution complex about Oregon fans and nation media confidence in a rematch. It's clear that UW has regressed and Oregon progressed. That's not to say that UW is going to get punked but the spread looks like it would be -7.5 in a rematch in Vegas. It might even be more after the Oregon State game.
These ideas are not mutually exclusive.
The "persecution" you speak of is all about the fact that Oregon fans and national media are so certain about this regression. I really hope the duck team thinks UW has regressed. In reality, the team is much tougher and battle-tested than it was the first time the teams played.
It's one thing to win a bunch of games 50-14, which is nice. But the first time you find yourself down a few points, that's when the strong find out what they're all about. Ducks didn't handle it well the last time. UW has.
If the spread is -7.5 in favor of Oregon, that's easy money for UW.
You are not more battle tested. You just have played close games that shouldn't have been close.
LMFAO. We played the same damn schedule save one team.
That's the point...UW shouldn't be battle tested. The only game that was a pick'em on your schedule was Oregon. The play over the 2nd half turned the Beavlet game into a pick'em. -
Yep. Even for BisonDuck that was fucking stupid.Canadawg said:
UW is literally #1 in SOR. Possibly the most retarded take I've ever heardbisonduck said:
So, this battle tested theory is based on a playing OSU at home vs away since our last game. You got Arizona before our last game and when they didn't look as strong.Sources said:
Beav and Arizona (both on the road) vs Colorado and WSU (both at home for duckies)bisonduck said:
Our league isn't good outside of UW and Oregon. How is your schedule any harder? Sure, you got Arizona vs Colorado before our first game.TheHB said:
Disagree that it's clear UW has regressed. UW has played a difficult schedule, and I would say its defense is better prepared today than it was when it played Oregon. The offense is fine. Running game is better today than it was when UW played Oregon. Passing game is still strong, as well.bisonduck said:
I am not sure why people cannot tip the cap to Penix in that game and UW's defense for coming up strong in that game.FireCohen said:So Oregon did not lose they just ran out of time both times
I also cannot understand why UW fans have this persecution complex about Oregon fans and nation media confidence in a rematch. It's clear that UW has regressed and Oregon progressed. That's not to say that UW is going to get punked but the spread looks like it would be -7.5 in a rematch in Vegas. It might even be more after the Oregon State game.
These ideas are not mutually exclusive.
The "persecution" you speak of is all about the fact that Oregon fans and national media are so certain about this regression. I really hope the duck team thinks UW has regressed. In reality, the team is much tougher and battle-tested than it was the first time the teams played.
It's one thing to win a bunch of games 50-14, which is nice. But the first time you find yourself down a few points, that's when the strong find out what they're all about. Ducks didn't handle it well the last time. UW has.
If the spread is -7.5 in favor of Oregon, that's easy money for UW.
You are not more battle tested. You just have played close games that shouldn't have been close. -
Hopefully the Ducks can win by a safety against Beavlet.TheHB said:
You should understand #rootedinsubstance better than anyone.bisonduck said:
Wow...way to dunk on me. You battled tested on these boards, bro?TheHB said:
How did Ducks fare in their only close game?bisonduck said:
Battle tested, LMFAO.TheHB said:
You don't understand the concept. Take it to the Refuge or stick to injuries. You're out of your element, Mike.bisonduck said:
Battle tested much???TheHB said:
Exaggerate much?bisonduck said:
Tell yourself what you need to hear. I know that it would catastrophic to go 12-0 and then lose to Oregon. It cannot happen for UW.TheHB said:
When you say stuff like that, you sound dumb.bisonduck said:
Our league isn't good outside of UW and Oregon. How is your schedule any harder? Sure, you got Arizona vs Colorado before our first game.TheHB said:
Disagree that it's clear UW has regressed. UW has played a difficult schedule, and I would say its defense is better prepared today than it was when it played Oregon. The offense is fine. Running game is better today than it was when UW played Oregon. Passing game is still strong, as well.bisonduck said:
I am not sure why people cannot tip the cap to Penix in that game and UW's defense for coming up strong in that game.FireCohen said:So Oregon did not lose they just ran out of time both times
I also cannot understand why UW fans have this persecution complex about Oregon fans and nation media confidence in a rematch. It's clear that UW has regressed and Oregon progressed. That's not to say that UW is going to get punked but the spread looks like it would be -7.5 in a rematch in Vegas. It might even be more after the Oregon State game.
These ideas are not mutually exclusive.
The "persecution" you speak of is all about the fact that Oregon fans and national media are so certain about this regression. I really hope the duck team thinks UW has regressed. In reality, the team is much tougher and battle-tested than it was the first time the teams played.
It's one thing to win a bunch of games 50-14, which is nice. But the first time you find yourself down a few points, that's when the strong find out what they're all about. Ducks didn't handle it well the last time. UW has.
If the spread is -7.5 in favor of Oregon, that's easy money for UW.
You are not more battle tested. You just have played close games that shouldn't have been close.
LMFAO. We played the same damn schedule save one team.
That's the point...UW shouldn't be battle tested. The only game that was a pick'em on your schedule was Oregon. The play over the 2nd half turned the Beavlet game into a pick'em.
#battletested #academicprowess -
Going 5-0 since beating Oregon is regression. Make sense? Duck sense!bisonduck said:
I am not sure why people cannot tip the cap to Penix in that game and UW's defense for coming up strong.FireCohen said:So Oregon did not lose they just ran out of time both times
I also cannot understand why UW fans have this persecution complex about Oregon fan and the national media confidence in a rematch. It's clear that UW has regressed and Oregon progressed. That's not to say that UW is going to get punked but the spread looks like it would be -7.5 in a rematch in Vegas. It might even be more after the Oregon State game.
These ideas are not mutually exclusive. -
Ducks fans should hang a banner of the game lines
-
Oregon is nine and your SOR will look worse after Oregon smashes some Beavlet.EwaDawg said:
Yep. Even for BisonDuck that was fucking stupid.Canadawg said:
UW is literally #1 in SOR. Possibly the most retarded take I've ever heardbisonduck said:
So, this battle tested theory is based on a playing OSU at home vs away since our last game. You got Arizona before our last game and when they didn't look as strong.Sources said:
Beav and Arizona (both on the road) vs Colorado and WSU (both at home for duckies)bisonduck said:
Our league isn't good outside of UW and Oregon. How is your schedule any harder? Sure, you got Arizona vs Colorado before our first game.TheHB said:
Disagree that it's clear UW has regressed. UW has played a difficult schedule, and I would say its defense is better prepared today than it was when it played Oregon. The offense is fine. Running game is better today than it was when UW played Oregon. Passing game is still strong, as well.bisonduck said:
I am not sure why people cannot tip the cap to Penix in that game and UW's defense for coming up strong in that game.FireCohen said:So Oregon did not lose they just ran out of time both times
I also cannot understand why UW fans have this persecution complex about Oregon fans and nation media confidence in a rematch. It's clear that UW has regressed and Oregon progressed. That's not to say that UW is going to get punked but the spread looks like it would be -7.5 in a rematch in Vegas. It might even be more after the Oregon State game.
These ideas are not mutually exclusive.
The "persecution" you speak of is all about the fact that Oregon fans and national media are so certain about this regression. I really hope the duck team thinks UW has regressed. In reality, the team is much tougher and battle-tested than it was the first time the teams played.
It's one thing to win a bunch of games 50-14, which is nice. But the first time you find yourself down a few points, that's when the strong find out what they're all about. Ducks didn't handle it well the last time. UW has.
If the spread is -7.5 in favor of Oregon, that's easy money for UW.
You are not more battle tested. You just have played close games that shouldn't have been close.
#battletested -
Beat a rival, then pop offbisonduck said:
Oregon is nine and your SOR will look worse after Oregon smashes some Beavlet.EwaDawg said:
Yep. Even for BisonDuck that was fucking stupid.Canadawg said:
UW is literally #1 in SOR. Possibly the most retarded take I've ever heardbisonduck said:
So, this battle tested theory is based on a playing OSU at home vs away since our last game. You got Arizona before our last game and when they didn't look as strong.Sources said:
Beav and Arizona (both on the road) vs Colorado and WSU (both at home for duckies)bisonduck said:
Our league isn't good outside of UW and Oregon. How is your schedule any harder? Sure, you got Arizona vs Colorado before our first game.TheHB said:
Disagree that it's clear UW has regressed. UW has played a difficult schedule, and I would say its defense is better prepared today than it was when it played Oregon. The offense is fine. Running game is better today than it was when UW played Oregon. Passing game is still strong, as well.bisonduck said:
I am not sure why people cannot tip the cap to Penix in that game and UW's defense for coming up strong in that game.FireCohen said:So Oregon did not lose they just ran out of time both times
I also cannot understand why UW fans have this persecution complex about Oregon fans and nation media confidence in a rematch. It's clear that UW has regressed and Oregon progressed. That's not to say that UW is going to get punked but the spread looks like it would be -7.5 in a rematch in Vegas. It might even be more after the Oregon State game.
These ideas are not mutually exclusive.
The "persecution" you speak of is all about the fact that Oregon fans and national media are so certain about this regression. I really hope the duck team thinks UW has regressed. In reality, the team is much tougher and battle-tested than it was the first time the teams played.
It's one thing to win a bunch of games 50-14, which is nice. But the first time you find yourself down a few points, that's when the strong find out what they're all about. Ducks didn't handle it well the last time. UW has.
If the spread is -7.5 in favor of Oregon, that's easy money for UW.
You are not more battle tested. You just have played close games that shouldn't have been close.
#battletested -
I don’t care if UW wins the rest of their games by one point. Just win baby.bisonduck said:
Wow...way to dunk on me. You battled tested on these boards, bro?TheHB said:
How did Ducks fare in their only close game?bisonduck said:
Battle tested, LMFAO.TheHB said:
You don't understand the concept. Take it to the Refuge or stick to injuries. You're out of your element, Mike.bisonduck said:
Battle tested much???TheHB said:
Exaggerate much?bisonduck said:
Tell yourself what you need to hear. I know that it would catastrophic to go 12-0 and then lose to Oregon. It cannot happen for UW.TheHB said:
When you say stuff like that, you sound dumb.bisonduck said:
Our league isn't good outside of UW and Oregon. How is your schedule any harder? Sure, you got Arizona vs Colorado before our first game.TheHB said:
Disagree that it's clear UW has regressed. UW has played a difficult schedule, and I would say its defense is better prepared today than it was when it played Oregon. The offense is fine. Running game is better today than it was when UW played Oregon. Passing game is still strong, as well.bisonduck said:
I am not sure why people cannot tip the cap to Penix in that game and UW's defense for coming up strong in that game.FireCohen said:So Oregon did not lose they just ran out of time both times
I also cannot understand why UW fans have this persecution complex about Oregon fans and nation media confidence in a rematch. It's clear that UW has regressed and Oregon progressed. That's not to say that UW is going to get punked but the spread looks like it would be -7.5 in a rematch in Vegas. It might even be more after the Oregon State game.
These ideas are not mutually exclusive.
The "persecution" you speak of is all about the fact that Oregon fans and national media are so certain about this regression. I really hope the duck team thinks UW has regressed. In reality, the team is much tougher and battle-tested than it was the first time the teams played.
It's one thing to win a bunch of games 50-14, which is nice. But the first time you find yourself down a few points, that's when the strong find out what they're all about. Ducks didn't handle it well the last time. UW has.
If the spread is -7.5 in favor of Oregon, that's easy money for UW.
You are not more battle tested. You just have played close games that shouldn't have been close.
LMFAO. We played the same damn schedule save one team.
That's the point...UW shouldn't be battle tested. The only game that was a pick'em on your schedule was Oregon. The play over the 2nd half turned the Beavlet game into a pick'em. -
@bisonduck might be the shittiest poster of the year. It's one thing to have lukewarm takes that are indistinguishable from every other duck dipshit on the internet, but this flaccid cunt doesn't even bother to marry it with any remarkable level of humor or vitriol.
At least raging homos like @SFGbob and @46XiJCAB are unique in their obscene anger, tantrums, and general levels of astounding stupidity. Meanwhile @bisonduck just queefs out a few forgettable takes, feebly argues it, and the the rest of us just yawn and scroll past. He could die tomorrow and we'd forget he ever posted here by the afternoon. -
Yeah, I missed the obvious battle testedness of UW. #battletestedGreenRiverGatorz said:@bisonduck might be the shittiest poster of the year. It's one thing to have lukewarm takes that are indistinguishable from every other duck dipshit on the internet, but this flaccid cunt doesn't even bother to marry it with any remarkable level of humor or vitriol.
At least raging homos like @SFGbob and @46XiJCAB are unique in their obscene anger, tantrums, and general levels of astounding stupidity. Meanwhile @bisonduck just queefs out a few forgettable takes, feebly argues it, and the the rest of us just yawn and scroll past. He could die tomorrow and we'd forget he ever posted here by the afternoon. -
I also believe the perceived "regression" can be explained by certain injuries, weather benefiting the opponent and the crud.TheHB said:
Disagree that it's clear UW has regressed. UW has played a difficult schedule, and I would say its defense is better prepared today than it was when it played Oregon. The offense is fine. Running game is better today than it was when UW played Oregon. Passing game is still strong, as well.bisonduck said:
I am not sure why people cannot tip the cap to Penix in that game and UW's defense for coming up strong in that game.FireCohen said:So Oregon did not lose they just ran out of time both times
I also cannot understand why UW fans have this persecution complex about Oregon fans and nation media confidence in a rematch. It's clear that UW has regressed and Oregon progressed. That's not to say that UW is going to get punked but the spread looks like it would be -7.5 in a rematch in Vegas. It might even be more after the Oregon State game.
These ideas are not mutually exclusive. -
In a close game, I will take the coach and team who have actually won close games versus the coach and team who have not.bisonduck said:
Yeah, I missed the obvious battle testedness of UW. #battletestedGreenRiverGatorz said:@bisonduck might be the shittiest poster of the year. It's one thing to have lukewarm takes that are indistinguishable from every other duck dipshit on the internet, but this flaccid cunt doesn't even bother to marry it with any remarkable level of humor or vitriol.
At least raging homos like @SFGbob and @46XiJCAB are unique in their obscene anger, tantrums, and general levels of astounding stupidity. Meanwhile @bisonduck just queefs out a few forgettable takes, feebly argues it, and the the rest of us just yawn and scroll past. He could die tomorrow and we'd forget he ever posted here by the afternoon. -
Chinned for saying & showing vitriol. Kudos.GreenRiverGatorz said:@bisonduck might be the shittiest poster of the year. It's one thing to have lukewarm takes that are indistinguishable from every other duck dipshit on the internet, but this flaccid cunt doesn't even bother to marry it with any remarkable level of humor or vitriol.
At least raging homos like @SFGbob and @46XiJCAB are unique in their obscene anger, tantrums, and general levels of astounding stupidity. Meanwhile @bisonduck just queefs out a few forgettable takes, feebly argues it, and the the rest of us just yawn and scroll past. He could die tomorrow and we'd forget he ever posted here by the afternoon. -
That’s what happens when you only read your own clippings. It’s understandable.bisonduck said:
Yeah, I missed the obvious battle testedness of UW. #battletestedGreenRiverGatorz said:@bisonduck might be the shittiest poster of the year. It's one thing to have lukewarm takes that are indistinguishable from every other duck dipshit on the internet, but this flaccid cunt doesn't even bother to marry it with any remarkable level of humor or vitriol.
At least raging homos like @SFGbob and @46XiJCAB are unique in their obscene anger, tantrums, and general levels of astounding stupidity. Meanwhile @bisonduck just queefs out a few forgettable takes, feebly argues it, and the the rest of us just yawn and scroll past. He could die tomorrow and we'd forget he ever posted here by the afternoon. -
The script says that Lanning goes conservative on a critical 4th down when he should go for it.
-
ThisBob_C said:The script says that Lanning goes conservative on a critical 4th down when he should go for it.
-
Sure. Can you see why Oregon fans might be confident though? I just don't think it's unreasonable based on how the 2nd half of the season has unfolded.BleachedAnusDawg said:
In a close game, I will take the coach and team who have actually won close games versus the coach and team who have not.bisonduck said:
Yeah, I missed the obvious battle testedness of UW. #battletestedGreenRiverGatorz said:@bisonduck might be the shittiest poster of the year. It's one thing to have lukewarm takes that are indistinguishable from every other duck dipshit on the internet, but this flaccid cunt doesn't even bother to marry it with any remarkable level of humor or vitriol.
At least raging homos like @SFGbob and @46XiJCAB are unique in their obscene anger, tantrums, and general levels of astounding stupidity. Meanwhile @bisonduck just queefs out a few forgettable takes, feebly argues it, and the the rest of us just yawn and scroll past. He could die tomorrow and we'd forget he ever posted here by the afternoon.
Beavlet could win and all of this is moot. Sure we'd all have a good laugh. -
I've watched a lot of UW. If Penix finds his accuracy he had in the the first half of the year, it will be a helluva game. Nix and the Oregon passing game has evolved, which I think will reduce need to chase points and convert 4th downs.TheHB said:
That’s what happens when you only read your own clippings. It’s understandable.bisonduck said:
Yeah, I missed the obvious battle testedness of UW. #battletestedGreenRiverGatorz said:@bisonduck might be the shittiest poster of the year. It's one thing to have lukewarm takes that are indistinguishable from every other duck dipshit on the internet, but this flaccid cunt doesn't even bother to marry it with any remarkable level of humor or vitriol.
At least raging homos like @SFGbob and @46XiJCAB are unique in their obscene anger, tantrums, and general levels of astounding stupidity. Meanwhile @bisonduck just queefs out a few forgettable takes, feebly argues it, and the the rest of us just yawn and scroll past. He could die tomorrow and we'd forget he ever posted here by the afternoon. -
Take it to the refuge, guysm
