Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

UW “survived” while Oregon “drubbed” SC

2»

Comments

  • Options
    JoeEDangerouslyJoeEDangerously Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,290
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Founders Club
    These gifs are tarnishing DDJ’s sig gif
  • Options
    chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,730
    First Comment First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    Jesus Christ, lock the gates on this homo already

    Just looking over this thread. From a late comer's perspective, what I see is that Damone crossed a line here that even his #1 ass kisser won't quietly drop a chin on. I say well done.
  • Options
    PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,818
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Founders Club
  • Options
    Doog_de_JourDoog_de_Jour Member Posts: 7,958
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    TheHB said:

    TheHB said:

    Which is a better performance:

    1. A back and forth close one possession game into the fourth quarter (gave up 28 in a half)

    Or

    2. Leading by 2+ scores from after the 8 min mark of the 3rd Q, only for the box score to seem closer with 2 meaningless TD’s by USC late.

    (Gave up less all game than UW did in 1 half)

    UW can play this game, too.
    Just look at the ESPN win probability throughout both games vs USC and you can understand why one is considered a drubbing and the other is considered surviving.

    It absolutely wasn't Damone. I hate banning guys when we're committed to 99% free speech. But spamming our board with that elicit homosexual material was coming from either someone trying to troll/shit on the board or someone who thinks its funny but doesn't understand our humor and was going over-the-top in trying to fit in. Nevertheless, we have rules about outright porn on the main board. I hope I didn't pull the trigger too quickly in case he was just a doofus in need of guidance. But I tend to think he was simply trying to shit on the board and gum it up.
    I was having a really bad morning and in my foul mood I broke one of my personal rules and fed the troll. For that, I apologize.

    Yeah, I also hope it wasn’t some awkward individual trying to fit in either. Just some people need to read the room.
  • Options
    RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,401
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club

    TheHB said:

    TheHB said:

    Which is a better performance:

    1. A back and forth close one possession game into the fourth quarter (gave up 28 in a half)

    Or

    2. Leading by 2+ scores from after the 8 min mark of the 3rd Q, only for the box score to seem closer with 2 meaningless TD’s by USC late.

    (Gave up less all game than UW did in 1 half)

    UW can play this game, too.
    Just look at the ESPN win probability throughout both games vs USC and you can understand why one is considered a drubbing and the other is considered surviving.

    It absolutely wasn't Damone. I hate banning guys when we're committed to 99% free speech. But spamming our board with that elicit homosexual material was coming from either someone trying to troll/shit on the board or someone who thinks its funny but doesn't understand our humor and was going over-the-top in trying to fit in. Nevertheless, we have rules about outright porn on the main board. I hope I didn't pull the trigger too quickly in case he was just a doofus in need of guidance. But I tend to think he was simply trying to shit on the board and gum it up.
    Good move Stalin.
  • Options
    TheHBTheHB Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,432
    First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary
    Swaye's Wigwam

    TheHB said:

    TheHB said:

    Which is a better performance:

    1. A back and forth close one possession game into the fourth quarter (gave up 28 in a half)

    Or

    2. Leading by 2+ scores from after the 8 min mark of the 3rd Q, only for the box score to seem closer with 2 meaningless TD’s by USC late.

    (Gave up less all game than UW did in 1 half)

    UW can play this game, too.
    Just look at the ESPN win probability throughout both games vs USC and you can understand why one is considered a drubbing and the other is considered surviving.

    It absolutely wasn't Damone. I hate banning guys when we're committed to 99% free speech. But spamming our board with that elicit homosexual material was coming from either someone trying to troll/shit on the board or someone who thinks its funny but doesn't understand our humor and was going over-the-top in trying to fit in. Nevertheless, we have rules about outright porn on the main board. I hope I didn't pull the trigger too quickly in case he was just a doofus in need of guidance. But I tend to think he was simply trying to shit on the board and gum it up.
    Either way, it’s interesting.
  • Options
    CanadawgCanadawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,056
    5 Awesomes First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment
    Swaye's Wigwam
    edited November 2023
    What did I miss/ has been deleted

    Edit. Nevermind I got me reads down
  • Options
    NorwegianHuskyNorwegianHusky Member Posts: 3,422
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    TheHB said:

    Which is a better performance:

    1. A back and forth close one possession game into the fourth quarter (gave up 28 in a half)

    Or

    2. Leading by 2+ scores from after the 8 min mark of the 3rd Q, only for the box score to seem closer with 2 meaningless TD’s by USC late.

    (Gave up less all game than UW did in 1 half)

    UW can play this game, too.
    Just look at the ESPN win probability throughout both games vs USC and you can understand why one is considered a drubbing and the other is considered surviving.


    Also in this context, it means UW “survived” the gaffe and was able to overcome and win despite the potential momentum swing.

    If anything it is being complimentary.


    Huh? Every one of these I look at says 100%
    This is what the well educated amongst us would call a “non sequitur”
    All time post. Can't believe you banned such an educated man, Derek. I'm learning so much.
Sign In or Register to comment.