UW “survived” while Oregon “drubbed” SC

LawDawg1

No matter UW won by more against SC on the road. The “survived” narrative continued this week too

TheHB

We all know what the narrative would be today if Oregon beat USC by 10 on the road and UW beat USC by nine at home.

But none of it matters if UW keeps winning.

LawDawg1

What about a neutral field!!!!!!

BowDownToInsertPenix

Which is a better performance:

1. A back and forth close one possession game into the fourth quarter (gave up 28 in a half)

Or

2. Leading by 2+ scores from after the 8 min mark of the 3rd Q, only for the box score to seem closer with 2 meaningless TD’s by USC late.

(Gave up less all game than UW did in 1 half)

TheHB

BowDownToInsertPenix said:

Which is a better performance:

1. A back and forth close one possession game into the fourth quarter (gave up 28 in a half)

Or

2. Leading by 2+ scores from after the 8 min mark of the 3rd Q, only for the box score to seem closer with 2 meaningless TD’s by USC late.

(Gave up less all game than UW did in 1 half)

UW can play this game, too.

BowDownToInsertPenix

TheHB said:

BowDownToInsertPenix said:

Which is a better performance:

1. A back and forth close one possession game into the fourth quarter (gave up 28 in a half)

Or

2. Leading by 2+ scores from after the 8 min mark of the 3rd Q, only for the box score to seem closer with 2 meaningless TD’s by USC late.

(Gave up less all game than UW did in 1 half)

UW can play this game, too.

Just look at the ESPN win probability throughout both games vs USC and you can understand why one is considered a drubbing and the other is considered surviving.


Also in this context, it means UW “survived” the gaffe and was able to overcome and win despite the potential momentum swing.

If anything it is being complimentary.

TheHB

BowDownToInsertPenix said:

TheHB said:

BowDownToInsertPenix said:

Which is a better performance:

1. A back and forth close one possession game into the fourth quarter (gave up 28 in a half)

Or

2. Leading by 2+ scores from after the 8 min mark of the 3rd Q, only for the box score to seem closer with 2 meaningless TD’s by USC late.

(Gave up less all game than UW did in 1 half)

UW can play this game, too.

Just look at the ESPN win probability throughout both games vs USC and you can understand why one is considered a drubbing and the other is considered surviving.

FireTheJanitor

BowDownToInsertPenix said:

TheHB said:

BowDownToInsertPenix said:

Which is a better performance:

1. A back and forth close one possession game into the fourth quarter (gave up 28 in a half)

Or

2. Leading by 2+ scores from after the 8 min mark of the 3rd Q, only for the box score to seem closer with 2 meaningless TD’s by USC late.

(Gave up less all game than UW did in 1 half)

UW can play this game, too.

Just look at the ESPN win probability throughout both games vs USC and you can understand why one is considered a drubbing and the other is considered surviving.


Also in this context, it means UW “survived” the gaffe and was able to overcome and win despite the potential momentum swing.

If anything it is being complimentary.

Huh? Every one of these I look at says 100%

BowDownToInsertPenix

FireTheJanitor said:

BowDownToInsertPenix said:

TheHB said:

BowDownToInsertPenix said:

Which is a better performance:

1. A back and forth close one possession game into the fourth quarter (gave up 28 in a half)

Or

2. Leading by 2+ scores from after the 8 min mark of the 3rd Q, only for the box score to seem closer with 2 meaningless TD’s by USC late.

(Gave up less all game than UW did in 1 half)

UW can play this game, too.

Just look at the ESPN win probability throughout both games vs USC and you can understand why one is considered a drubbing and the other is considered surviving.


Also in this context, it means UW “survived” the gaffe and was able to overcome and win despite the potential momentum swing.

If anything it is being complimentary.

Huh? Every one of these I look at says 100%

This is what the well educated amongst us would call a “non sequitur”

Doog_de_Jour

I really don’t understand why ESPN has such an axe to grind against UW, all the way back to the cupcakes.🧁 🧁🧁

BowDownToInsertPenix

UW education showing through here…

Article is not saying UW was lucky to beat Utah, just that they were able to “survive” the potential upheaval such a gaffe might have cost.

Unfortunately this isn’t ESPN bending over for Penix and declaring his Jesus so it’s not good enough for the perpetually “disrespected” Doogs

Doog_de_Jour

BowDownToInsertPenix said:

UW education showing through here…

Article is not saying UW was lucky to beat Utah, just that they were able to “survive” the potential upheaval such a gaffe might have cost.

Unfortunately this isn’t ESPN bending over for Penix and declaring his Jesus so it’s not good enough for the perpetually “disrespected” Doogs

I’m so looking forward to your inevitable banning.

BowDownToInsertPenix

Doog_de_Jour said:

BowDownToInsertPenix said:

UW education showing through here…

Article is not saying UW was lucky to beat Utah, just that they were able to “survive” the potential upheaval such a gaffe might have cost.

Unfortunately this isn’t ESPN bending over for Penix and declaring his Jesus so it’s not good enough for the perpetually “disrespected” Doogs
<img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/502026l

GreenRiverGatorz

I too am very upset about this outrageous disparity in AI generated bylines

BowDownToInsertPenix

Has anyone considered that “Ducks drub” is a pretty cool alliteration that might be good for generating clicks?

Rooted in substance.

RaceBannon

BowDownToInsertPenix said:

Has anyone considered that “Ducks drub” is a pretty cool alliteration that might be good for generating clicks?

Have you considered killing yourself?

EsophagealFeces

BowDownToInsertPenix said:

TheHB said:

BowDownToInsertPenix said:

Which is a better performance:

1. A back and forth close one possession game into the fourth quarter (gave up 28 in a half)

Or

2. Leading by 2+ scores from after the 8 min mark of the 3rd Q, only for the box score to seem closer with 2 meaningless TD’s by USC late.

(Gave up less all game than UW did in 1 half)

UW can play this game, too.

Just look at the ESPN win probability throughout both games vs USC and you can understand why one is considered a drubbing and the other is considered surviving.


Also in this context, it means UW “survived” the gaffe and was able to overcome and win despite the potential momentum swing.

If anything it is being complimentary.

Win probability is for fags

Doog_de_Jour

BowDownToInsertPenix said:

Doog_de_Jour said:

BowDownToInsertPenix said:

UW education showing through here…

Article is not saying UW was lucky to beat Utah, just that they were able to “survive” the potential upheaval such a gaffe might have cost.

Unfortunately this isn’t ESPN bending over for Penix and declaring his Jesus so it’s not good enough for the perpetually “disrespected” Doogs

I’m so looking forward to your inevitable banning.

Probably because of the homophobic mods no?

On one hand, there’s a small part of me that appreciates your use of those gifs to show some of the double standards of this site, but don’t fucking kid yourself that your use of them is anything but a blatant ham-fisted attempt to stir up trouble.

Your banning won’t be because of any homophobia, it will be because you’re just being a dick.

TheHB

Is it Friday yet?

Doog_de_Jour

BowDownToInsertPenix said:

Doog_de_Jour said:

BowDownToInsertPenix said:

Doog_de_Jour said:

BowDownToInsertPenix said:

UW education showing through here…

Article is not saying UW was lucky to beat Utah, just that they were able to “survive” the potential upheaval such a gaffe might have cost.

Unfortunately this isn’t ESPN bending over for Penix and declaring his Jesus so it’s not good enough for the perpetually “disrespected” Doogs

I’m so looking forward to your inevitable banning.

Probably because of the homophobic mods no?

On one hand, there’s a small part of me that appreciates your use of those gifs to show some of the double standards of this site, but don’t fucking kid yourself that your use of them is anything but a blatant ham-fisted attempt to stir up trouble.

Your banning won’t be because of any homophobia, it will be because you’re just being a dick.

Doog_de_Jour said:

BowDownToInsertPenix said:

Doog_de_Jour said:

BowDownToInsertPenix said:

UW education showing through here…

Article is not saying UW was lucky to beat Utah, just that they were able to “survive” the potential upheaval such a gaffe might have cost.

Unfortunately this isn’t ESPN bending over for Penix and declaring his Jesus so it’s not good enough for the perpetually “disrespected” Doogs

I’m so looking forward to your inevitable banning.

Probably because of the homophobic mods no?

On one hand, there’s a small part of me that appreciates your use of those gifs to show some of the double standards of this site, but don’t fucking kid yourself that your use of them is anything but a blatant ham-fisted attempt to stir up trouble.

Your banning won’t be because of any homophobia, it will be because you’re just being a dick.

I am a gay Ducks fan what other GIF’s would I even use?

UWerentThereMan

Jesus Christ, lock the gates on this homo already