HuskyFanPodcast: Stanford Preview

http://traffic.libsyn.com/huskyfanpodcast/Sep23Stanfordpreview.mp3

1 Hour podcast, serious football discussion throughout with a few barbs at Bleenor & others sprinkled in.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

TierbsHsotBoobs

I'm liking the Doog of the week section. Good chit.

I'm waiting for my weekly $20 royalty checks for that.

RoadDawg55

You can tell the season is definitely starting. Tone of the entire podcast was more urgent and it was mostly football talk. I echo the reserved skepticism. I disagree that 10 wins this year wouldn't be a very bad and very big data point against Petersen. That expectation hasn't changed for me.
10+ is still my expectation. I will be pissed if Sark doesn't get there, but I'm not going to call for him to be fire I he doesn't because it will never happen.
FTFY

Get it now?
I gave Sark three years before wanting him gone. The difference is Petersen is a real coach. If Petersen doesn't win 10, this year is a failure. Petersen has a plan, while Sark winged it the whole time.
I knew there was something wrong with you.

This argument has been recycled here many times. Sark didn't deserve the job and was a shitty hire. He never should have gotten the job, but after his first two years there wasn't really any reason to fire him. If he would have missed a bowl game in year two then yes, but he didn't and he won it. The standards were low enough at the time that that was enough to get him a third year.

ThomasFremont

You can tell the season is definitely starting. Tone of the entire podcast was more urgent and it was mostly football talk. I echo the reserved skepticism. I disagree that 10 wins this year wouldn't be a very bad and very big data point against Petersen. That expectation hasn't changed for me.
10+ is still my expectation. I will be pissed if Sark doesn't get there, but I'm not going to call for him to be fire I he doesn't because it will never happen.
FTFY

Get it now?
I gave Sark three years before wanting him gone. The difference is Petersen is a real coach. If Petersen doesn't win 10, this year is a failure. Petersen has a plan, while Sark winged it the whole time.
I knew there was something wrong with you.
This argument has been recycled here many times. Sark didn't deserve the job and was a shitty hire. He never should have gotten the job, but after his first two years there wasn't really any reason to fire him. If he would have missed a bowl game in year two then yes, but he didn't and he won it. The standards were low enough at the time that that was enough to get him a third year.

Keep digging.

I was just fucking with you before, but you've actually gone full doog.

Sark was a shitty hire and didn't deserve the job...but according to you he deserved a third year?

Which one is it? You can't have it both ways.

jecornel

Thomas, are you bored? Not sure what you are getting at here. I think road was crystal clear in his response? No? You see different?

RoadDawg55

You can tell the season is definitely starting. Tone of the entire podcast was more urgent and it was mostly football talk. I echo the reserved skepticism. I disagree that 10 wins this year wouldn't be a very bad and very big data point against Petersen. That expectation hasn't changed for me.
10+ is still my expectation. I will be pissed if Sark doesn't get there, but I'm not going to call for him to be fire I he doesn't because it will never happen.
FTFY

Get it now?
I gave Sark three years before wanting him gone. The difference is Petersen is a real coach. If Petersen doesn't win 10, this year is a failure. Petersen has a plan, while Sark winged it the whole time.
I knew there was something wrong with you.
This argument has been recycled here many times. Sark didn't deserve the job and was a shitty hire. He never should have gotten the job, but after his first two years there wasn't really any reason to fire him. If he would have missed a bowl game in year two then yes, but he didn't and he won it. The standards were low enough at the time that that was enough to get him a third year.
Keep digging.

I was just fucking with you before, but you've actually gone full doog.

Sark was a shitty hire and didn't deserve the job...but according to you he deserved a third year?

Which one is it? You can't have it both ways.

Whatever. It shouldn't be that hard to understand.

ThomasFremont

You can tell the season is definitely starting. Tone of the entire podcast was more urgent and it was mostly football talk. I echo the reserved skepticism. I disagree that 10 wins this year wouldn't be a very bad and very big data point against Petersen. That expectation hasn't changed for me.
10+ is still my expectation. I will be pissed if Sark doesn't get there, but I'm not going to call for him to be fire I he doesn't because it will never happen.
FTFY

Get it now?
I gave Sark three years before wanting him gone. The difference is Petersen is a real coach. If Petersen doesn't win 10, this year is a failure. Petersen has a plan, while Sark winged it the whole time.
I knew there was something wrong with you.
This argument has been recycled here many times. Sark didn't deserve the job and was a shitty hire. He never should have gotten the job, but after his first two years there wasn't really any reason to fire him. If he would have missed a bowl game in year two then yes, but he didn't and he won it. The standards were low enough at the time that that was enough to get him a third year.
Keep digging.

I was just fucking with you before, but you've actually gone full doog.

Sark was a shitty hire and didn't deserve the job...but according to you he deserved a third year?

Which one is it? You can't have it both ways.
Whatever. It shouldn't be that hard to understand.

Actually, I'm struggling to understand your FS logic re: Sark.

Didn't realize you were such a fan of his.

Doogles

I don't see anything wrong with accepting that Sark didn't deserve the job, but still deserved a year 3. Nothing Doogish there. You can play nastradamus all night, but at the end of the day, in year 2 he won a bowl game. Our D looked great that game as well, There was hope that Ta'amu was going to be what Danny Shelton has been for us so far.

allpurpleallgold

You can tell the season is definitely starting. Tone of the entire podcast was more urgent and it was mostly football talk. I echo the reserved skepticism. I disagree that 10 wins this year wouldn't be a very bad and very big data point against Petersen. That expectation hasn't changed for me.
10+ is still my expectation. I will be pissed if Sark doesn't get there, but I'm not going to call for him to be fire I he doesn't because it will never happen.
FTFY

Get it now?
I gave Sark three years before wanting him gone. The difference is Petersen is a real coach. If Petersen doesn't win 10, this year is a failure. Petersen has a plan, while Sark winged it the whole time.
I knew there was something wrong with you.
This argument has been recycled here many times. Sark didn't deserve the job and was a shitty hire. He never should have gotten the job, but after his first two years there wasn't really any reason to fire him. If he would have missed a bowl game in year two then yes, but he didn't and he won it. The standards were low enough at the time that that was enough to get him a third year.

The reason to fire him was that he was a shitty coach. If it took you three years to figure that out you're dumb.

The standards is a retarded argument. Did you think he should be fired or not? If not then you're a complete fucktard.

Sark got 15 games from me and I supported the hire.