Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

HuskyFanPodcast: Stanford Preview

2»

Comments

  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,129
    Gladstone said:

    You can tell the season is definitely starting. Tone of the entire podcast was more urgent and it was mostly football talk. I echo the reserved skepticism. I disagree that 10 wins this year wouldn't be a very bad and very big data point against Petersen. That expectation hasn't changed for me.

    10+ is still my expectation. I will be pissed if Peterman doesn't get there, but I'm not going to call for him to be fire I he doesn't because it will never happen.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SpoonieLuv
    SpoonieLuv Member Posts: 5,463
    Not a single sluggo explanation.

    How am I suppose to know whose responsibility the flanker falls to when the safety's cross with the nickel package in?

    Fucking amateur hour.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    RoadDawg55 said:

    Gladstone said:

    You can tell the season is definitely starting. Tone of the entire podcast was more urgent and it was mostly football talk. I echo the reserved skepticism. I disagree that 10 wins this year wouldn't be a very bad and very big data point against Petersen. That expectation hasn't changed for me.

    10+ is still my expectation. I will be pissed if Sark doesn't get there, but I'm not going to call for him to be fire I he doesn't because it will never happen.
    FTFY

    Get it now?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,129
    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Gladstone said:

    You can tell the season is definitely starting. Tone of the entire podcast was more urgent and it was mostly football talk. I echo the reserved skepticism. I disagree that 10 wins this year wouldn't be a very bad and very big data point against Petersen. That expectation hasn't changed for me.

    10+ is still my expectation. I will be pissed if Sark doesn't get there, but I'm not going to call for him to be fire I he doesn't because it will never happen.
    FTFY

    Get it now?
    I gave Sark three years before wanting him gone. The difference is Petersen is a real coach. If Petersen doesn't win 10, this year is a failure. Petersen has a plan, while Sark winged it the whole time.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WilburHooksHands
    WilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804
    ThomasFremont said:


    Get it now?

    It's been said time and time again, probably even on this bored, that the step between mediocrity and greatness is a fuckload bigger than the step between dogshit and mediocrity. IDGAF and YDGAF that we won 9 games last year, the product was fucking mediocre. You know that. Acting like Petersen is in the same fucking coaching stratosphere as Sark, which is what you're implying by name switching is FS. You might as well be posting on Doogman throwing shit like out there.

    Saban was fucking 7-6 in his first season and improved by exactly 1 win.

    LIMFPO
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • JaWarrenJaHooker
    JaWarrenJaHooker Member Posts: 2,122
    I could do without the 12 talk. Didn't agree with all of your hot takes but it was still a good show... Just give Fremont some free pub... He 'll come around
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    JaWarrenJaHooker said:

    I could do without the 12 talk. Didn't agree with all of your hot takes but it was still a good show... Just give Fremont some free pub... He 'll come around

    Finally, someone who GETS IT.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Gladstone said:

    You can tell the season is definitely starting. Tone of the entire podcast was more urgent and it was mostly football talk. I echo the reserved skepticism. I disagree that 10 wins this year wouldn't be a very bad and very big data point against Petersen. That expectation hasn't changed for me.

    10+ is still my expectation. I will be pissed if Sark doesn't get there, but I'm not going to call for him to be fire I he doesn't because it will never happen.
    FTFY

    Get it now?
    I gave Sark three years before wanting him gone. The difference is Petersen is a real coach. If Petersen doesn't win 10, this year is a failure. Petersen has a plan, while Sark winged it the whole time.
    I knew there was something wrong with you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WilburHooksHands
    WilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804
    SpoonieLuv said:

    Not a single sluggo explanation.

    How am I suppose to know whose responsibility the flanker falls to when the safety's cross with the nickel package in?

    Fucking amateur hour.

    If you watch the video of Rick watching his son play, he calls out a sluggo route at around 44 seconds.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    There wasn't any 12 talk.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Swaye said:

    I'm liking the Doog of the week section. Good chit.

    I'm waiting for my weekly $20 royalty checks for that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,129
    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Gladstone said:

    You can tell the season is definitely starting. Tone of the entire podcast was more urgent and it was mostly football talk. I echo the reserved skepticism. I disagree that 10 wins this year wouldn't be a very bad and very big data point against Petersen. That expectation hasn't changed for me.

    10+ is still my expectation. I will be pissed if Sark doesn't get there, but I'm not going to call for him to be fire I he doesn't because it will never happen.
    FTFY

    Get it now?
    I gave Sark three years before wanting him gone. The difference is Petersen is a real coach. If Petersen doesn't win 10, this year is a failure. Petersen has a plan, while Sark winged it the whole time.
    I knew there was something wrong with you.
    This argument has been recycled here many times. Sark didn't deserve the job and was a shitty hire. He never should have gotten the job, but after his first two years there wasn't really any reason to fire him. If he would have missed a bowl game in year two then yes, but he didn't and he won it. The standards were low enough at the time that that was enough to get him a third year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Gladstone said:

    You can tell the season is definitely starting. Tone of the entire podcast was more urgent and it was mostly football talk. I echo the reserved skepticism. I disagree that 10 wins this year wouldn't be a very bad and very big data point against Petersen. That expectation hasn't changed for me.

    10+ is still my expectation. I will be pissed if Sark doesn't get there, but I'm not going to call for him to be fire I he doesn't because it will never happen.
    FTFY

    Get it now?
    I gave Sark three years before wanting him gone. The difference is Petersen is a real coach. If Petersen doesn't win 10, this year is a failure. Petersen has a plan, while Sark winged it the whole time.
    I knew there was something wrong with you.
    This argument has been recycled here many times. Sark didn't deserve the job and was a shitty hire. He never should have gotten the job, but after his first two years there wasn't really any reason to fire him. If he would have missed a bowl game in year two then yes, but he didn't and he won it. The standards were low enough at the time that that was enough to get him a third year.
    Keep digging.

    I was just fucking with you before, but you've actually gone full doog.

    Sark was a shitty hire and didn't deserve the job...but according to you he deserved a third year?

    Which one is it? You can't have it both ways.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    Thomas, are you bored? Not sure what you are getting at here. I think road was crystal clear in his response? No? You see different?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,129
    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Gladstone said:

    You can tell the season is definitely starting. Tone of the entire podcast was more urgent and it was mostly football talk. I echo the reserved skepticism. I disagree that 10 wins this year wouldn't be a very bad and very big data point against Petersen. That expectation hasn't changed for me.

    10+ is still my expectation. I will be pissed if Sark doesn't get there, but I'm not going to call for him to be fire I he doesn't because it will never happen.
    FTFY

    Get it now?
    I gave Sark three years before wanting him gone. The difference is Petersen is a real coach. If Petersen doesn't win 10, this year is a failure. Petersen has a plan, while Sark winged it the whole time.
    I knew there was something wrong with you.
    This argument has been recycled here many times. Sark didn't deserve the job and was a shitty hire. He never should have gotten the job, but after his first two years there wasn't really any reason to fire him. If he would have missed a bowl game in year two then yes, but he didn't and he won it. The standards were low enough at the time that that was enough to get him a third year.
    Keep digging.

    I was just fucking with you before, but you've actually gone full doog.

    Sark was a shitty hire and didn't deserve the job...but according to you he deserved a third year?

    Which one is it? You can't have it both ways.
    Whatever. It shouldn't be that hard to understand.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Gladstone said:

    You can tell the season is definitely starting. Tone of the entire podcast was more urgent and it was mostly football talk. I echo the reserved skepticism. I disagree that 10 wins this year wouldn't be a very bad and very big data point against Petersen. That expectation hasn't changed for me.

    10+ is still my expectation. I will be pissed if Sark doesn't get there, but I'm not going to call for him to be fire I he doesn't because it will never happen.
    FTFY

    Get it now?
    I gave Sark three years before wanting him gone. The difference is Petersen is a real coach. If Petersen doesn't win 10, this year is a failure. Petersen has a plan, while Sark winged it the whole time.
    I knew there was something wrong with you.
    This argument has been recycled here many times. Sark didn't deserve the job and was a shitty hire. He never should have gotten the job, but after his first two years there wasn't really any reason to fire him. If he would have missed a bowl game in year two then yes, but he didn't and he won it. The standards were low enough at the time that that was enough to get him a third year.
    Keep digging.

    I was just fucking with you before, but you've actually gone full doog.

    Sark was a shitty hire and didn't deserve the job...but according to you he deserved a third year?

    Which one is it? You can't have it both ways.
    Whatever. It shouldn't be that hard to understand.
    Actually, I'm struggling to understand your FS logic re: Sark.

    Didn't realize you were such a fan of his.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,726 Founders Club
    I don't see anything wrong with accepting that Sark didn't deserve the job, but still deserved a year 3. Nothing Doogish there. You can play nastradamus all night, but at the end of the day, in year 2 he won a bowl game. Our D looked great that game as well, There was hope that Ta'amu was going to be what Danny Shelton has been for us so far.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Gladstone said:

    You can tell the season is definitely starting. Tone of the entire podcast was more urgent and it was mostly football talk. I echo the reserved skepticism. I disagree that 10 wins this year wouldn't be a very bad and very big data point against Petersen. That expectation hasn't changed for me.

    10+ is still my expectation. I will be pissed if Sark doesn't get there, but I'm not going to call for him to be fire I he doesn't because it will never happen.
    FTFY

    Get it now?
    I gave Sark three years before wanting him gone. The difference is Petersen is a real coach. If Petersen doesn't win 10, this year is a failure. Petersen has a plan, while Sark winged it the whole time.
    I knew there was something wrong with you.
    This argument has been recycled here many times. Sark didn't deserve the job and was a shitty hire. He never should have gotten the job, but after his first two years there wasn't really any reason to fire him. If he would have missed a bowl game in year two then yes, but he didn't and he won it. The standards were low enough at the time that that was enough to get him a third year.
    The reason to fire him was that he was a shitty coach. If it took you three years to figure that out you're dumb.

    The standards is a retarded argument. Did you think he should be fired or not? If not then you're a complete fucktard.

    Sark got 15 games from me and I supported the hire.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter