Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

HuskyFanPodcast: Stanford Preview

1235»

Comments

  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Swaye said:

    I'm liking the Doog of the week section. Good chit.

    I'm waiting for my weekly $20 royalty checks for that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,388 Standard Supporter
    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Gladstone said:

    You can tell the season is definitely starting. Tone of the entire podcast was more urgent and it was mostly football talk. I echo the reserved skepticism. I disagree that 10 wins this year wouldn't be a very bad and very big data point against Petersen. That expectation hasn't changed for me.

    10+ is still my expectation. I will be pissed if Sark doesn't get there, but I'm not going to call for him to be fire I he doesn't because it will never happen.
    FTFY

    Get it now?
    I gave Sark three years before wanting him gone. The difference is Petersen is a real coach. If Petersen doesn't win 10, this year is a failure. Petersen has a plan, while Sark winged it the whole time.
    I knew there was something wrong with you.
    This argument has been recycled here many times. Sark didn't deserve the job and was a shitty hire. He never should have gotten the job, but after his first two years there wasn't really any reason to fire him. If he would have missed a bowl game in year two then yes, but he didn't and he won it. The standards were low enough at the time that that was enough to get him a third year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Gladstone said:

    You can tell the season is definitely starting. Tone of the entire podcast was more urgent and it was mostly football talk. I echo the reserved skepticism. I disagree that 10 wins this year wouldn't be a very bad and very big data point against Petersen. That expectation hasn't changed for me.

    10+ is still my expectation. I will be pissed if Sark doesn't get there, but I'm not going to call for him to be fire I he doesn't because it will never happen.
    FTFY

    Get it now?
    I gave Sark three years before wanting him gone. The difference is Petersen is a real coach. If Petersen doesn't win 10, this year is a failure. Petersen has a plan, while Sark winged it the whole time.
    I knew there was something wrong with you.
    This argument has been recycled here many times. Sark didn't deserve the job and was a shitty hire. He never should have gotten the job, but after his first two years there wasn't really any reason to fire him. If he would have missed a bowl game in year two then yes, but he didn't and he won it. The standards were low enough at the time that that was enough to get him a third year.
    Keep digging.

    I was just fucking with you before, but you've actually gone full doog.

    Sark was a shitty hire and didn't deserve the job...but according to you he deserved a third year?

    Which one is it? You can't have it both ways.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    Thomas, are you bored? Not sure what you are getting at here. I think road was crystal clear in his response? No? You see different?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,388 Standard Supporter
    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Gladstone said:

    You can tell the season is definitely starting. Tone of the entire podcast was more urgent and it was mostly football talk. I echo the reserved skepticism. I disagree that 10 wins this year wouldn't be a very bad and very big data point against Petersen. That expectation hasn't changed for me.

    10+ is still my expectation. I will be pissed if Sark doesn't get there, but I'm not going to call for him to be fire I he doesn't because it will never happen.
    FTFY

    Get it now?
    I gave Sark three years before wanting him gone. The difference is Petersen is a real coach. If Petersen doesn't win 10, this year is a failure. Petersen has a plan, while Sark winged it the whole time.
    I knew there was something wrong with you.
    This argument has been recycled here many times. Sark didn't deserve the job and was a shitty hire. He never should have gotten the job, but after his first two years there wasn't really any reason to fire him. If he would have missed a bowl game in year two then yes, but he didn't and he won it. The standards were low enough at the time that that was enough to get him a third year.
    Keep digging.

    I was just fucking with you before, but you've actually gone full doog.

    Sark was a shitty hire and didn't deserve the job...but according to you he deserved a third year?

    Which one is it? You can't have it both ways.
    Whatever. It shouldn't be that hard to understand.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Gladstone said:

    You can tell the season is definitely starting. Tone of the entire podcast was more urgent and it was mostly football talk. I echo the reserved skepticism. I disagree that 10 wins this year wouldn't be a very bad and very big data point against Petersen. That expectation hasn't changed for me.

    10+ is still my expectation. I will be pissed if Sark doesn't get there, but I'm not going to call for him to be fire I he doesn't because it will never happen.
    FTFY

    Get it now?
    I gave Sark three years before wanting him gone. The difference is Petersen is a real coach. If Petersen doesn't win 10, this year is a failure. Petersen has a plan, while Sark winged it the whole time.
    I knew there was something wrong with you.
    This argument has been recycled here many times. Sark didn't deserve the job and was a shitty hire. He never should have gotten the job, but after his first two years there wasn't really any reason to fire him. If he would have missed a bowl game in year two then yes, but he didn't and he won it. The standards were low enough at the time that that was enough to get him a third year.
    Keep digging.

    I was just fucking with you before, but you've actually gone full doog.

    Sark was a shitty hire and didn't deserve the job...but according to you he deserved a third year?

    Which one is it? You can't have it both ways.
    Whatever. It shouldn't be that hard to understand.
    Actually, I'm struggling to understand your FS logic re: Sark.

    Didn't realize you were such a fan of his.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,794 Founders Club
    I don't see anything wrong with accepting that Sark didn't deserve the job, but still deserved a year 3. Nothing Doogish there. You can play nastradamus all night, but at the end of the day, in year 2 he won a bowl game. Our D looked great that game as well, There was hope that Ta'amu was going to be what Danny Shelton has been for us so far.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Gladstone said:

    You can tell the season is definitely starting. Tone of the entire podcast was more urgent and it was mostly football talk. I echo the reserved skepticism. I disagree that 10 wins this year wouldn't be a very bad and very big data point against Petersen. That expectation hasn't changed for me.

    10+ is still my expectation. I will be pissed if Sark doesn't get there, but I'm not going to call for him to be fire I he doesn't because it will never happen.
    FTFY

    Get it now?
    I gave Sark three years before wanting him gone. The difference is Petersen is a real coach. If Petersen doesn't win 10, this year is a failure. Petersen has a plan, while Sark winged it the whole time.
    I knew there was something wrong with you.
    This argument has been recycled here many times. Sark didn't deserve the job and was a shitty hire. He never should have gotten the job, but after his first two years there wasn't really any reason to fire him. If he would have missed a bowl game in year two then yes, but he didn't and he won it. The standards were low enough at the time that that was enough to get him a third year.
    The reason to fire him was that he was a shitty coach. If it took you three years to figure that out you're dumb.

    The standards is a retarded argument. Did you think he should be fired or not? If not then you're a complete fucktard.

    Sark got 15 games from me and I supported the hire.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter