Fake Narratives Open Thread
Dan made the kids work and get better during the bye. Kalen didn’t.
Inclement weather will hurt Washington’s passing game. Won’t hurt Bo’s though.
Washington hasn’t played anybody with a SOS at 49. Oregons is better at 97.
1 Troy Franklin > Odunze, McMillan and Polk.
Bucky Irving is Jim Brown.
Oregons line > Washington’s line. Can’t name anyone on it besides an overrated Seattle kid but still
Bo has the big game advantage with a 2-9 record against ranked teams away from home. Including the neutral field game against Oregon. Booooodacious.
Comments
-
Oregon is rooted in substance. Not for clicks. Watch us unveil bird shit uniforms this week
-
Dan's wife probably is a faker
-
Oregon invented clicks.JoeEDangerously said:Oregon is rooted in substance. Not for clicks. Watch us unveil bird shit uniforms this week
-
Dan’s in full control of this team. Watch him have a coke fueled meltdown on a reporter and tell me it’s not normal!
-
You forgot:
Threads like these are just as gay as the mined content. -
Their metrics are based on beating the shit out of a team that America still thinks is good, at home. If you're squeaking out a win against ASU playing their 9th/10th OL and 3rd string quarterback, and broken dude named Skattebo, you are a bottom 3/4 PAC 12 team who will get blasted by all of the true 1-5 teams especially if you're on the road.
Arizona is probably the only team in the league to play their best game on the road and not have a noticeable dropoff. That is just how the league is this year unless you're playing at one of the Bay schools. -
Media and social media dorks love Oregon. You have to remember that going into last year's game the narrative was if Oregon could beat Georgia if they played again based on Oregon beating UCLA at home as part of UCLA's yearly second half collapse and beating up crap teams. Then UW won in Eugene but about 8 days later it was like it never happened again.
Just gotta win and advance. -
Oregon pulled their starters in the second half of most games this year. Washington didn't.
-
Here's my favorite I've heard from several "experts"
"Oregon is just tougher than Washington."
I'm sorry, but how is toughness being measured? What is the formula for that? It seems like made-up bullshit.
I think Oregon has a good team and could win this game, but a lot of these narratives just don't make any sense. -
Just like last year, it's easier to be on the road and the underdog. One team has less pressure than the other.
-
The partial eclipse will reek havoc on Washington's passing game.
-
Who the fuck are you?Seven_Eleven said:Just like last year, it's easier to be on the road and the underdog. One team has less pressure than the other.
-
-
“We have a different team this year on defense. We got rid of the four and five star guys we didn’t want anymore and replaced them with everyone else’s four and five star guys they didn’t want anymore.” Big difference.
-
-
Wait...do...do you actually think that people think you are somebody?EwaDawg said:
Nobody. Thanks for confirming.Seven_Eleven said: -
On HCH? What little fucking person gives a flying fuck? Welcome to the internet, junior.Seven_Eleven said:
Wait...do...do you actually think that people think you are somebody?EwaDawg said:
Nobody. Thanks for confirming.Seven_Eleven said: -
Huh?WoolleyDoog said:You have to remember that going into last year's game the narrative was if Oregon could beat Georgia if they played again based on Oregon beating UCLA at home as part of UCLA's yearly second half collapse and beating up crap teams.
-
No fucking shit retard. I'm not the dipshit here asking who people are, or saying they are nobodyEwaDawg said:
On HCH? What little fucking person gives a flying fuck? Welcome to the internet, junior.Seven_Eleven said:
Wait...do...do you actually think that people think you are somebody?EwaDawg said:
Nobody. Thanks for confirming.Seven_Eleven said: -
And I thanked you for confirming it. And you took umbrage smegma breath. Either give up or take creepy's intro logic class.Seven_Eleven said:
No fucking shit retard. I'm not the dipshit here asking who people are, or saying they are nobodyEwaDawg said:
On HCH? What little fucking person gives a flying fuck? Welcome to the internet, junior.Seven_Eleven said:
Wait...do...do you actually think that people think you are somebody?EwaDawg said:
Nobody. Thanks for confirming.Seven_Eleven said: -
Monday mornings i’m gonna start a new thread of bookmarked Twitter posts from the previous week
-
I can’t believe nobody mentions our clearly superior culture.
How do you measure culture? Well, one indicator is when absolutely nobody fucking leaves. HTH. -
There are many fine people on both sides of the rivalry
FAKE NEWS -
There are no good people on either side.RaceBannon said:There are many fine people on both sides of the rivalry
FAKE NEWS -
You seem a little on edge, pal. Can I send you a xanax?Seven_Eleven said:
No fucking shit retard. I'm not the dipshit here asking who people are, or saying they are nobodyEwaDawg said:
On HCH? What little fucking person gives a flying fuck? Welcome to the internet, junior.Seven_Eleven said:
Wait...do...do you actually think that people think you are somebody?EwaDawg said:
Nobody. Thanks for confirming.Seven_Eleven said:
I understand though, handling the ups and downs of a #6 vs #7 match up can be tough. -
Literally no one with any type of audience said this was a narrative. You guys love to make things up to be mad aboutWoolleyDoog said:Media and social media dorks love Oregon. You have to remember that going into last year's game the narrative was if Oregon could beat Georgia if they played again based on Oregon beating UCLA at home as part of UCLA's yearly second half collapse and beating up crap teams. Then UW won in Eugene but about 8 days later it was like it never happened again.
Just gotta win and advance. -
I know of no one claiming that Oregon would beat UGA in a rematch. Maybe we’re reading different media.WoolleyDoog said:Media and social media dorks love Oregon. You have to remember that going into last year's game the narrative was if Oregon could beat Georgia if they played again based on Oregon beating UCLA at home as part of UCLA's yearly second half collapse and beating up crap teams. Then UW won in Eugene but about 8 days later it was like it never happened again.
Just gotta win and advance. -
So MSU didn’t want Bernard? Miss. St. didn’t want Johnson? OSU didn’t want Muhammad?JoeEDangerously said:“We have a different team this year on defense. We got rid of the four and five star guys we didn’t want anymore and replaced them with everyone else’s four and five star guys they didn’t want anymore.” Big difference.
Oregon portal additions have improved their D and that’s not even debatable if you have eyes.
I’ve read no outrageous claims that they’re the 85’ Bears. -
The only media that counts is the HCH pod!!46XiJCAB said:
I know of no one claiming that Oregon would beat UGA in a rematch. Maybe we’re reading different media.WoolleyDoog said:Media and social media dorks love Oregon. You have to remember that going into last year's game the narrative was if Oregon could beat Georgia if they played again based on Oregon beating UCLA at home as part of UCLA's yearly second half collapse and beating up crap teams. Then UW won in Eugene but about 8 days later it was like it never happened again.
Just gotta win and advance. -
That’s gonna be wild, man.HuskyJW said:Monday mornings i’m gonna start a new thread of bookmarked Twitter posts from the previous week
