OFFICIAL 2023 6-Day War Thread
Comments
-
Yeah Israel is 1000% innocent
-
Funny how the pretensions the tug had to being anti war evaporated.
Haven't heard, "we shouldn't sell arms to Isreal" or "they brought this on themselves by shelling Gaza" yet. Anyone want to take any of that out for a spin? -
This is all Obama from the basement. The gay Muslim ordered the money release and most likely colluded with the enemy. American terrorism in reality.
-
Anti Ukraine warUW_Doog_Bot said:Funny how the pretensions the tug had to being anti war evaporated.
Haven't heard, "we shouldn't sell arms to Isreal" or "they brought this on themselves by shelling Gaza" yet. Anyone want to take any of that out for a spin?
Hope this helps
People here oppose aid to Israel too
Free country -
The Throbber is not in favor of war.UW_Doog_Bot said:Funny how the pretensions the tug had to being anti war evaporated.
Haven't heard, "we shouldn't sell arms to Isreal" or "they brought this on themselves by shelling Gaza" yet. Anyone want to take any of that out for a spin?
The Throbber is in favor of not swallowing propaganda hook line and sinker.
-
I’m cool with the selling of arms to Israel, the free money handouts not so much.UW_Doog_Bot said:Funny how the pretensions the tug had to being anti war evaporated.
Haven't heard, "we shouldn't sell arms to Isreal" or "they brought this on themselves by shelling Gaza" yet. Anyone want to take any of that out for a spin? -
It would be a shame if quality joobs are lost in the conflict too.
-
If the US didn't give a dime to either side Israel would winBob_C said:
I’m cool with the selling of arms to Israel, the free money handouts not so much.UW_Doog_Bot said:Funny how the pretensions the tug had to being anti war evaporated.
Haven't heard, "we shouldn't sell arms to Isreal" or "they brought this on themselves by shelling Gaza" yet. Anyone want to take any of that out for a spin?
Rather easily -
So it be.RaceBannon said:
If the US didn't give a dime to either side Israel would winBob_C said:
I’m cool with the selling of arms to Israel, the free money handouts not so much.UW_Doog_Bot said:Funny how the pretensions the tug had to being anti war evaporated.
Haven't heard, "we shouldn't sell arms to Isreal" or "they brought this on themselves by shelling Gaza" yet. Anyone want to take any of that out for a spin?
Rather easily -
Isreal doesnt need additional weapons to annihilate Hamas.
Not the case with Ukraine.
Hamas attacking Isreal happens with or without the US giving Iran money, which was retarded don't twist.
When it's in your doctrine to kills Jews, you kill Jews.
Religion of peace indeed -
White supremacistsGrundleStiltzkin said: -
The Jews will not replace them.RaceBannon said:
White supremacistsGrundleStiltzkin said: -
I'm fine selling them whatever. I'm not okay writing them a blank check and having them in the pocket of the six corporations who give us 90% of lamestream news, plus probably 75% of politicians. I'm also tired of anyone who questions them being labelled as anti-semitic. Arabs and Jews have had wars for thousdands of years. It's not really my problem. Just like U crane.UW_Doog_Bot said:Funny how the pretensions the tug had to being anti war evaporated.
Haven't heard, "we shouldn't sell arms to Isreal" or "they brought this on themselves by shelling Gaza" yet. Anyone want to take any of that out for a spin? -
Soon?RaceBannon said:Weakness within attacked from without
The formula
Coming soon to a country near you
Trust the process and blame the GOP -
WTF?UW_Doog_Bot said:Funny how the pretensions the tug had to being anti war evaporated.
Haven't heard, "we shouldn't sell arms to Isreal" or "they brought this on themselves by shelling Gaza" yet. Anyone want to take any of that out for a spin? -
I support selling of arms to both.RoadTrip said:
WTF?UW_Doog_Bot said:Funny how the pretensions the tug had to being anti war evaporated.
Haven't heard, "we shouldn't sell arms to Isreal" or "they brought this on themselves by shelling Gaza" yet. Anyone want to take any of that out for a spin?
Some here seem to want it one way in one case and another in the other case.
It's up to them to explain how that squares with their principles.
Certainly "anti-war" has evaporated as a defensible stance.
But I'm an old school cold War Reagan kind of hawk. I understand @RaceBannon is a pot smoking hippy. -
"Think of all the innocents, The US should be forcing Israel to the negotiation table to sue for peace right now to end the bloodshed as soon as possible."
-
Sounds like you would be OK with genocide.UW_Doog_Bot said:Funny how the pretensions the tug had to being anti war evaporated.
Haven't heard, "we shouldn't sell arms to Isreal" or "they brought this on themselves by shelling Gaza" yet. Anyone want to take any of that out for a spin? -
Always have beenBleachedAnusDawg said:
Sounds like you would be OK with genocide.UW_Doog_Bot said:Funny how the pretensions the tug had to being anti war evaporated.
Haven't heard, "we shouldn't sell arms to Isreal" or "they brought this on themselves by shelling Gaza" yet. Anyone want to take any of that out for a spin? -
That’s some Nazi shit right there.RaceBannon said:
White supremacistsGrundleStiltzkin said: -
Difference is Israel is capable of winning on their own. In a sense we’ve probably hindered them from actually winning over the years for PR reasons.UW_Doog_Bot said:"Think of all the innocents, The US should be forcing Israel to the negotiation table to sue for peace right now to end the bloodshed as soon as possible."
Let Israel figure it out themselves, pump our own oil and let Europe defend those sea lanes if they feel it’s important. There’s your new winning Middle East policy. -
We have definitely hindered them. The Arabs and Persians can lose a dozen battles with Israel. Israel can't lose a single battle on its territory. Israel gave the Sinai back to Egypt and Gaza and a chunk of the West Bank to the Palis. That has got them what? Having the American and Euro left rooting for an Israeli defeat and encouraging continued Muslim violence without meaningful consequences just means that Israel is closer to turning the Middle East and Iranian capitols into glass.Bob_C said:
Difference is Israel is capable of winning on their own. In a sense we’ve probably hindered them from actually winning over the years for PR reasons.UW_Doog_Bot said:"Think of all the innocents, The US should be forcing Israel to the negotiation table to sue for peace right now to end the bloodshed as soon as possible."
Let Israel figure it out themselves, pump our own oil and let Europe defend those sea lanes if they feel it’s important. There’s your new winning Middle East policy. -
We sell them arms and protected weapons systems. We don't even do that in Ukraine. Full stop.Bob_C said:
Difference is Israel is capable of winning on their own. In a sense we’ve probably hindered them from actually winning over the years for PR reasons.UW_Doog_Bot said:"Think of all the innocents, The US should be forcing Israel to the negotiation table to sue for peace right now to end the bloodshed as soon as possible."
Let Israel figure it out themselves, pump our own oil and let Europe defend those sea lanes if they feel it’s important. There’s your new winning Middle East policy.
We also share sensitive research and intelligence.
That's part of why they can "fend for themselves". -
Bob_C said:
I’m cool with the selling of arms to Israel, the free money handouts not so much.UW_Doog_Bot said:Funny how the pretensions the tug had to being anti war evaporated.
Haven't heard, "we shouldn't sell arms to Isreal" or "they brought this on themselves by shelling Gaza" yet. Anyone want to take any of that out for a spin?
The United States already provides Israel more than $3 billion in military assistance every year, and Mr. Blinken said that much of the equipment from that funding is already “in the pipeline” to be sent to Israel.RaceBannon said:
If the US didn't give a dime to either side Israel would winBob_C said:
I’m cool with the selling of arms to Israel, the free money handouts not so much.UW_Doog_Bot said:Funny how the pretensions the tug had to being anti war evaporated.
Haven't heard, "we shouldn't sell arms to Isreal" or "they brought this on themselves by shelling Gaza" yet. Anyone want to take any of that out for a spin?
Rather easily
Why is the tug ok with sending money to Israel to secure their border instead of securing our own border? -
Libs refuse to secure our border so it's not even on the table these daysUW_Doog_Bot said:Bob_C said:
I’m cool with the selling of arms to Israel, the free money handouts not so much.UW_Doog_Bot said:Funny how the pretensions the tug had to being anti war evaporated.
Haven't heard, "we shouldn't sell arms to Isreal" or "they brought this on themselves by shelling Gaza" yet. Anyone want to take any of that out for a spin?
The United States already provides Israel more than $3 billion in military assistance every year, and Mr. Blinken said that much of the equipment from that funding is already “in the pipeline” to be sent to Israel.RaceBannon said:
If the US didn't give a dime to either side Israel would winBob_C said:
I’m cool with the selling of arms to Israel, the free money handouts not so much.UW_Doog_Bot said:Funny how the pretensions the tug had to being anti war evaporated.
Haven't heard, "we shouldn't sell arms to Isreal" or "they brought this on themselves by shelling Gaza" yet. Anyone want to take any of that out for a spin?
Rather easily
Why is the tug ok with sending money to Israel to secure their border instead of securing our own border? -
I said nor a dime to either sideUW_Doog_Bot said:Bob_C said:
I’m cool with the selling of arms to Israel, the free money handouts not so much.UW_Doog_Bot said:Funny how the pretensions the tug had to being anti war evaporated.
Haven't heard, "we shouldn't sell arms to Isreal" or "they brought this on themselves by shelling Gaza" yet. Anyone want to take any of that out for a spin?
The United States already provides Israel more than $3 billion in military assistance every year, and Mr. Blinken said that much of the equipment from that funding is already “in the pipeline” to be sent to Israel.RaceBannon said:
If the US didn't give a dime to either side Israel would winBob_C said:
I’m cool with the selling of arms to Israel, the free money handouts not so much.UW_Doog_Bot said:Funny how the pretensions the tug had to being anti war evaporated.
Haven't heard, "we shouldn't sell arms to Isreal" or "they brought this on themselves by shelling Gaza" yet. Anyone want to take any of that out for a spin?
Rather easily
Why is the tug ok with sending money to Israel to secure their border instead of securing our own border? -
No one has said that we are cool with sending money to them. Especially since both the Jews and the Muslims (maybe this one is waning) still both hate republicans anyways. We’ve gotten literally nothing for that money.UW_Doog_Bot said:Bob_C said:
I’m cool with the selling of arms to Israel, the free money handouts not so much.UW_Doog_Bot said:Funny how the pretensions the tug had to being anti war evaporated.
Haven't heard, "we shouldn't sell arms to Isreal" or "they brought this on themselves by shelling Gaza" yet. Anyone want to take any of that out for a spin?
The United States already provides Israel more than $3 billion in military assistance every year, and Mr. Blinken said that much of the equipment from that funding is already “in the pipeline” to be sent to Israel.RaceBannon said:
If the US didn't give a dime to either side Israel would winBob_C said:
I’m cool with the selling of arms to Israel, the free money handouts not so much.UW_Doog_Bot said:Funny how the pretensions the tug had to being anti war evaporated.
Haven't heard, "we shouldn't sell arms to Isreal" or "they brought this on themselves by shelling Gaza" yet. Anyone want to take any of that out for a spin?
Rather easily
Why is the tug ok with sending money to Israel to secure their border instead of securing our own border? -
This Tug poster isn’tUW_Doog_Bot said:Bob_C said:
I’m cool with the selling of arms to Israel, the free money handouts not so much.UW_Doog_Bot said:Funny how the pretensions the tug had to being anti war evaporated.
Haven't heard, "we shouldn't sell arms to Isreal" or "they brought this on themselves by shelling Gaza" yet. Anyone want to take any of that out for a spin?
The United States already provides Israel more than $3 billion in military assistance every year, and Mr. Blinken said that much of the equipment from that funding is already “in the pipeline” to be sent to Israel.RaceBannon said:
If the US didn't give a dime to either side Israel would winBob_C said:
I’m cool with the selling of arms to Israel, the free money handouts not so much.UW_Doog_Bot said:Funny how the pretensions the tug had to being anti war evaporated.
Haven't heard, "we shouldn't sell arms to Isreal" or "they brought this on themselves by shelling Gaza" yet. Anyone want to take any of that out for a spin?
Rather easily
Why is the tug ok with sending money to Israel to secure their border instead of securing our own border?
Selling them shit is fine. Giving them a handout. No. -
Ukraine money laundering shill heard from.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Isreal doesnt need additional weapons to annihilate Hamas.
Not the case with Ukraine.
Hamas attacking Isreal happens with or without the US giving Iran money, which was retarded don't twist.
When it's in your doctrine to kills Jews, you kill Jews.
Religion of peace indeed