Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Hardcore Husky Podcast: Arizona Postgame Airing of Grievances

2456

Comments

  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 13,018
    1to392831weretaken said:

    PineapplePirate said:

    Do we have enough players to field a team against Oregon?

    Who all got hurt?
    Tuli didn't finish the game
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EsophagealFeces
    EsophagealFeces Member Posts: 13,463
    1to392831weretaken said:

    PineapplePirate said:

    Do we have enough players to field a team against Oregon?

    Who all got hurt?
    Ale, Tuli, Rome, Westy off the top of my head. Westy and Ale came back in tho
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,919 Founders Club
    Ashley Adamson is only 5’11” . But still.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dirtysouwfdawg
    dirtysouwfdawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,883 Swaye's Wigwam
    YellowSnow said:

    Ashley Adamson is only 5’11” . But still.

    I feel like she’d slow ride to a multiple orgasim event.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WoolleyDoog
    WoolleyDoog Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,965 Founders Club
    DerekJohnson said:

    NeGgaPlEaSe said:

    Do you think this coaching staff was holding stuff back, over looking Arizona?

    Not at all. I don't speak for Joey and Woolley, but as for me, not at all.
    I was actually excited the first couple drives that I think they were putting stuff on tape for teams like Oregon showing they can also dink and dunk a bit and still be effective. Problem is Arizona's game plan made it so UW had little room for error to get a blowout. Also, made it really hard for Arizona to win the game without getting a bunch of breaks.

    Fuck Arizona for playing that way. Their players played hard but their staff was clearly trying to just minimize shit and pray they could keep it close and get breaks. Problem is it sucks to risk injury and shit against a team playing like it's their Super Bowl but also playing to not lose.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • godawgst
    godawgst Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,618 Swaye's Wigwam
    UA used same mo as Beav/Cal/Texas did last year with great success in shortening game and limiting possessions.

    Joe made great point on POD and I was surprised when Wilcox fell behind 14-0 last week he/his OC said screw it we have to score fast and were snapping ball with 20 on play clock.

    UA fell behind by 14 and still stuck to their plan and it worked in terms of being within striking distance all game.

    We will see this again vs. Beav/Ute and Coug.

    Ducks will do it diff. way by running it until we show we can stop it or choke on it.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EsophagealFeces
    EsophagealFeces Member Posts: 13,463
    godawgst said:

    UA used same mo as Beav/Cal/Texas did last year with great success in shortening game and limiting possessions.

    Joe made great point on POD and I was surprised when Wilcox fell behind 14-0 last week he/his OC said screw it we have to score fast and were snapping ball with 20 on play clock.

    UA fell behind by 14 and still stuck to their plan and it worked in terms of being within striking distance all game.

    We will see this again vs. Beav/Ute and Coug.

    Ducks will do it diff. way by running it until we show we can stop it or choke on it.

    I’m sure we’ll see it again, but that strategy is now 0-4 against us.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Joey
    Joey Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,619 Founders Club
    godawgst said:

    UA used same mo as Beav/Cal/Texas did last year with great success in shortening game and limiting possessions.

    Joe made great point on POD and I was surprised when Wilcox fell behind 14-0 last week he/his OC said screw it we have to score fast and were snapping ball with 20 on play clock.

    UA fell behind by 14 and still stuck to their plan and it worked in terms of being within striking distance all game.

    We will see this again vs. Beav/Ute and Coug.

    Ducks will do it diff. way by running it until we show we can stop it or choke on it.

    It works if your defense is built to do it and it is your general scheme. It’s not Oregons scheme. Believe it or not the Ducks are likely a better matchup for the Huskies than Arizona was
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dirtysouwfdawg
    dirtysouwfdawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,883 Swaye's Wigwam
    EsophagealFeces said:

    godawgst said:

    UA used same mo as Beav/Cal/Texas did last year with great success in shortening game and limiting possessions.

    Joe made great point on POD and I was surprised when Wilcox fell behind 14-0 last week he/his OC said screw it we have to score fast and were snapping ball with 20 on play clock.

    UA fell behind by 14 and still stuck to their plan and it worked in terms of being within striking distance all game.

    We will see this again vs. Beav/Ute and Coug.

    Ducks will do it diff. way by running it until we show we can stop it or choke on it.

    I’m sure we’ll see it again, but that strategy is now 0-4 against us.
    Yes though we also haven’t played anyone good using this strategy. Mistakes and 100+ yards of penalties against someone worth a damn who’s utilizing this strategy and we might be fucked.
    Whoregon will play their style and not let our style dictate them. U$c will want to get into a shootout. Beav/Ute, Coug… we’ll see.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter