Well, it is that time again.

Bendintheriver said:

"but this post has a lot of 2012 Mitt is electable in it."

Think about what you just said. The all in on Trump perspective has an awful lot of 2020 in it.

I respect everyone's opinion on this. If Trump is the guy in the end, he gets my vote, but other than The Bitch (who also learned the hard way), he is the most divisive presidential candidate in memory.

Fuck around with Trump's base turnout at your own peril. Many are not coming out to vote for Nikki and her bloodthirst for Ukraine. She is going to beat out Ron almost assuredly, as this board predicted.

WestlinnDuck said:

georgiaduck said:

Didn't vote for Trump in 2016- but I did in 2020. The difference in the two election cycles was results. If Trump could get away from disparaging other republicans and just speak to his record he would waltz to a second term. He's going to be the nominee so no sense in beating up folks who you'll need to campaign for you in 14 months.

I like Desantis- he kept Florida open during the pandemic, stood up to the woke and he's growing the population of his state by being tax friendly. I don't understand the vitriol other conservatives have for him just because he's not Trump. Desantis isn't going to run as a third party but I think Trump, would essentially handing the Oval Office to the dems for another four years.

It's ok to like both candidates- it doesn't mean you hate the other.

I don't think abortion is going to be the issue for 2024 when inflation is still high and the stock market is stagnant with fears of recession just around the corner. We don't have law and order in many of the biggest cities in the country, we're funding a proxy war with no end in sight and the current leadership is focused on having transvestites to the White House.

Trump needs to focus his attacks on Biden and that's it. Do this and Republicans have Presidency, the House, and a conservative based SC.

Your wrong on abortion as an issue for lots of white women who otherwise would be disposed to vote against a dem. For many of them its purely emotional and not a balanced support based on all the issues that effect Americans. A four month limit on abortion can be sold as a bipartisan compromise. The abortion in the ninth month dems is also a tough sell to a woman who has other concerns.

Stacy Abrams had nothing to run on in 2022 and focused only on abortion. She had all those votes locked up already and wasn't gaining anymore by running fear ads nonstop.

Trump is already backing himself away from heartbeat bills. His message to voters needs to be, we let the States decide, which is part of his overall message that we're not cramming Federal government down your throats. Back it up with pushing the FDC to approve more over the counter birth control. Then come out swinging that Biden wants it legal up to the moment of birth. It's time the Republicans took the offensive and made dems get on record about some issues.

Once he addresses abortion- move onto inflation which is going to hit those same white women but at a much higher percentage.

RaceBannon said:

There is a 60 year old woman in our office well past the age of abortion that still gets visibly mad talking about men telling women what to do with their body

It's just a thing

The midway approach is the electoral winner. 3-4 months. Not weeks and not up to birth

Personally I like the heartbeat approach because we know a lot more now that we knew in 1972. But I don't need the president to back or even think it should be law because it won't change minds. Quite the opposite it is used to show how mean old GOP men want to put ya all in chanins

That's why he needs to go with the statement of returning control back to the states. And then stay out of it. The dems brought this on with up to the "moment of birth" and the pendulum hit them in the face. No need to give it potential energy.

After the soundbite of less fed interference, remind voters that when he was in office companies were giving bonus checks and now its layoff notices