Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Should Garland be impeached?

2

Comments

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,168 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Blueduck said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    RoadTrip said:

    While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.

    It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.

    I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.

    I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.

    Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
    As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
    Agreed. Unlike so much of what Representative Meathead does, this should actually be looked into.
    Biden is toast

    This proves it
    LIPO

    If you lose the enduring love of HHusky you're out

    We've been waiting for the pivot
    I'll await the outcome. I see you won't.
    Waiting for the outcome is the pivot
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,168 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    It's up to the house

    To "pursue" it

    Beyond pressing

    Rove speak is back


    RDS agrees with what the House is doing.

    That’s the takeaway.

    Your guy punted Race.

    That’s his call if he’s not interested in really going at the “deep state.”
    Pressing

    Bigly
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    46XiJCAB said:

    It's up to the house

    To "pursue" it

    Beyond pressing

    Rove speak is back


    RDS agrees with what the House is doing.

    That’s the takeaway.

    Your guy punted Race.

    That’s his call if he’s not interested in really going at the “deep state.”
    Pressing

    Bigly
    Race with the go to surrender flag.

    It’s okay to say he should have said he agrees with the House.

    Deep State slayer my ass.

    Sucker.

    LOL….
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,168 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    It's up to the house

    To "pursue" it

    Beyond pressing

    Rove speak is back


    RDS agrees with what the House is doing.

    That’s the takeaway.

    Your guy punted Race.

    That’s his call if he’s not interested in really going at the “deep state.”
    Pressing

    Bigly
    Race with the go to surrender flag.

    It’s okay to say he should have said he agrees with the House.

    Deep State slayer my ass.

    Sucker.

    LOL….
    Sounds like a big issue
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    46XiJCAB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    It's up to the house

    To "pursue" it

    Beyond pressing

    Rove speak is back


    RDS agrees with what the House is doing.

    That’s the takeaway.

    Your guy punted Race.

    That’s his call if he’s not interested in really going at the “deep state.”
    Pressing

    Bigly
    Race with the go to surrender flag.

    It’s okay to say he should have said he agrees with the House.

    Deep State slayer my ass.

    Sucker.

    LOL….
    Sounds like a big issue
    No, just another example of Trump playing his “deep state” slayer suckers. Hey Race if you’re good with it that’s okay.

    I like the guy who wasn’t afraid to say the House was doing the right thing. Of course he’s also not indicted so….
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,514

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Blueduck said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    RoadTrip said:

    While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.

    It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.

    I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.

    I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.

    Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
    As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
    Agreed. Unlike so much of what Representative Meathead does, this should actually be looked into.
    Biden is toast

    This proves it
    LIPO

    If you lose the enduring love of HHusky you're out

    We've been waiting for the pivot
    I'll await the outcome. I see you won't.
    Waiting for the outcome is the pivot
    sure


    "pivot"

    Garland says get Weiss in for testimony; he can be asked for documents as well, of course. Promises no DOJ resistance. Pretty simple step to take unless you prefer to whine--which is likely.

    Start there and see where it goes.



  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,168 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Blueduck said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    RoadTrip said:

    While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.

    It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.

    I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.

    I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.

    Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
    As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
    Agreed. Unlike so much of what Representative Meathead does, this should actually be looked into.
    Biden is toast

    This proves it
    LIPO

    If you lose the enduring love of HHusky you're out

    We've been waiting for the pivot
    I'll await the outcome. I see you won't.
    Waiting for the outcome is the pivot
    sure


    "pivot"

    Garland says get Weiss in for testimony; he can be asked for documents as well, of course. Promises no DOJ resistance. Pretty simple step to take unless you prefer to whine--which is likely.

    Start there and see where it goes.



    So now you sound like Biden

    #dementia
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,168 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    It's up to the house

    To "pursue" it

    Beyond pressing

    Rove speak is back


    RDS agrees with what the House is doing.

    That’s the takeaway.

    Your guy punted Race.

    That’s his call if he’s not interested in really going at the “deep state.”
    Pressing

    Bigly
    Race with the go to surrender flag.

    It’s okay to say he should have said he agrees with the House.

    Deep State slayer my ass.

    Sucker.

    LOL….
    Sounds like a big issue
    No, just another example of Trump playing his “deep state” slayer suckers. Hey Race if you’re good with it that’s okay.

    I like the guy who wasn’t afraid to say the House was doing the right thing. Of course he’s also not indicted so….
    Indicted by the deep state versus tool of the deep state

    That's the primary election
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,514

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Blueduck said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    RoadTrip said:

    While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.

    It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.

    I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.

    I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.

    Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
    As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
    Agreed. Unlike so much of what Representative Meathead does, this should actually be looked into.
    Biden is toast

    This proves it
    LIPO

    If you lose the enduring love of HHusky you're out

    We've been waiting for the pivot
    I'll await the outcome. I see you won't.
    Waiting for the outcome is the pivot
    sure


    "pivot"

    Garland says get Weiss in for testimony; he can be asked for documents as well, of course. Promises no DOJ resistance. Pretty simple step to take unless you prefer to whine--which is likely.

    Start there and see where it goes.



    So now you sound like Biden

    #dementia
    so whine is your preference

    right again!
  • BlueduckBlueduck Member Posts: 1,394
    46XiJCAB said:

    Blueduck said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    RoadTrip said:

    While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.

    It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.

    I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.

    I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.

    Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
    Is it a bored wide concensus that "one had the correct response" or is that just your opinion?

    If I'm Trump its a no win question but Im going to defer to the appropriate channels to address this.
    I actually believe that is the smartest move for optics given the situation or else He's going to get dragged through the mud and crucified by MSM because he wants revenge against the man trying to ruin him and orange man verwy verwy bad!

    As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
    Good grief obviously it’s my opinion. And it’s correct. Trump rants about the deep state and when he has the chance to agree that Garland should be impeached, he shrinks.
    Ok, good, I was worried you were stating facts again.

    Maybe it's not the right time for Trump to be giving opinions on Bidens AG...But what do I know?

    Im sure you know what best for him
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,168 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Blueduck said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    RoadTrip said:

    While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.

    It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.

    I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.

    I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.

    Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
    As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
    Agreed. Unlike so much of what Representative Meathead does, this should actually be looked into.
    Biden is toast

    This proves it
    LIPO

    If you lose the enduring love of HHusky you're out

    We've been waiting for the pivot
    I'll await the outcome. I see you won't.
    Waiting for the outcome is the pivot
    sure


    "pivot"

    Garland says get Weiss in for testimony; he can be asked for documents as well, of course. Promises no DOJ resistance. Pretty simple step to take unless you prefer to whine--which is likely.

    Start there and see where it goes.



    So now you sound like Biden

    #dementia
    so whine is your preference

    right again!
    A nice Pinot Noir as a matter of fact
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,168 Founders Club
    Blueduck said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Blueduck said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    RoadTrip said:

    While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.

    It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.

    I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.

    I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.

    Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
    Is it a bored wide concensus that "one had the correct response" or is that just your opinion?

    If I'm Trump its a no win question but Im going to defer to the appropriate channels to address this.
    I actually believe that is the smartest move for optics given the situation or else He's going to get dragged through the mud and crucified by MSM because he wants revenge against the man trying to ruin him and orange man verwy verwy bad!

    As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
    Good grief obviously it’s my opinion. And it’s correct. Trump rants about the deep state and when he has the chance to agree that Garland should be impeached, he shrinks.
    Ok, good, I was worried you were stating facts again.

    Maybe it's not the right time for Trump to be giving opinions on Bidens AG...But what do I know?

    Im sure you know what best for him
    He be accused of obstruction of justice

    Again

    46 would fall for it

    Again
  • pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,371 Founders Club

    46XiJCAB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    It's up to the house

    To "pursue" it

    Beyond pressing

    Rove speak is back


    RDS agrees with what the House is doing.

    That’s the takeaway.

    Your guy punted Race.

    That’s his call if he’s not interested in really going at the “deep state.”
    Pressing

    Bigly
    Race with the go to surrender flag.

    It’s okay to say he should have said he agrees with the House.

    Deep State slayer my ass.

    Sucker.

    LOL….
    Sounds like a big issue
    No, just another example of Trump playing his “deep state” slayer suckers. Hey Race if you’re good with it that’s okay.

    I like the guy who wasn’t afraid to say the House was doing the right thing. Of course he’s also not indicted so….
    Indicted by the deep state versus tool of the deep state

    That's the primary election
    No surprise 46Quook is swallowing deep state the way HH swallows Biden.

  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    46XiJCAB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    It's up to the house

    To "pursue" it

    Beyond pressing

    Rove speak is back


    RDS agrees with what the House is doing.

    That’s the takeaway.

    Your guy punted Race.

    That’s his call if he’s not interested in really going at the “deep state.”
    Pressing

    Bigly
    Race with the go to surrender flag.

    It’s okay to say he should have said he agrees with the House.

    Deep State slayer my ass.

    Sucker.

    LOL….
    Sounds like a big issue
    No, just another example of Trump playing his “deep state” slayer suckers. Hey Race if you’re good with it that’s okay.

    I like the guy who wasn’t afraid to say the House was doing the right thing. Of course he’s also not indicted so….
    Indicted by the deep state versus tool of the deep state

    That's the primary election
    Sucker take.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    Blueduck said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Blueduck said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    RoadTrip said:

    While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.

    It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.

    I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.

    I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.

    Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
    Is it a bored wide concensus that "one had the correct response" or is that just your opinion?

    If I'm Trump its a no win question but Im going to defer to the appropriate channels to address this.
    I actually believe that is the smartest move for optics given the situation or else He's going to get dragged through the mud and crucified by MSM because he wants revenge against the man trying to ruin him and orange man verwy verwy bad!

    As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
    Good grief obviously it’s my opinion. And it’s correct. Trump rants about the deep state and when he has the chance to agree that Garland should be impeached, he shrinks.
    Ok, good, I was worried you were stating facts again.

    Maybe it's not the right time for Trump to be giving opinions on Bidens AG...But what do I know?

    Im sure you know what best for him
    I state facts with numbers and quotes.

    Or maybe he’s just BSing all of you about getting the “deep state” which is much more likely given his track record of BS.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    pawz said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    It's up to the house

    To "pursue" it

    Beyond pressing

    Rove speak is back


    RDS agrees with what the House is doing.

    That’s the takeaway.

    Your guy punted Race.

    That’s his call if he’s not interested in really going at the “deep state.”
    Pressing

    Bigly
    Race with the go to surrender flag.

    It’s okay to say he should have said he agrees with the House.

    Deep State slayer my ass.

    Sucker.

    LOL….
    Sounds like a big issue
    No, just another example of Trump playing his “deep state” slayer suckers. Hey Race if you’re good with it that’s okay.

    I like the guy who wasn’t afraid to say the House was doing the right thing. Of course he’s also not indicted so….
    Indicted by the deep state versus tool of the deep state

    That's the primary election
    No surprise 46Quook is swallowing deep state the way HH swallows Biden.

    A lot of swallowing talk by you Pawz.

    Is there anything you would like to share with the bored?
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,168 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    It's up to the house

    To "pursue" it

    Beyond pressing

    Rove speak is back


    RDS agrees with what the House is doing.

    That’s the takeaway.

    Your guy punted Race.

    That’s his call if he’s not interested in really going at the “deep state.”
    Pressing

    Bigly
    Race with the go to surrender flag.

    It’s okay to say he should have said he agrees with the House.

    Deep State slayer my ass.

    Sucker.

    LOL….
    Sounds like a big issue
    No, just another example of Trump playing his “deep state” slayer suckers. Hey Race if you’re good with it that’s okay.

    I like the guy who wasn’t afraid to say the House was doing the right thing. Of course he’s also not indicted so….
    Indicted by the deep state versus tool of the deep state

    That's the primary election
    Sucker take.
    You're not the only one that fell for Ron

    The Jeb endorsement was the tell

    I won't call you a sucker though

    Just easily fooled
  • BlueduckBlueduck Member Posts: 1,394
    46XiJCAB said:

    Blueduck said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Blueduck said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    RoadTrip said:

    While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.

    It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.

    I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.

    I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.

    Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
    Is it a bored wide concensus that "one had the correct response" or is that just your opinion?

    If I'm Trump its a no win question but Im going to defer to the appropriate channels to address this.
    I actually believe that is the smartest move for optics given the situation or else He's going to get dragged through the mud and crucified by MSM because he wants revenge against the man trying to ruin him and orange man verwy verwy bad!

    As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
    Good grief obviously it’s my opinion. And it’s correct. Trump rants about the deep state and when he has the chance to agree that Garland should be impeached, he shrinks.
    Ok, good, I was worried you were stating facts again.

    Maybe it's not the right time for Trump to be giving opinions on Bidens AG...But what do I know?

    Im sure you know what best for him
    I state facts with numbers and quotes.

    Or maybe he’s just BSing all of you about getting the “deep state” which is much more likely given his track record of BS.
    You just tried to state a fact and then followed it with a hypothetical and an assumption.

  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    46XiJCAB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    It's up to the house

    To "pursue" it

    Beyond pressing

    Rove speak is back


    RDS agrees with what the House is doing.

    That’s the takeaway.

    Your guy punted Race.

    That’s his call if he’s not interested in really going at the “deep state.”
    Pressing

    Bigly
    Race with the go to surrender flag.

    It’s okay to say he should have said he agrees with the House.

    Deep State slayer my ass.

    Sucker.

    LOL….
    Sounds like a big issue
    No, just another example of Trump playing his “deep state” slayer suckers. Hey Race if you’re good with it that’s okay.

    I like the guy who wasn’t afraid to say the House was doing the right thing. Of course he’s also not indicted so….
    Indicted by the deep state versus tool of the deep state

    That's the primary election
    Sucker take.
    You're not the only one that fell for Ron

    The Jeb endorsement was the tell

    I won't call you a sucker though

    Just easily fooled
    Almost funny coming from a Trump supporter.

    He’s always the victim.

    It’s a gift.
  • pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,371 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    It's up to the house

    To "pursue" it

    Beyond pressing

    Rove speak is back


    RDS agrees with what the House is doing.

    That’s the takeaway.

    Your guy punted Race.

    That’s his call if he’s not interested in really going at the “deep state.”
    Pressing

    Bigly
    Race with the go to surrender flag.

    It’s okay to say he should have said he agrees with the House.

    Deep State slayer my ass.

    Sucker.

    LOL….
    Sounds like a big issue
    No, just another example of Trump playing his “deep state” slayer suckers. Hey Race if you’re good with it that’s okay.

    I like the guy who wasn’t afraid to say the House was doing the right thing. Of course he’s also not indicted so….
    Indicted by the deep state versus tool of the deep state

    That's the primary election
    Sucker take.
    You're not the only one that fell for Ron

    The Jeb endorsement was the tell

    I won't call you a sucker though

    Just easily fooled
    Almost funny coming from a Trump supporter.

    He’s always the victim.

    It’s a gift.
    What’s your gift?

    Zero-to-meltdown 3.5 seconds?

Sign In or Register to comment.