Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Should Garland be impeached?
Comments
-
A nice Pinot Noir as a matter of factHHusky said:
so whine is your preferenceRaceBannon said:
So now you sound like BidenHHusky said:
sureRaceBannon said:
Waiting for the outcome is the pivotHHusky said:
I'll await the outcome. I see you won't.RaceBannon said:
If you lose the enduring love of HHusky you're outHHusky said:
LIPORaceBannon said:
Biden is toastHHusky said:
Agreed. Unlike so much of what Representative Meathead does, this should actually be looked into.Blueduck said:
As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.46XiJCAB said:
It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.RoadTrip said:While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.
I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.
I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.
Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
This proves it
We've been waiting for the pivot
"pivot"
Garland says get Weiss in for testimony; he can be asked for documents as well, of course. Promises no DOJ resistance. Pretty simple step to take unless you prefer to whine--which is likely.
Start there and see where it goes.
#dementia
right again! -
He be accused of obstruction of justiceBlueduck said:
Ok, good, I was worried you were stating facts again.46XiJCAB said:
Good grief obviously it’s my opinion. And it’s correct. Trump rants about the deep state and when he has the chance to agree that Garland should be impeached, he shrinks.Blueduck said:
Is it a bored wide concensus that "one had the correct response" or is that just your opinion?46XiJCAB said:
It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.RoadTrip said:While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.
I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.
I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.
Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
If I'm Trump its a no win question but Im going to defer to the appropriate channels to address this.
I actually believe that is the smartest move for optics given the situation or else He's going to get dragged through the mud and crucified by MSM because he wants revenge against the man trying to ruin him and orange man verwy verwy bad!
As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
Maybe it's not the right time for Trump to be giving opinions on Bidens AG...But what do I know?
Im sure you know what best for him
Again
46 would fall for it
Again -
No surprise 46Quook is swallowing deep state the way HH swallows Biden.RaceBannon said:
Indicted by the deep state versus tool of the deep state46XiJCAB said:
No, just another example of Trump playing his “deep state” slayer suckers. Hey Race if you’re good with it that’s okay.RaceBannon said:
Sounds like a big issue46XiJCAB said:
Race with the go to surrender flag.RaceBannon said:
Pressing46XiJCAB said:RaceBannon said:It's up to the house
To "pursue" it
Beyond pressing
Rove speak is back
RDS agrees with what the House is doing.
That’s the takeaway.
Your guy punted Race.
That’s his call if he’s not interested in really going at the “deep state.”
Bigly
It’s okay to say he should have said he agrees with the House.
Deep State slayer my ass.
Sucker.
LOL….
I like the guy who wasn’t afraid to say the House was doing the right thing. Of course he’s also not indicted so….
That's the primary election
-
Sucker take.RaceBannon said:
Indicted by the deep state versus tool of the deep state46XiJCAB said:
No, just another example of Trump playing his “deep state” slayer suckers. Hey Race if you’re good with it that’s okay.RaceBannon said:
Sounds like a big issue46XiJCAB said:
Race with the go to surrender flag.RaceBannon said:
Pressing46XiJCAB said:RaceBannon said:It's up to the house
To "pursue" it
Beyond pressing
Rove speak is back
RDS agrees with what the House is doing.
That’s the takeaway.
Your guy punted Race.
That’s his call if he’s not interested in really going at the “deep state.”
Bigly
It’s okay to say he should have said he agrees with the House.
Deep State slayer my ass.
Sucker.
LOL….
I like the guy who wasn’t afraid to say the House was doing the right thing. Of course he’s also not indicted so….
That's the primary election -
I state facts with numbers and quotes.Blueduck said:
Ok, good, I was worried you were stating facts again.46XiJCAB said:
Good grief obviously it’s my opinion. And it’s correct. Trump rants about the deep state and when he has the chance to agree that Garland should be impeached, he shrinks.Blueduck said:
Is it a bored wide concensus that "one had the correct response" or is that just your opinion?46XiJCAB said:
It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.RoadTrip said:While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.
I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.
I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.
Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
If I'm Trump its a no win question but Im going to defer to the appropriate channels to address this.
I actually believe that is the smartest move for optics given the situation or else He's going to get dragged through the mud and crucified by MSM because he wants revenge against the man trying to ruin him and orange man verwy verwy bad!
As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
Maybe it's not the right time for Trump to be giving opinions on Bidens AG...But what do I know?
Im sure you know what best for him
Or maybe he’s just BSing all of you about getting the “deep state” which is much more likely given his track record of BS. -
A lot of swallowing talk by you Pawz.pawz said:
No surprise 46Quook is swallowing deep state the way HH swallows Biden.RaceBannon said:
Indicted by the deep state versus tool of the deep state46XiJCAB said:
No, just another example of Trump playing his “deep state” slayer suckers. Hey Race if you’re good with it that’s okay.RaceBannon said:
Sounds like a big issue46XiJCAB said:
Race with the go to surrender flag.RaceBannon said:
Pressing46XiJCAB said:RaceBannon said:It's up to the house
To "pursue" it
Beyond pressing
Rove speak is back
RDS agrees with what the House is doing.
That’s the takeaway.
Your guy punted Race.
That’s his call if he’s not interested in really going at the “deep state.”
Bigly
It’s okay to say he should have said he agrees with the House.
Deep State slayer my ass.
Sucker.
LOL….
I like the guy who wasn’t afraid to say the House was doing the right thing. Of course he’s also not indicted so….
That's the primary election
Is there anything you would like to share with the bored? -
You're not the only one that fell for Ron46XiJCAB said:
Sucker take.RaceBannon said:
Indicted by the deep state versus tool of the deep state46XiJCAB said:
No, just another example of Trump playing his “deep state” slayer suckers. Hey Race if you’re good with it that’s okay.RaceBannon said:
Sounds like a big issue46XiJCAB said:
Race with the go to surrender flag.RaceBannon said:
Pressing46XiJCAB said:RaceBannon said:It's up to the house
To "pursue" it
Beyond pressing
Rove speak is back
RDS agrees with what the House is doing.
That’s the takeaway.
Your guy punted Race.
That’s his call if he’s not interested in really going at the “deep state.”
Bigly
It’s okay to say he should have said he agrees with the House.
Deep State slayer my ass.
Sucker.
LOL….
I like the guy who wasn’t afraid to say the House was doing the right thing. Of course he’s also not indicted so….
That's the primary election
The Jeb endorsement was the tell
I won't call you a sucker though
Just easily fooled -
You just tried to state a fact and then followed it with a hypothetical and an assumption.46XiJCAB said:
I state facts with numbers and quotes.Blueduck said:
Ok, good, I was worried you were stating facts again.46XiJCAB said:
Good grief obviously it’s my opinion. And it’s correct. Trump rants about the deep state and when he has the chance to agree that Garland should be impeached, he shrinks.Blueduck said:
Is it a bored wide concensus that "one had the correct response" or is that just your opinion?46XiJCAB said:
It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.RoadTrip said:While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.
I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.
I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.
Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
If I'm Trump its a no win question but Im going to defer to the appropriate channels to address this.
I actually believe that is the smartest move for optics given the situation or else He's going to get dragged through the mud and crucified by MSM because he wants revenge against the man trying to ruin him and orange man verwy verwy bad!
As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
Maybe it's not the right time for Trump to be giving opinions on Bidens AG...But what do I know?
Im sure you know what best for him
Or maybe he’s just BSing all of you about getting the “deep state” which is much more likely given his track record of BS.
-
Almost funny coming from a Trump supporter.RaceBannon said:
You're not the only one that fell for Ron46XiJCAB said:
Sucker take.RaceBannon said:
Indicted by the deep state versus tool of the deep state46XiJCAB said:
No, just another example of Trump playing his “deep state” slayer suckers. Hey Race if you’re good with it that’s okay.RaceBannon said:
Sounds like a big issue46XiJCAB said:
Race with the go to surrender flag.RaceBannon said:
Pressing46XiJCAB said:RaceBannon said:It's up to the house
To "pursue" it
Beyond pressing
Rove speak is back
RDS agrees with what the House is doing.
That’s the takeaway.
Your guy punted Race.
That’s his call if he’s not interested in really going at the “deep state.”
Bigly
It’s okay to say he should have said he agrees with the House.
Deep State slayer my ass.
Sucker.
LOL….
I like the guy who wasn’t afraid to say the House was doing the right thing. Of course he’s also not indicted so….
That's the primary election
The Jeb endorsement was the tell
I won't call you a sucker though
Just easily fooled
He’s always the victim.
It’s a gift. -
What’s your gift?46XiJCAB said:
Almost funny coming from a Trump supporter.RaceBannon said:
You're not the only one that fell for Ron46XiJCAB said:
Sucker take.RaceBannon said:
Indicted by the deep state versus tool of the deep state46XiJCAB said:
No, just another example of Trump playing his “deep state” slayer suckers. Hey Race if you’re good with it that’s okay.RaceBannon said:
Sounds like a big issue46XiJCAB said:
Race with the go to surrender flag.RaceBannon said:
Pressing46XiJCAB said:RaceBannon said:It's up to the house
To "pursue" it
Beyond pressing
Rove speak is back
RDS agrees with what the House is doing.
That’s the takeaway.
Your guy punted Race.
That’s his call if he’s not interested in really going at the “deep state.”
Bigly
It’s okay to say he should have said he agrees with the House.
Deep State slayer my ass.
Sucker.
LOL….
I like the guy who wasn’t afraid to say the House was doing the right thing. Of course he’s also not indicted so….
That's the primary election
The Jeb endorsement was the tell
I won't call you a sucker though
Just easily fooled
He’s always the victim.
It’s a gift.
Zero-to-meltdown 3.5 seconds?
-
Let me type this more s-l-o-w-l-y.Blueduck said:
You just tried to state a fact and then followed it with a hypothetical and an assumption.46XiJCAB said:
I state facts with numbers and quotes.Blueduck said:
Ok, good, I was worried you were stating facts again.46XiJCAB said:
Good grief obviously it’s my opinion. And it’s correct. Trump rants about the deep state and when he has the chance to agree that Garland should be impeached, he shrinks.Blueduck said:
Is it a bored wide concensus that "one had the correct response" or is that just your opinion?46XiJCAB said:
It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.RoadTrip said:While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.
I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.
I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.
Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
If I'm Trump its a no win question but Im going to defer to the appropriate channels to address this.
I actually believe that is the smartest move for optics given the situation or else He's going to get dragged through the mud and crucified by MSM because he wants revenge against the man trying to ruin him and orange man verwy verwy bad!
As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
Maybe it's not the right time for Trump to be giving opinions on Bidens AG...But what do I know?
Im sure you know what best for him
Or maybe he’s just BSing all of you about getting the “deep state” which is much more likely given his track record of BS.
I use numbers and quotes.
I share my opinions.
Trump is a bullshitter. Undeniable Fact.
He he was BSing his supporters about getting the DS in 2016. Zero evidence his first 4 years. Fact.
But hey give him another 4-5 years if we’re unfortunate enough to have him elected.
He may be the deep state slayer Trump supporters believe he will be. I doubt he even cares. Opinion.
-
Please don't.46XiJCAB said:
I share my opinions.Blueduck said:
You just tried to state a fact and then followed it with a hypothetical and an assumption.46XiJCAB said:
I state facts with numbers and quotes.Blueduck said:
Ok, good, I was worried you were stating facts again.46XiJCAB said:
Good grief obviously it’s my opinion. And it’s correct. Trump rants about the deep state and when he has the chance to agree that Garland should be impeached, he shrinks.Blueduck said:
Is it a bored wide concensus that "one had the correct response" or is that just your opinion?46XiJCAB said:
It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.RoadTrip said:While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.
I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.
I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.
Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
If I'm Trump its a no win question but Im going to defer to the appropriate channels to address this.
I actually believe that is the smartest move for optics given the situation or else He's going to get dragged through the mud and crucified by MSM because he wants revenge against the man trying to ruin him and orange man verwy verwy bad!
As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
Maybe it's not the right time for Trump to be giving opinions on Bidens AG...But what do I know?
Im sure you know what best for him
Or maybe he’s just BSing all of you about getting the “deep state” which is much more likely given his track record of BS. -
Talking to the mirror again.
-
Sometimes you shou46XiJCAB said:
I state facts with numbers and quotes.Blueduck said:
Ok, good, I was worried you were stating facts again.46XiJCAB said:
Good grief obviously it’s my opinion. And it’s correct. Trump rants about the deep state and when he has the chance to agree that Garland should be impeached, he shrinks.Blueduck said:
Is it a bored wide concensus that "one had the correct response" or is that just your opinion?46XiJCAB said:
It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.RoadTrip said:While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.
I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.
I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.
Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
If I'm Trump its a no win question but Im going to defer to the appropriate channels to address this.
I actually believe that is the smartest move for optics given the situation or else He's going to get dragged through the mud and crucified by MSM because he wants revenge against the man trying to ruin him and orange man verwy verwy bad!
As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
Maybe it's not the right time for Trump to be giving opinions on Bidens AG...But what do I know?
Im sure you know what best for him
Or maybe he’s just BSing all of you about getting the “deep state” which is much more likely given his track record of BS.
It doesn't matter how slow you type, your opinions do not magically become fact but it might help you separate facts from opinions if you slow down.46XiJCAB said:
Let me type this more s-l-o-w-l-y.Blueduck said:
You just tried to state a fact and then followed it with a hypothetical and an assumption.46XiJCAB said:
I state facts with numbers and quotes.Blueduck said:
Ok, good, I was worried you were stating facts again.46XiJCAB said:
Good grief obviously it’s my opinion. And it’s correct. Trump rants about the deep state and when he has the chance to agree that Garland should be impeached, he shrinks.Blueduck said:
Is it a bored wide concensus that "one had the correct response" or is that just your opinion?46XiJCAB said:
It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.RoadTrip said:While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.
I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.
I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.
Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
If I'm Trump its a no win question but Im going to defer to the appropriate channels to address this.
I actually believe that is the smartest move for optics given the situation or else He's going to get dragged through the mud and crucified by MSM because he wants revenge against the man trying to ruin him and orange man verwy verwy bad!
As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
Maybe it's not the right time for Trump to be giving opinions on Bidens AG...But what do I know?
Im sure you know what best for him
Or maybe he’s just BSing all of you about getting the “deep state” which is much more likely given his track record of BS.
I use numbers and quotes.
I share my opinions.
Trump is a bullshitter. Undeniable Fact.
He he was BSing his supporters about getting the DS in 2016. Zero evidence his first 4 years. Fact.
But hey give him another 4-5 years if we’re unfortunate enough to have him elected.
He may be the deep state slayer Trump supporters believe he will be. I doubt he even cares. Opinion.
Yes, sometimes you sprinkle numbers and quotes in with your opinions and assumptions and hyperbole and sometimes you state facts too.
-
Don’t read my poasts if you find them confusing. IDGAF.Blueduck said:
Sometimes you shou46XiJCAB said:
I state facts with numbers and quotes.Blueduck said:
Ok, good, I was worried you were stating facts again.46XiJCAB said:
Good grief obviously it’s my opinion. And it’s correct. Trump rants about the deep state and when he has the chance to agree that Garland should be impeached, he shrinks.Blueduck said:
Is it a bored wide concensus that "one had the correct response" or is that just your opinion?46XiJCAB said:
It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.RoadTrip said:While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.
I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.
I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.
Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
If I'm Trump its a no win question but Im going to defer to the appropriate channels to address this.
I actually believe that is the smartest move for optics given the situation or else He's going to get dragged through the mud and crucified by MSM because he wants revenge against the man trying to ruin him and orange man verwy verwy bad!
As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
Maybe it's not the right time for Trump to be giving opinions on Bidens AG...But what do I know?
Im sure you know what best for him
Or maybe he’s just BSing all of you about getting the “deep state” which is much more likely given his track record of BS.
It doesn't matter how slow you type, your opinions do not magically become fact but it might help you separate facts from opinions if you slow down.46XiJCAB said:
Let me type this more s-l-o-w-l-y.Blueduck said:
You just tried to state a fact and then followed it with a hypothetical and an assumption.46XiJCAB said:
I state facts with numbers and quotes.Blueduck said:
Ok, good, I was worried you were stating facts again.46XiJCAB said:
Good grief obviously it’s my opinion. And it’s correct. Trump rants about the deep state and when he has the chance to agree that Garland should be impeached, he shrinks.Blueduck said:
Is it a bored wide concensus that "one had the correct response" or is that just your opinion?46XiJCAB said:
It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.RoadTrip said:While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.
I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.
I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.
Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
If I'm Trump its a no win question but Im going to defer to the appropriate channels to address this.
I actually believe that is the smartest move for optics given the situation or else He's going to get dragged through the mud and crucified by MSM because he wants revenge against the man trying to ruin him and orange man verwy verwy bad!
As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
Maybe it's not the right time for Trump to be giving opinions on Bidens AG...But what do I know?
Im sure you know what best for him
Or maybe he’s just BSing all of you about getting the “deep state” which is much more likely given his track record of BS.
I use numbers and quotes.
I share my opinions.
Trump is a bullshitter. Undeniable Fact.
He he was BSing his supporters about getting the DS in 2016. Zero evidence his first 4 years. Fact.
But hey give him another 4-5 years if we’re unfortunate enough to have him elected.
He may be the deep state slayer Trump supporters believe he will be. I doubt he even cares. Opinion.
Yes, sometimes you sprinkle numbers and quotes in with your opinions and assumptions and hyperbole and sometimes you state facts too. -
Disagree.46XiJCAB said:
Don’t read my poasts if you find them confusing. IDGAF.Blueduck said:
Sometimes you shou46XiJCAB said:
I state facts with numbers and quotes.Blueduck said:
Ok, good, I was worried you were stating facts again.46XiJCAB said:
Good grief obviously it’s my opinion. And it’s correct. Trump rants about the deep state and when he has the chance to agree that Garland should be impeached, he shrinks.Blueduck said:
Is it a bored wide concensus that "one had the correct response" or is that just your opinion?46XiJCAB said:
It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.RoadTrip said:While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.
I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.
I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.
Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
If I'm Trump its a no win question but Im going to defer to the appropriate channels to address this.
I actually believe that is the smartest move for optics given the situation or else He's going to get dragged through the mud and crucified by MSM because he wants revenge against the man trying to ruin him and orange man verwy verwy bad!
As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
Maybe it's not the right time for Trump to be giving opinions on Bidens AG...But what do I know?
Im sure you know what best for him
Or maybe he’s just BSing all of you about getting the “deep state” which is much more likely given his track record of BS.
It doesn't matter how slow you type, your opinions do not magically become fact but it might help you separate facts from opinions if you slow down.46XiJCAB said:
Let me type this more s-l-o-w-l-y.Blueduck said:
You just tried to state a fact and then followed it with a hypothetical and an assumption.46XiJCAB said:
I state facts with numbers and quotes.Blueduck said:
Ok, good, I was worried you were stating facts again.46XiJCAB said:
Good grief obviously it’s my opinion. And it’s correct. Trump rants about the deep state and when he has the chance to agree that Garland should be impeached, he shrinks.Blueduck said:
Is it a bored wide concensus that "one had the correct response" or is that just your opinion?46XiJCAB said:
It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.RoadTrip said:While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.
I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.
I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.
Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
If I'm Trump its a no win question but Im going to defer to the appropriate channels to address this.
I actually believe that is the smartest move for optics given the situation or else He's going to get dragged through the mud and crucified by MSM because he wants revenge against the man trying to ruin him and orange man verwy verwy bad!
As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
Maybe it's not the right time for Trump to be giving opinions on Bidens AG...But what do I know?
Im sure you know what best for him
Or maybe he’s just BSing all of you about getting the “deep state” which is much more likely given his track record of BS.
I use numbers and quotes.
I share my opinions.
Trump is a bullshitter. Undeniable Fact.
He he was BSing his supporters about getting the DS in 2016. Zero evidence his first 4 years. Fact.
But hey give him another 4-5 years if we’re unfortunate enough to have him elected.
He may be the deep state slayer Trump supporters believe he will be. I doubt he even cares. Opinion.
Yes, sometimes you sprinkle numbers and quotes in with your opinions and assumptions and hyperbole and sometimes you state facts too.
It seems like quite the opposite frankly.
Maybe a walk on the beach for perspective is in order.
-
Says my stalker.pawz said:
Disagree.46XiJCAB said:
Don’t read my poasts if you find them confusing. IDGAF.Blueduck said:
Sometimes you shou46XiJCAB said:
I state facts with numbers and quotes.Blueduck said:
Ok, good, I was worried you were stating facts again.46XiJCAB said:
Good grief obviously it’s my opinion. And it’s correct. Trump rants about the deep state and when he has the chance to agree that Garland should be impeached, he shrinks.Blueduck said:
Is it a bored wide concensus that "one had the correct response" or is that just your opinion?46XiJCAB said:
It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.RoadTrip said:While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.
I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.
I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.
Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
If I'm Trump its a no win question but Im going to defer to the appropriate channels to address this.
I actually believe that is the smartest move for optics given the situation or else He's going to get dragged through the mud and crucified by MSM because he wants revenge against the man trying to ruin him and orange man verwy verwy bad!
As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
Maybe it's not the right time for Trump to be giving opinions on Bidens AG...But what do I know?
Im sure you know what best for him
Or maybe he’s just BSing all of you about getting the “deep state” which is much more likely given his track record of BS.
It doesn't matter how slow you type, your opinions do not magically become fact but it might help you separate facts from opinions if you slow down.46XiJCAB said:
Let me type this more s-l-o-w-l-y.Blueduck said:
You just tried to state a fact and then followed it with a hypothetical and an assumption.46XiJCAB said:
I state facts with numbers and quotes.Blueduck said:
Ok, good, I was worried you were stating facts again.46XiJCAB said:
Good grief obviously it’s my opinion. And it’s correct. Trump rants about the deep state and when he has the chance to agree that Garland should be impeached, he shrinks.Blueduck said:
Is it a bored wide concensus that "one had the correct response" or is that just your opinion?46XiJCAB said:
It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.RoadTrip said:While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.
I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.
I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.
Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
If I'm Trump its a no win question but Im going to defer to the appropriate channels to address this.
I actually believe that is the smartest move for optics given the situation or else He's going to get dragged through the mud and crucified by MSM because he wants revenge against the man trying to ruin him and orange man verwy verwy bad!
As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
Maybe it's not the right time for Trump to be giving opinions on Bidens AG...But what do I know?
Im sure you know what best for him
Or maybe he’s just BSing all of you about getting the “deep state” which is much more likely given his track record of BS.
I use numbers and quotes.
I share my opinions.
Trump is a bullshitter. Undeniable Fact.
He he was BSing his supporters about getting the DS in 2016. Zero evidence his first 4 years. Fact.
But hey give him another 4-5 years if we’re unfortunate enough to have him elected.
He may be the deep state slayer Trump supporters believe he will be. I doubt he even cares. Opinion.
Yes, sometimes you sprinkle numbers and quotes in with your opinions and assumptions and hyperbole and sometimes you state facts too.
It seems like quite the opposite frankly.
Maybe a walk on the beach for perspective is in order.
You need a new outpitch. -
Things 13 year old girls say.46XiJCAB said:
Says my stalker.pawz said:
Disagree.46XiJCAB said:
Don’t read my poasts if you find them confusing. IDGAF.Blueduck said:
Sometimes you shou46XiJCAB said:
I state facts with numbers and quotes.Blueduck said:
Ok, good, I was worried you were stating facts again.46XiJCAB said:
Good grief obviously it’s my opinion. And it’s correct. Trump rants about the deep state and when he has the chance to agree that Garland should be impeached, he shrinks.Blueduck said:
Is it a bored wide concensus that "one had the correct response" or is that just your opinion?46XiJCAB said:
It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.RoadTrip said:While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.
I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.
I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.
Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
If I'm Trump its a no win question but Im going to defer to the appropriate channels to address this.
I actually believe that is the smartest move for optics given the situation or else He's going to get dragged through the mud and crucified by MSM because he wants revenge against the man trying to ruin him and orange man verwy verwy bad!
As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
Maybe it's not the right time for Trump to be giving opinions on Bidens AG...But what do I know?
Im sure you know what best for him
Or maybe he’s just BSing all of you about getting the “deep state” which is much more likely given his track record of BS.
It doesn't matter how slow you type, your opinions do not magically become fact but it might help you separate facts from opinions if you slow down.46XiJCAB said:
Let me type this more s-l-o-w-l-y.Blueduck said:
You just tried to state a fact and then followed it with a hypothetical and an assumption.46XiJCAB said:
I state facts with numbers and quotes.Blueduck said:
Ok, good, I was worried you were stating facts again.46XiJCAB said:
Good grief obviously it’s my opinion. And it’s correct. Trump rants about the deep state and when he has the chance to agree that Garland should be impeached, he shrinks.Blueduck said:
Is it a bored wide concensus that "one had the correct response" or is that just your opinion?46XiJCAB said:
It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.RoadTrip said:While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.
I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.
I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.
Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
If I'm Trump its a no win question but Im going to defer to the appropriate channels to address this.
I actually believe that is the smartest move for optics given the situation or else He's going to get dragged through the mud and crucified by MSM because he wants revenge against the man trying to ruin him and orange man verwy verwy bad!
As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
Maybe it's not the right time for Trump to be giving opinions on Bidens AG...But what do I know?
Im sure you know what best for him
Or maybe he’s just BSing all of you about getting the “deep state” which is much more likely given his track record of BS.
I use numbers and quotes.
I share my opinions.
Trump is a bullshitter. Undeniable Fact.
He he was BSing his supporters about getting the DS in 2016. Zero evidence his first 4 years. Fact.
But hey give him another 4-5 years if we’re unfortunate enough to have him elected.
He may be the deep state slayer Trump supporters believe he will be. I doubt he even cares. Opinion.
Yes, sometimes you sprinkle numbers and quotes in with your opinions and assumptions and hyperbole and sometimes you state facts too.
It seems like quite the opposite frankly.
Maybe a walk on the beach for perspective is in order.
You need a new outpitch.
You are far too emotional (for politics).
It’s no one’s fault but your, Liz.
Grow a pair.
-
My stalker says I’m too emotional.pawz said:
Things 13 year old girls say.46XiJCAB said:
Says my stalker.pawz said:
Disagree.46XiJCAB said:
Don’t read my poasts if you find them confusing. IDGAF.Blueduck said:
Sometimes you shou46XiJCAB said:
I state facts with numbers and quotes.Blueduck said:
Ok, good, I was worried you were stating facts again.46XiJCAB said:
Good grief obviously it’s my opinion. And it’s correct. Trump rants about the deep state and when he has the chance to agree that Garland should be impeached, he shrinks.Blueduck said:
Is it a bored wide concensus that "one had the correct response" or is that just your opinion?46XiJCAB said:
It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.RoadTrip said:While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.
I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.
I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.
Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
If I'm Trump its a no win question but Im going to defer to the appropriate channels to address this.
I actually believe that is the smartest move for optics given the situation or else He's going to get dragged through the mud and crucified by MSM because he wants revenge against the man trying to ruin him and orange man verwy verwy bad!
As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
Maybe it's not the right time for Trump to be giving opinions on Bidens AG...But what do I know?
Im sure you know what best for him
Or maybe he’s just BSing all of you about getting the “deep state” which is much more likely given his track record of BS.
It doesn't matter how slow you type, your opinions do not magically become fact but it might help you separate facts from opinions if you slow down.46XiJCAB said:
Let me type this more s-l-o-w-l-y.Blueduck said:
You just tried to state a fact and then followed it with a hypothetical and an assumption.46XiJCAB said:
I state facts with numbers and quotes.Blueduck said:
Ok, good, I was worried you were stating facts again.46XiJCAB said:
Good grief obviously it’s my opinion. And it’s correct. Trump rants about the deep state and when he has the chance to agree that Garland should be impeached, he shrinks.Blueduck said:
Is it a bored wide concensus that "one had the correct response" or is that just your opinion?46XiJCAB said:
It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.RoadTrip said:While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.
I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.
I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.
Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
If I'm Trump its a no win question but Im going to defer to the appropriate channels to address this.
I actually believe that is the smartest move for optics given the situation or else He's going to get dragged through the mud and crucified by MSM because he wants revenge against the man trying to ruin him and orange man verwy verwy bad!
As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
Maybe it's not the right time for Trump to be giving opinions on Bidens AG...But what do I know?
Im sure you know what best for him
Or maybe he’s just BSing all of you about getting the “deep state” which is much more likely given his track record of BS.
I use numbers and quotes.
I share my opinions.
Trump is a bullshitter. Undeniable Fact.
He he was BSing his supporters about getting the DS in 2016. Zero evidence his first 4 years. Fact.
But hey give him another 4-5 years if we’re unfortunate enough to have him elected.
He may be the deep state slayer Trump supporters believe he will be. I doubt he even cares. Opinion.
Yes, sometimes you sprinkle numbers and quotes in with your opinions and assumptions and hyperbole and sometimes you state facts too.
It seems like quite the opposite frankly.
Maybe a walk on the beach for perspective is in order.
You need a new outpitch.
You are far too emotional (for politics).
It’s no one’s fault but your, Liz.
Grow a pair.
I chortled. -
Do victims of stalking habitually spend almost every waking hour at the scene of the crime? One might say they are looking for abuse.46XiJCAB said:
My stalker says I’m too emotional.pawz said:
Things 13 year old girls say.46XiJCAB said:
Says my stalker.pawz said:
Disagree.46XiJCAB said:
Don’t read my poasts if you find them confusing. IDGAF.Blueduck said:
Sometimes you shou46XiJCAB said:
I state facts with numbers and quotes.Blueduck said:
Ok, good, I was worried you were stating facts again.46XiJCAB said:
Good grief obviously it’s my opinion. And it’s correct. Trump rants about the deep state and when he has the chance to agree that Garland should be impeached, he shrinks.Blueduck said:
Is it a bored wide concensus that "one had the correct response" or is that just your opinion?46XiJCAB said:
It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.RoadTrip said:While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.
I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.
I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.
Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
If I'm Trump its a no win question but Im going to defer to the appropriate channels to address this.
I actually believe that is the smartest move for optics given the situation or else He's going to get dragged through the mud and crucified by MSM because he wants revenge against the man trying to ruin him and orange man verwy verwy bad!
As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
Maybe it's not the right time for Trump to be giving opinions on Bidens AG...But what do I know?
Im sure you know what best for him
Or maybe he’s just BSing all of you about getting the “deep state” which is much more likely given his track record of BS.
It doesn't matter how slow you type, your opinions do not magically become fact but it might help you separate facts from opinions if you slow down.46XiJCAB said:
Let me type this more s-l-o-w-l-y.Blueduck said:
You just tried to state a fact and then followed it with a hypothetical and an assumption.46XiJCAB said:
I state facts with numbers and quotes.Blueduck said:
Ok, good, I was worried you were stating facts again.46XiJCAB said:
Good grief obviously it’s my opinion. And it’s correct. Trump rants about the deep state and when he has the chance to agree that Garland should be impeached, he shrinks.Blueduck said:
Is it a bored wide concensus that "one had the correct response" or is that just your opinion?46XiJCAB said:
It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.RoadTrip said:While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.
I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.
I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.
Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
If I'm Trump its a no win question but Im going to defer to the appropriate channels to address this.
I actually believe that is the smartest move for optics given the situation or else He's going to get dragged through the mud and crucified by MSM because he wants revenge against the man trying to ruin him and orange man verwy verwy bad!
As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
Maybe it's not the right time for Trump to be giving opinions on Bidens AG...But what do I know?
Im sure you know what best for him
Or maybe he’s just BSing all of you about getting the “deep state” which is much more likely given his track record of BS.
I use numbers and quotes.
I share my opinions.
Trump is a bullshitter. Undeniable Fact.
He he was BSing his supporters about getting the DS in 2016. Zero evidence his first 4 years. Fact.
But hey give him another 4-5 years if we’re unfortunate enough to have him elected.
He may be the deep state slayer Trump supporters believe he will be. I doubt he even cares. Opinion.
Yes, sometimes you sprinkle numbers and quotes in with your opinions and assumptions and hyperbole and sometimes you state facts too.
It seems like quite the opposite frankly.
Maybe a walk on the beach for perspective is in order.
You need a new outpitch.
You are far too emotional (for politics).
It’s no one’s fault but your, Liz.
Grow a pair.
I chortled. -
The judges would have accepted: Liars. Often emotionally immature and triggered.RoadTrip said:
Do victims of stalking habitually spend almost every waking hour at the scene of the crime? One might say they are looking for abuse.46XiJCAB said:
My stalker says I’m too emotional.pawz said:
Things 13 year old girls say.46XiJCAB said:
Says my stalker.pawz said:
Disagree.46XiJCAB said:
Don’t read my poasts if you find them confusing. IDGAF.Blueduck said:
Sometimes you shou46XiJCAB said:
I state facts with numbers and quotes.Blueduck said:
Ok, good, I was worried you were stating facts again.46XiJCAB said:
Good grief obviously it’s my opinion. And it’s correct. Trump rants about the deep state and when he has the chance to agree that Garland should be impeached, he shrinks.Blueduck said:
Is it a bored wide concensus that "one had the correct response" or is that just your opinion?46XiJCAB said:
It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.RoadTrip said:While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.
I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.
I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.
Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
If I'm Trump its a no win question but Im going to defer to the appropriate channels to address this.
I actually believe that is the smartest move for optics given the situation or else He's going to get dragged through the mud and crucified by MSM because he wants revenge against the man trying to ruin him and orange man verwy verwy bad!
As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
Maybe it's not the right time for Trump to be giving opinions on Bidens AG...But what do I know?
Im sure you know what best for him
Or maybe he’s just BSing all of you about getting the “deep state” which is much more likely given his track record of BS.
It doesn't matter how slow you type, your opinions do not magically become fact but it might help you separate facts from opinions if you slow down.46XiJCAB said:
Let me type this more s-l-o-w-l-y.Blueduck said:
You just tried to state a fact and then followed it with a hypothetical and an assumption.46XiJCAB said:
I state facts with numbers and quotes.Blueduck said:
Ok, good, I was worried you were stating facts again.46XiJCAB said:
Good grief obviously it’s my opinion. And it’s correct. Trump rants about the deep state and when he has the chance to agree that Garland should be impeached, he shrinks.Blueduck said:
Is it a bored wide concensus that "one had the correct response" or is that just your opinion?46XiJCAB said:
It’s a comparison and one candidate had the correct response and the other punted. I’m surprised Trump supporters are not somewhat dumbfounded by his response. They all seem to want Garland impeached. I could be wrong.RoadTrip said:While I like what RDS said, you of all people should be pleased with Trump’s response. You have been pointing out how Trump has been his own worst enemy and now that he shows some restraint because that is what is called for with a leading question like this you still complain??? Your TDS and obsession is doing harm and you can't see it.
I was told that I needed to provide reasons to vote for RDS. Comparing him to Trump is required since they’re the only two that matter.
I get it that no one here likes anyone to point these things out. But honestly IDGAF and it’s gonna be what I do here until this thing is over. If you don’t like it stop reading my poasts.
Here comes the obvious Race retort 3,2,1…
If I'm Trump its a no win question but Im going to defer to the appropriate channels to address this.
I actually believe that is the smartest move for optics given the situation or else He's going to get dragged through the mud and crucified by MSM because he wants revenge against the man trying to ruin him and orange man verwy verwy bad!
As an onlooker, concerning Garlands actions, my personal opinion would be yes, I believe an investigation should be started if it hasn't already.
Maybe it's not the right time for Trump to be giving opinions on Bidens AG...But what do I know?
Im sure you know what best for him
Or maybe he’s just BSing all of you about getting the “deep state” which is much more likely given his track record of BS.
I use numbers and quotes.
I share my opinions.
Trump is a bullshitter. Undeniable Fact.
He he was BSing his supporters about getting the DS in 2016. Zero evidence his first 4 years. Fact.
But hey give him another 4-5 years if we’re unfortunate enough to have him elected.
He may be the deep state slayer Trump supporters believe he will be. I doubt he even cares. Opinion.
Yes, sometimes you sprinkle numbers and quotes in with your opinions and assumptions and hyperbole and sometimes you state facts too.
It seems like quite the opposite frankly.
Maybe a walk on the beach for perspective is in order.
You need a new outpitch.
You are far too emotional (for politics).
It’s no one’s fault but your, Liz.
Grow a pair.
I chortled.
Which is what we clearly have here.
