Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Big if true

1356

Comments

  • coronabruin
    coronabruin Member Posts: 1,515
    Canadawg said:

    Keep the gay canuck shit off OUR bored! Go Avs!

    The lady doth protest too much
    Go burn your piece of shit city to the ground after losing another cup final, ya fuckin no natty fish fister.
  • Canadawg
    Canadawg Member Posts: 5,938

    Canadawg said:

    Keep the gay canuck shit off OUR bored! Go Avs!

    The lady doth protest too much
    Go burn your piece of shit city to the ground after losing another cup final, ya fuckin no natty fish fister.
    It just means more
  • ntxduck
    ntxduck Member Posts: 6,232

    Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.

    Anyone under the age of 37ish who answers no to this is a liar
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,473 Founders Club
    ntxduck said:

    Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.

    Anyone under the age of 37ish who answers no to this is a liar
    Only because, like TCU will show, getting to a championship no matter the results seems to give you momentum that lasts a really long time.
  • ntxduck
    ntxduck Member Posts: 6,232

    ntxduck said:

    Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.

    Anyone under the age of 37ish who answers no to this is a liar

    I said 37 not 137
  • 1to392831weretaken
    1to392831weretaken Member Posts: 7,696
    ntxduck said:

    Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.

    Anyone under the age of 37ish who answers no to this is a liar
    There's somebody here other than Fudgie that's under 37?