Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Pump my gas duck - couch sale, double feature

2

Comments

  • Joey
    Joey Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,276 Founders Club
    First and right. On everything involving Oregon and recruiting.
  • ntxduck
    ntxduck Member Posts: 6,143

    ntxduck said:

    ntxduck said:

    Oregon lost 2 more Lanning recruits today (thats 5 or 6 now). Oregon fans are pretty sure it's because they were really good but once they saw the list of high school prospects that Lanning is bringing in next year, they realized they would never see the field.

    Also interesting, Oregon has had 7 linebackers transfer out this offseason. I don't think UW even has 7 scholarship LBs

    You should be processing out 5-6 kids from the previous year’s class every season or you’re doing it wrong. Highly recruited kids show up on campus and within a week of fall camp you know which ones you need to cut already.

    It’s one of the reasons why the SEC has been kicking everyone’s ass for the last decade + while Oregon and Washington have been letting glorified walk ons stay on the roster for 5 years.

    Also iirc 4 of those guys (including taggart) signed less than 48 hours after lanning was hired, so I wouldn’t really categorize them as “his guys”.
    Sounds like player development is at an all time high.
    What does player development have to do with kids who are on campus for a week? Some kids just don’t have it, no matter how they looked in HS, and it’s usually very apparent early on. See; smalls. UW should have told him to go portaling after his freshman (or sophomore) season. Would have given you another bite at the apple with another kid you could have brought in. If that kid sucks, portal his ass too. It’s a numbers game. You get as many kids in as you can every year. And in order to do that, you tell the ones who aren’t really going to be contributors to look elsewhere. It kinda sucks that that is what college football has become, but the SEC has been playing that game with medical retirements and suddenly senior-ing for 15 years now. And it allows them to bring in 30+ new guys each year
    Smalls was actually at his best his freshman year in 2020. Trice was nothing. Odunze and McMillan literally could not catch when they were freshman or fight for the ball in Macmillan’s case. Bbk was dragged by everyone for a couple of years before he took off. Culp actually sucked pretty bad. Kevin king was awful until they moved him to the slot and then corner. Tyler Huntley was awful his first 3 years at Utah. Off the top of my head that a lot of nfl draft picks or future picks that were bad when they arrived. Players can actually get better. Foreign concept to some programs. Oregon is not alone how they go about it, but acting you know when their 18 years old is stupid.
    The guys who you tell to get lost after 1 year usually aren’t talent/size related. Think about what separates smalls from the guys above and you’ll get it.
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,937
    ntxduck said:

    ntxduck said:

    ntxduck said:

    Oregon lost 2 more Lanning recruits today (thats 5 or 6 now). Oregon fans are pretty sure it's because they were really good but once they saw the list of high school prospects that Lanning is bringing in next year, they realized they would never see the field.

    Also interesting, Oregon has had 7 linebackers transfer out this offseason. I don't think UW even has 7 scholarship LBs

    You should be processing out 5-6 kids from the previous year’s class every season or you’re doing it wrong. Highly recruited kids show up on campus and within a week of fall camp you know which ones you need to cut already.

    It’s one of the reasons why the SEC has been kicking everyone’s ass for the last decade + while Oregon and Washington have been letting glorified walk ons stay on the roster for 5 years.

    Also iirc 4 of those guys (including taggart) signed less than 48 hours after lanning was hired, so I wouldn’t really categorize them as “his guys”.
    Sounds like player development is at an all time high.
    What does player development have to do with kids who are on campus for a week? Some kids just don’t have it, no matter how they looked in HS, and it’s usually very apparent early on. See; smalls. UW should have told him to go portaling after his freshman (or sophomore) season. Would have given you another bite at the apple with another kid you could have brought in. If that kid sucks, portal his ass too. It’s a numbers game. You get as many kids in as you can every year. And in order to do that, you tell the ones who aren’t really going to be contributors to look elsewhere. It kinda sucks that that is what college football has become, but the SEC has been playing that game with medical retirements and suddenly senior-ing for 15 years now. And it allows them to bring in 30+ new guys each year
    Smalls was actually at his best his freshman year in 2020. Trice was nothing. Odunze and McMillan literally could not catch when they were freshman or fight for the ball in Macmillan’s case. Bbk was dragged by everyone for a couple of years before he took off. Culp actually sucked pretty bad. Kevin king was awful until they moved him to the slot and then corner. Tyler Huntley was awful his first 3 years at Utah. Off the top of my head that a lot of nfl draft picks or future picks that were bad when they arrived. Players can actually get better. Foreign concept to some programs. Oregon is not alone how they go about it, but acting you know when their 18 years old is stupid.
    The guys who you tell to get lost after 1 year usually aren’t talent/size related. Think about what separates smalls from the guys above and you’ll get it.
    Yeah as fans we have no in sight into their mental make up and drive to work.
  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,331
    ntxduck said:

    ntxduck said:

    ntxduck said:

    Oregon lost 2 more Lanning recruits today (thats 5 or 6 now). Oregon fans are pretty sure it's because they were really good but once they saw the list of high school prospects that Lanning is bringing in next year, they realized they would never see the field.

    Also interesting, Oregon has had 7 linebackers transfer out this offseason. I don't think UW even has 7 scholarship LBs

    You should be processing out 5-6 kids from the previous year’s class every season or you’re doing it wrong. Highly recruited kids show up on campus and within a week of fall camp you know which ones you need to cut already.

    It’s one of the reasons why the SEC has been kicking everyone’s ass for the last decade + while Oregon and Washington have been letting glorified walk ons stay on the roster for 5 years.

    Also iirc 4 of those guys (including taggart) signed less than 48 hours after lanning was hired, so I wouldn’t really categorize them as “his guys”.
    Sounds like player development is at an all time high.
    What does player development have to do with kids who are on campus for a week? Some kids just don’t have it, no matter how they looked in HS, and it’s usually very apparent early on. See; smalls. UW should have told him to go portaling after his freshman (or sophomore) season. Would have given you another bite at the apple with another kid you could have brought in. If that kid sucks, portal his ass too. It’s a numbers game. You get as many kids in as you can every year. And in order to do that, you tell the ones who aren’t really going to be contributors to look elsewhere. It kinda sucks that that is what college football has become, but the SEC has been playing that game with medical retirements and suddenly senior-ing for 15 years now. And it allows them to bring in 30+ new guys each year
    Smalls was actually at his best his freshman year in 2020. Trice was nothing. Odunze and McMillan literally could not catch when they were freshman or fight for the ball in Macmillan’s case. Bbk was dragged by everyone for a couple of years before he took off. Culp actually sucked pretty bad. Kevin king was awful until they moved him to the slot and then corner. Tyler Huntley was awful his first 3 years at Utah. Off the top of my head that a lot of nfl draft picks or future picks that were bad when they arrived. Players can actually get better. Foreign concept to some programs. Oregon is not alone how they go about it, but acting you know when their 18 years old is stupid.
    The guys who you tell to get lost after 1 year usually aren’t talent/size related. Think about what separates smalls from the guys above and you’ll get it.
    Smalls rumored to not work hard off of the field (weight room etc…)

    And he was always overrated. Probably could be a contributor as a senior if he really wanted it. Didn’t appear that he did. You don’t know this in fall camp their freshmen year though.
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,513
    And another



    Duck 247 mod says our old friend Sir Mells is rumored to be next
  • ntxduck
    ntxduck Member Posts: 6,143
    ntxduck said:

    And another



    Duck 247 mod says our old friend Sir Mells is rumored to be next
    Please god have smells portal


    Thank you jeebus
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,369
    edited April 2023
    Good Lord. ELITE! Dylan Morris, Asa Turner. Taki. @backthepack

    Stan Empterman wasn't even rated!
  • ntxduck
    ntxduck Member Posts: 6,143
    Impossible to read the replies to that and not agree that Oregon has the dumbest fucking online fanbase around. Smells may not even get a d1 offer in the portal. He can’t bench press 250 lbs as a DL
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,937
    ntxduck said:

    Impossible to read the replies to that and not agree that Oregon has the dumbest fucking online fanbase around. Smells may not even get a d1 offer in the portal. He can’t bench press 250 lbs as a DL
    no way that's true 😭😭
  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,303 Standard Supporter

    Oregon lost 2 more Lanning recruits today (thats 5 or 6 now). Oregon fans are pretty sure it's because they were really good but once they saw the list of high school prospects that Lanning is bringing in next year, they realized they would never see the field.

    Also interesting, Oregon has had 7 linebackers transfer out this offseason. I don't think UW even has 7 scholarship LBs

    What do you mean recruits? You mean players? They're well over the scholarship limit, of course guys are going to leave. Are you fucking stupid?
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,513
    dtd said:

    Oregon lost 2 more Lanning recruits today (thats 5 or 6 now). Oregon fans are pretty sure it's because they were really good but once they saw the list of high school prospects that Lanning is bringing in next year, they realized they would never see the field.

    Also interesting, Oregon has had 7 linebackers transfer out this offseason. I don't think UW even has 7 scholarship LBs

    What do you mean recruits? You mean players? They're well over the scholarship limit, of course guys are going to leave. Are you fucking stupid?
    I mean guys who were recruited by and committed to Lanning (the coach who has only been there for a year)
  • EwaDawg
    EwaDawg Member Posts: 4,336

    dtd said:

    Oregon lost 2 more Lanning recruits today (thats 5 or 6 now). Oregon fans are pretty sure it's because they were really good but once they saw the list of high school prospects that Lanning is bringing in next year, they realized they would never see the field.

    Also interesting, Oregon has had 7 linebackers transfer out this offseason. I don't think UW even has 7 scholarship LBs

    What do you mean recruits? You mean players? They're well over the scholarship limit, of course guys are going to leave. Are you fucking stupid?
    I mean guys who were recruited by and committed to Lanning (the coach who has only been there for a year)
    Thanks. Everyone but the resident thread idiot (dtd) knew what a Lanning recruit is.
  • ntxduck
    ntxduck Member Posts: 6,143
    edited April 2023

    dtd said:

    Oregon lost 2 more Lanning recruits today (thats 5 or 6 now). Oregon fans are pretty sure it's because they were really good but once they saw the list of high school prospects that Lanning is bringing in next year, they realized they would never see the field.

    Also interesting, Oregon has had 7 linebackers transfer out this offseason. I don't think UW even has 7 scholarship LBs

    What do you mean recruits? You mean players? They're well over the scholarship limit, of course guys are going to leave. Are you fucking stupid?
    I mean guys who were recruited by and committed to Lanning (the coach who has only been there for a year)
    A lanning recruit is a guy who signed <48 hours after he was hired? Seems disingenuous
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,991
    ntxduck said:

    dtd said:

    Oregon lost 2 more Lanning recruits today (thats 5 or 6 now). Oregon fans are pretty sure it's because they were really good but once they saw the list of high school prospects that Lanning is bringing in next year, they realized they would never see the field.

    Also interesting, Oregon has had 7 linebackers transfer out this offseason. I don't think UW even has 7 scholarship LBs

    What do you mean recruits? You mean players? They're well over the scholarship limit, of course guys are going to leave. Are you fucking stupid?
    I mean guys who were recruited by and committed to Lanning (the coach who has only been there for a year)
    A lanning recruit is a guy who signed <48 hours after he was hired? Seems disingenuous </p>
    Do you consider Trey Adams a Sark recruit or a Petersen recruit?
  • ntxduck
    ntxduck Member Posts: 6,143

    ntxduck said:

    dtd said:

    Oregon lost 2 more Lanning recruits today (thats 5 or 6 now). Oregon fans are pretty sure it's because they were really good but once they saw the list of high school prospects that Lanning is bringing in next year, they realized they would never see the field.

    Also interesting, Oregon has had 7 linebackers transfer out this offseason. I don't think UW even has 7 scholarship LBs

    What do you mean recruits? You mean players? They're well over the scholarship limit, of course guys are going to leave. Are you fucking stupid?
    I mean guys who were recruited by and committed to Lanning (the coach who has only been there for a year)
    A lanning recruit is a guy who signed <48 hours after he was hired? Seems disingenuous </p>
    Do you consider Trey Adams a Sark recruit or a Petersen recruit?
    Did early signing day exist when he signed?
  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,303 Standard Supporter
    edited April 2023

    dtd said:

    Oregon lost 2 more Lanning recruits today (thats 5 or 6 now). Oregon fans are pretty sure it's because they were really good but once they saw the list of high school prospects that Lanning is bringing in next year, they realized they would never see the field.

    Also interesting, Oregon has had 7 linebackers transfer out this offseason. I don't think UW even has 7 scholarship LBs

    What do you mean recruits? You mean players? They're well over the scholarship limit, of course guys are going to leave. Are you fucking stupid?
    I mean guys who were recruited by and committed to Lanning (the coach who has only been there for a year)
    Yeah, you're a fucking idiot. Mells committed to Oregon 6 months before Lanning took over. You know how this works when a new coach takes over, right?
  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,303 Standard Supporter
    edited April 2023
    ntxduck said:

    dtd said:

    Oregon lost 2 more Lanning recruits today (thats 5 or 6 now). Oregon fans are pretty sure it's because they were really good but once they saw the list of high school prospects that Lanning is bringing in next year, they realized they would never see the field.

    Also interesting, Oregon has had 7 linebackers transfer out this offseason. I don't think UW even has 7 scholarship LBs

    What do you mean recruits? You mean players? They're well over the scholarship limit, of course guys are going to leave. Are you fucking stupid?
    I mean guys who were recruited by and committed to Lanning (the coach who has only been there for a year)
    A lanning recruit is a guy who signed <48 hours after he was hired? Seems disingenuous </p>
    He's not smart enough to be disingenuous. Race at least knows what's he's doing when he trolls, unlike these flailing retards.
  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,303 Standard Supporter
    EwaDawg said:

    dtd said:

    Oregon lost 2 more Lanning recruits today (thats 5 or 6 now). Oregon fans are pretty sure it's because they were really good but once they saw the list of high school prospects that Lanning is bringing in next year, they realized they would never see the field.

    Also interesting, Oregon has had 7 linebackers transfer out this offseason. I don't think UW even has 7 scholarship LBs

    What do you mean recruits? You mean players? They're well over the scholarship limit, of course guys are going to leave. Are you fucking stupid?
    I mean guys who were recruited by and committed to Lanning (the coach who has only been there for a year)
    Thanks. Everyone but the resident thread idiot (dtd) knew what a Lanning recruit is.
    It takes 30 seconds to find out you're wrong, but go on with the narrative. Dipshit.
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,317 Founders Club
    ntxduck said:

    chuck said:

    This thread is off the rails. It should be all about making fun of Sir Mells and the retards who recruited him.

    Everyone knew he wasn't good, even Oregon coaches and fans. They took him because they could. Husky fans were annoyed with that, but recognized that it was only a symbolic loss. Duck fans reveled in the recruiting clout knowing full well he'd be a portal entry before too long.

    I'm just pleased to see it has run it's full course and that I was somewhere around 15th and right.

    I honestly can’t believe he left. The new staff tried to get him to leave literally one week into his career. He showed up and immediately they told him “you’re never going to play here”. Him and his mom posted a bunch of cry face/whiny emojis and I thought for sure he was gone. I guess he finally got the hint that they were serious. Dude was the epitome of the Mario “offer any 4 star that breathes” strategy.
    He was a 4 star?
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,991
    ntxduck said:

    ntxduck said:

    dtd said:

    Oregon lost 2 more Lanning recruits today (thats 5 or 6 now). Oregon fans are pretty sure it's because they were really good but once they saw the list of high school prospects that Lanning is bringing in next year, they realized they would never see the field.

    Also interesting, Oregon has had 7 linebackers transfer out this offseason. I don't think UW even has 7 scholarship LBs

    What do you mean recruits? You mean players? They're well over the scholarship limit, of course guys are going to leave. Are you fucking stupid?
    I mean guys who were recruited by and committed to Lanning (the coach who has only been there for a year)
    A lanning recruit is a guy who signed <48 hours after he was hired? Seems disingenuous </p>
    Do you consider Trey Adams a Sark recruit or a Petersen recruit?
    Did early signing day exist when he signed?
    No.