ESPN reportedly predicts UW to finish 8-4 this season
Comments
-
Thanks Taft!
#metoo -
How can UW possibly deal with the loss of two 5 star recruits??????
-
Sounds a little high
-
-
TCU lost their Championship game and were "gifted" entrance into the playoffs. Michigan plays its worst game possible yet only comes back to win. TCU goes on to play Georgia. I didn't even watch the game. "I'm not paying money to watch TCU get butchered". Woke up the next morning 65-7. That was 3+ hours saved. TCU was a cinderella team in a conference that wasn't that good.
ESPN is marginal entertainment. If you used their "insight" for actually betting you'd end up broke. -
One of the main predictors of a quality team to the computers are blowout wins. The computers don't like UW much because every game was sorta close thanks to one of the worst passing defenses i've ever seen.
If the D makes any type of step forward and allows for some score separation, UW will shoot up these polls.
The reality is, we easily could have been 9-4 last year without tweaking much. The D needs to get stops or we're fucked. -
Totally agree. I know it was a spring scrimmage but the moves of Powell and Hampton looked like good ones on Saturday. The CBs look better. I’ll be shocked if by the end of fall camp a rotation of Mohammed, Dixon and Jackson aren’t better than any combo that was trotted out last year. The D line consistently reset the LOS and that allowed the LBs to flow unencumbered to the ball. I think a step forward should be expected not hoped for. Year 1 to year 2 at Fresno was drastic in terms of scoring defense for this staff. I’m hoping the defense can rest into that 18-20ppg zone next year. If the offense scores 40 again this team should be very hard to beat.Doogles said:One of the main predictors of a quality team to the computers are blowout wins. The computers don't like UW much because every game was sorta close thanks to one of the worst passing defenses i've ever seen.
If the D makes any type of step forward and allows for some score separation, UW will shoot up these polls.
The reality is, we easily could have been 9-4 last year without tweaking much. The D needs to get stops or we're fucked. -
Fuck ESPN.
It's certainly possible to lose some close games, but the team just looked and played better than all of their opponents in the 4th quarter, and that's coaching and S+C.
Even against UCLA and ASU.
Not sure if it's been mentioned but fuck ESPN -
8-4 would be a massive disappointment.
The O/U for Oregon, USC, and UW should be 10-10.5
-
ESPN also takes into account their shitty recruiting rankings even though they won’t say it.
-
DeBoer wouldn't be encouraging his players to publicly shoot for the moon if he didn't think the backend could hold up this coming seasonDoogles said:One of the main predictors of a quality team to the computers are blowout wins. The computers don't like UW much because every game was sorta close thanks to one of the worst passing defenses i've ever seen.
If the D makes any type of step forward and allows for some score separation, UW will shoot up these polls.
The reality is, we easily could have been 9-4 last year without tweaking much. The D needs to get stops or we're fucked.
Even last year DeBoer said he didn't want to put a limit in his players' heads about how far they could go. -
Edge, lb, and db positions looked much more competent in the spring game.theknowledge said:
Totally agree. I know it was a spring scrimmage but the moves of Powell and Hampton looked like good ones on Saturday. The CBs look better. I’ll be shocked if by the end of fall camp a rotation of Mohammed, Dixon and Jackson aren’t better than any combo that was trotted out last year. The D line consistently reset the LOS and that allowed the LBs to flow unencumbered to the ball. I think a step forward should be expected not hoped for. Year 1 to year 2 at Fresno was drastic in terms of scoring defense for this staff. I’m hoping the defense can rest into that 18-20ppg zone next year. If the offense scores 40 again this team should be very hard to beat.Doogles said:One of the main predictors of a quality team to the computers are blowout wins. The computers don't like UW much because every game was sorta close thanks to one of the worst passing defenses i've ever seen.
If the D makes any type of step forward and allows for some score separation, UW will shoot up these polls.
The reality is, we easily could have been 9-4 last year without tweaking much. The D needs to get stops or we're fucked.
Virtually all the transfers on d looked like upgrades to the depth.
I think the d will be legitimately above average. -
Edge was always extremely competent
-
jesus you still visit ESPN?
-
Never trust the Dutch.DerekJohnson said:
DeBoer wouldn't be encouraging his players to publicly shoot for the moon if he didn't think the backend could hold up this coming seasonDoogles said:One of the main predictors of a quality team to the computers are blowout wins. The computers don't like UW much because every game was sorta close thanks to one of the worst passing defenses i've ever seen.
If the D makes any type of step forward and allows for some score separation, UW will shoot up these polls.
The reality is, we easily could have been 9-4 last year without tweaking much. The D needs to get stops or we're fucked.
Even last year DeBoer said he didn't want to put a limit in his players' heads about how far they could go. -
If I had visited ESPN, would I not therefore have a link to post, sir?FireCohen said:jesus you still visit ESPN?
-
Dwayne Washington:fumbling problems::GRUNDLE:Dutch hatredGrundleStiltzkin said:
Never trust the Dutch.DerekJohnson said:
DeBoer wouldn't be encouraging his players to publicly shoot for the moon if he didn't think the backend could hold up this coming seasonDoogles said:One of the main predictors of a quality team to the computers are blowout wins. The computers don't like UW much because every game was sorta close thanks to one of the worst passing defenses i've ever seen.
If the D makes any type of step forward and allows for some score separation, UW will shoot up these polls.
The reality is, we easily could have been 9-4 last year without tweaking much. The D needs to get stops or we're fucked.
Even last year DeBoer said he didn't want to put a limit in his players' heads about how far they could go. -
GrundleStiltzkin said:
Never trust Dutch Ovens.DerekJohnson said:
DeBoer wouldn't be encouraging his players to publicly shoot for the moon if he didn't think the backend could hold up this coming seasonDoogles said:One of the main predictors of a quality team to the computers are blowout wins. The computers don't like UW much because every game was sorta close thanks to one of the worst passing defenses i've ever seen.
If the D makes any type of step forward and allows for some score separation, UW will shoot up these polls.
The reality is, we easily could have been 9-4 last year without tweaking much. The D needs to get stops or we're fucked.
Even last year DeBoer said he didn't want to put a limit in his players' heads about how far they could go. -
-
Outside of Trice it wasn’t really special last year IMO. ZTF was okay. I guess you could say competent, but durfee really makes it a genuinely good group.backthepack said:Edge was always extremely competent
-
Martin was as good as Trice. He didn't have as many sacks but he was a consistent force. The D would've taken a huge step back without him.Kingdome_Urinals said:
Outside of Trice it wasn’t really special last year IMO. ZTF was okay. I guess you could say competent, but durfee really makes it a genuinely good group.backthepack said:Edge was always extremely competent
-
Well, it couldn't have taken too big a step back. It was pretty much up against the edge of the cliff already.chuck said:
Martin was as good as Trice. He didn't have as many sacks but he was a consistent force. The D would've taken a huge step back without him.Kingdome_Urinals said:
Outside of Trice it wasn’t really special last year IMO. ZTF was okay. I guess you could say competent, but durfee really makes it a genuinely good group.backthepack said:Edge was always extremely competent
-
FPI is shit and you’re all fags
-
Anything that takes into account 2021 UW into how 2023 UW will do given all the changes, is fucking retarded.dnc said:FPI is shit and you’re all fags
It was brought up about that and the response was your typical "yeah but still" shit. -
Well if we? didn't get a lot of pressure the defense would've...well... yeah nevermind. You're right.TheHB said:
Well, it couldn't have taken too big a step back. It was pretty much up against the edge of the cliff already.chuck said:
Martin was as good as Trice. He didn't have as many sacks but he was a consistent force. The D would've taken a huge step back without him.Kingdome_Urinals said:
Outside of Trice it wasn’t really special last year IMO. ZTF was okay. I guess you could say competent, but durfee really makes it a genuinely good group.backthepack said:Edge was always extremely competent
-
If we have someone step in this year and be as good as Martin was I will be thrilled. One of the more underated players last yearchuck said:
Martin was as good as Trice. He didn't have as many sacks but he was a consistent force. The D would've taken a huge step back without him.Kingdome_Urinals said:
Outside of Trice it wasn’t really special last year IMO. ZTF was okay. I guess you could say competent, but durfee really makes it a genuinely good group.backthepack said:Edge was always extremely competent
