Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

What do you want to bet that this guy also attended an Ivy League Law School

1…457910

Comments

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,503 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Fuck, I even know what that is.

    Now all the girls are going to pretend that a "Brady motion" is a commonly seen thing and a frequently used term so they can play gotcha along with Senator Kennedy.

    It isn't, of course. A majority of Daddy's nominees are thankful Kennedy didn't ask them about it.
    Must

    Defend

    Everything

    But TRUMP

    Daddy

    The girls aren't nominated to be a judge

    Guess you didn't know either

    Matchbook law school grad
    Race pretends he knew the term.

    If he didn't know exculpatory evidence has to be shared with the defense, that would be surprising. That he didn't know the defense tool for challenging the prosecution's adherence to that principle is called a "Brady motion", is not that surprising. Most lawyers don't practice criminal law. He's never presided over a criminal case.
    Sounds like a great nominee for Judge then.
    Yeah he hasn’t memorized all US law. Unlike the rest of the judiciary.
    Nominees for judicial positions should be able answer tougher legal questions than "how many people are on a jury?", Dazzler.

    Though - how many people are on a jury, Dazzler?

    It depends, Madam.
    Didn’t ask what adult diapers you’re wearing, misogynist.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    edited March 2023
    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Fuck, I even know what that is.

    Now all the girls are going to pretend that a "Brady motion" is a commonly seen thing and a frequently used term so they can play gotcha along with Senator Kennedy.

    It isn't, of course. A majority of Daddy's nominees are thankful Kennedy didn't ask them about it.
    Must

    Defend

    Everything

    But TRUMP

    Daddy

    The girls aren't nominated to be a judge

    Guess you didn't know either

    Matchbook law school grad
    Race pretends he knew the term.

    If he didn't know exculpatory evidence has to be shared with the defense, that would be surprising. That he didn't know the defense tool for challenging the prosecution's adherence to that principle is called a "Brady motion", is not that surprising. Most lawyers don't practice criminal law. He's never presided over a criminal case.
    Sounds like a great nominee for Judge then.
    Yeah he hasn’t memorized all US law. Unlike the rest of the judiciary.
    Nominees for judicial positions should be able answer tougher legal questions than "how many people are on a jury?", Dazzler.

    Though - how many people are on a jury, Dazzler?

    It depends, Madam.
    Didn’t ask what adult diapers you’re wearing, misogynist.

    You thought you knew, didn’t you lady?

    Don’t take it too hard. I still agree with all your takes on Cheetos.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,503 Standard Supporter
    edited March 2023
    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Fuck, I even know what that is.

    Now all the girls are going to pretend that a "Brady motion" is a commonly seen thing and a frequently used term so they can play gotcha along with Senator Kennedy.

    It isn't, of course. A majority of Daddy's nominees are thankful Kennedy didn't ask them about it.
    Must

    Defend

    Everything

    But TRUMP

    Daddy

    The girls aren't nominated to be a judge

    Guess you didn't know either

    Matchbook law school grad
    Race pretends he knew the term.

    If he didn't know exculpatory evidence has to be shared with the defense, that would be surprising. That he didn't know the defense tool for challenging the prosecution's adherence to that principle is called a "Brady motion", is not that surprising. Most lawyers don't practice criminal law. He's never presided over a criminal case.
    Sounds like a great nominee for Judge then.
    Yeah he hasn’t memorized all US law. Unlike the rest of the judiciary.
    Nominees for judicial positions should be able answer tougher legal questions than "how many people are on a jury?", Dazzler.

    Though - how many people are on a jury, Dazzler?

    It depends, Madam.
    Didn’t ask what adult diapers you’re wearing, misogynist.

    You thought you knew, didn’t you lady?

    Don’t take it too hard. I still agree with all your takes on Cheetos.
    I'm not a lawyer. And apparently because you can't answer the question, neither are you, poopy pants.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Fuck, I even know what that is.

    Now all the girls are going to pretend that a "Brady motion" is a commonly seen thing and a frequently used term so they can play gotcha along with Senator Kennedy.

    It isn't, of course. A majority of Daddy's nominees are thankful Kennedy didn't ask them about it.
    Must

    Defend

    Everything

    But TRUMP

    Daddy

    The girls aren't nominated to be a judge

    Guess you didn't know either

    Matchbook law school grad
    Race pretends he knew the term.

    If he didn't know exculpatory evidence has to be shared with the defense, that would be surprising. That he didn't know the defense tool for challenging the prosecution's adherence to that principle is called a "Brady motion", is not that surprising. Most lawyers don't practice criminal law. He's never presided over a criminal case.
    Sounds like a great nominee for Judge then.
    Yeah he hasn’t memorized all US law. Unlike the rest of the judiciary.
    Nominees for judicial positions should be able answer tougher legal questions than "how many people are on a jury?", Dazzler.

    Though - how many people are on a jury, Dazzler?

    It depends, Madam.
    Didn’t ask what adult diapers you’re wearing, misogynist.

    You thought you knew, didn’t you lady?

    Don’t take it too hard. I still agree with all your takes on Cheetos.
    I'm not a lawyer. And apparently because you can't answer the question, neither are you, poopy pants.

    I answered it. My answer was correct.

    You just don’t know as much as you think you do, Mildred.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,240 Founders Club
    RaceBannon said:

    The new standard for federal judges is that they know as much as tug posters

    This guy failed that too

    Bob C and Sled knew it

    H didn't

    We are beating epidemiologists and now federal judge appointees. Also head of the treasury.

    Too much winning.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,503 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Fuck, I even know what that is.

    Now all the girls are going to pretend that a "Brady motion" is a commonly seen thing and a frequently used term so they can play gotcha along with Senator Kennedy.

    It isn't, of course. A majority of Daddy's nominees are thankful Kennedy didn't ask them about it.
    Must

    Defend

    Everything

    But TRUMP

    Daddy

    The girls aren't nominated to be a judge

    Guess you didn't know either

    Matchbook law school grad
    Race pretends he knew the term.

    If he didn't know exculpatory evidence has to be shared with the defense, that would be surprising. That he didn't know the defense tool for challenging the prosecution's adherence to that principle is called a "Brady motion", is not that surprising. Most lawyers don't practice criminal law. He's never presided over a criminal case.
    Sounds like a great nominee for Judge then.
    Yeah he hasn’t memorized all US law. Unlike the rest of the judiciary.
    Nominees for judicial positions should be able answer tougher legal questions than "how many people are on a jury?", Dazzler.

    Though - how many people are on a jury, Dazzler?

    It depends, Madam.
    Didn’t ask what adult diapers you’re wearing, misogynist.

    You thought you knew, didn’t you lady?

    Don’t take it too hard. I still agree with all your takes on Cheetos.
    I'm not a lawyer. And apparently because you can't answer the question, neither are you, poopy pants.

    I answered it. My answer was correct.

    You just don’t know as much as you think you do, Mildred.
    Channeling your inner @MelloDawgFS by refusing to answer or use big words.

    Fuck off.

    Go work on your Russian State narrative homework.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,274
    edited March 2023
    Being the centrist that I yam, I declare:

    1. It’s not a term with same universal recognition as that enjoyed by Miranda such that it can accurately be described by the avg person or even lawyer. Those of us who declined the trial practice don’t remember anything from criminal or con law.

    2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.

    Actually, the Ivy League dodges this one. Black eye for Arizona law school IMO.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    creepycoug said:




    2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.

    I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    creepycoug said:




    2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.

    I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.
    Losers lose. It’s what they do.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,503 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    creepycoug said:




    2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.

    I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.
    Why would we taken legal advice from you, Dazzler?

    You still didn't answer or explain the jury number question.

    Or finish your Russian state narrative brief homework.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter