Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

What do you want to bet that this guy also attended an Ivy League Law School

1…456810

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    creepycoug said:




    2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.

    I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.
    Why would we taken legal advice from you, Dazzler?

    You still didn't answer or explain the jury number question.

    Or finish your Russian state narrative brief homework.
    I know you thought it was 12.

    Not always.

    Sorry, Mabel.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,503 Standard Supporter
    edited March 2023
    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    creepycoug said:




    2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.

    I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.
    Why would we taken legal advice from you, Dazzler?

    You still didn't answer or explain the jury number question.

    Or finish your Russian state narrative brief homework.
    I know you thought it was 12.

    Not always.

    Sorry, Mabel.
    Now you’re a fucking mind reader. You know what I thought

    Still unable to answer the question.

    Cereal box top lawyer.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    creepycoug said:




    2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.

    I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.
    Why would we taken legal advice from you, Dazzler?

    You still didn't answer or explain the jury number question.

    Or finish your Russian state narrative brief homework.
    I know you thought it was 12.

    Not always.

    Sorry, Mabel.
    Now you’re a fucking mind reader. You know what I thought

    You're not complicated, Delores.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,503 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    creepycoug said:




    2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.

    I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.
    Why would we taken legal advice from you, Dazzler?

    You still didn't answer or explain the jury number question.

    Or finish your Russian state narrative brief homework.
    I know you thought it was 12.

    Not always.

    Sorry, Mabel.
    Now you’re a fucking mind reader. You know what I thought

    You're not complicated, Delores.
    Still can’t answer the question.

    Still a cereal box pretend lawyer
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    creepycoug said:




    2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.

    I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.
    Why would we taken legal advice from you, Dazzler?

    You still didn't answer or explain the jury number question.

    Or finish your Russian state narrative brief homework.
    I know you thought it was 12.

    Not always.

    Sorry, Mabel.
    Now you’re a fucking mind reader. You know what I thought

    You're not complicated, Delores.
    Still can’t answer the question.

    Still a cereal box pretend lawyer
    see what i mean?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    creepycoug said:




    2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.

    I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.
    Why would we taken legal advice from you, Dazzler?

    You still didn't answer or explain the jury number question.

    Or finish your Russian state narrative brief homework.
    I know you thought it was 12.

    Not always.

    Sorry, Mabel.
    Now you’re a fucking mind reader. You know what I thought

    You're not complicated, Delores.
    Still can’t answer the question.

    Still a cereal box pretend lawyer
    see what i mean?
    No.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,274
    HHusky said:

    creepycoug said:




    2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.

    I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.
    Of course I wouldn’t know, but something tells me that’s not right.

    I’ve now officially over-invested in this.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    creepycoug said:

    HHusky said:

    creepycoug said:




    2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.

    I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.
    Of course I wouldn’t know, but something tells me that’s not right.

    I’ve now officially over-invested in this.
    Big belly laughs in Savery Hall.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,503 Standard Supporter
    edited March 2023
    creepycoug said:

    HHusky said:

    creepycoug said:




    2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.

    I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.
    Of course I wouldn’t know, but something tells me that’s not right.

    I’ve now officially over-invested in this.
    You can check out any time you want but you can never leave, @creepycoug

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    creepycoug said:

    HHusky said:

    creepycoug said:




    2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.

    I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.
    Of course I wouldn’t know, but something tells me that’s not right.

    I’ve now officially over-invested in this.
    It's a stupid gotcha designed for the stupid in the stupid party. As you suspect, it was never a thing in law school, bar review, etc.

    Our crooked cops on the bored know it from experience.

    Your over investment is nothing compared to mine.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter