Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

How Many Transfers Will Start in 2023?

DerekJohnson
DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,229 Founders Club
in Hardcore Husky Board
https://si.com/college/washington/football/how-many-transfers-will-start-in-2023
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

    Thanks Taft!

    This article has been marked safe from DRFS. @Mad_Son

    TYFYS
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NeGgaPlEaSe
    NeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,756
    Polk versus Bernard will be the 2023 battle I see as interesting. Johnson, Muhammad, Goforth for sure, Cuevas, Durfee strong possibility along with Bernard.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,990
    NeGgaPlEaSe said:

    Polk versus Bernard will be the 2023 battle I see as interesting. Johnson, Muhammad, Goforth for sure, Cuevas, Durfee strong possibility along with Bernard.

    So pretty much everyone but Ngata?

    That seems about right.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,425 Founders Club
    Thanks Nacho!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,671 Swaye's Wigwam
    Thaddeus Dixon...finally remembered his name...is my dark horse pick to start at CB as I've said many times.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,671 Swaye's Wigwam
    AtomicDawg said:

    NeGgaPlEaSe said:

    Polk versus Bernard will be the 2023 battle I see as interesting. Johnson, Muhammad, Goforth for sure, Cuevas, Durfee strong possibility along with Bernard.

    Unless he is injured Polk is no worse than the 3rd wr.
    Agree. It's crowded. Bernard is competing with everyone below Polk to be the primary 4th receiver this season barring injury.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,229 Founders Club
    pawz said:

    Thanks Nacho!

    Thank you for thanking me for thanking Taft! @pawz!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,671 Swaye's Wigwam
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

    chuck said:

    AtomicDawg said:

    NeGgaPlEaSe said:

    Polk versus Bernard will be the 2023 battle I see as interesting. Johnson, Muhammad, Goforth for sure, Cuevas, Durfee strong possibility along with Bernard.

    Unless he is injured Polk is no worse than the 3rd wr.
    Agree. It's crowded. Bernard is competing with everyone below Polk to be the primary 4th receiver this season barring injury.
    As opposed to the secondary 4th receiver?
    Exactly. Nobody accepts being called #5.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DawgOfTheAges
    DawgOfTheAges Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,747 Founders Club
    edited March 2023
    Bernard is going to be good enough that McMillan can move inside to the slot which he will probably like from a visibility standpoint for the one third to half of the snaps that Bernard might get.

    More is more, Bernard is going to play.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SonnyShackelford
    SonnyShackelford Member Posts: 1,005
    Germie will play sparingly
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,720 Founders Club
    This has already been discussed, but Polk is probably the best #3 you'll see next year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SonnyShackelford
    SonnyShackelford Member Posts: 1,005
    Doogles said:

    This has already been discussed, but Polk is probably the best #3 you'll see next year.

    And T Davis the best #4
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sources
    Sources Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,330 Founders Club
    SonnyShackelford said:

    Doogles said:

    This has already been discussed, but Polk is probably the best #3 you'll see next year.

    And T Davis the best #4
    Taj, Bernard, and Jackson are all vying to be #4. It's a deep position
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NeGgaPlEaSe
    NeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,756
    Doogles said:

    This has already been discussed, but Polk is probably the best #3 you'll see next year.

    I’m just wondering how any of us can even say this to be honest. No one has seen Bernard play for Washington yet. I do remember the receivers and this offense playing like absolute shit against ASU and a few other teams without Rome on the field.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,327
    It’s because sparty sucked. Bernard barely played. I think he caught 7 balls and you’re talking about him moving past a guy that caught 41 and made some big plays in big games. Bernard didn’t do shit vs our worthless secondary either.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,671 Swaye's Wigwam
    AtomicDawg said:

    It’s because sparty sucked. Bernard barely played. I think he caught 7 balls and you’re talking about him moving past a guy that caught 41 and made some big plays in big games. Bernard didn’t do shit vs our worthless secondary either.

    Agree but MSU did have really good receivers and they don't line them up 4-5 at a time like UW. I don't think it's a slam on him that he didn't have more stats.

    Polk is fucking good though. He's not getting passed but he does seem to get banged up quite a bit. The starters come off the field a lot and it doesn't mean they aren't going to pass.
    There are enough snaps and targets in the offense to feed 6-7 wrs a decent number of catches.. I don't think anyone will be too disgruntled other than maybe the true freshmen.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,720 Founders Club
    NeGgaPlEaSe said:

    Doogles said:

    This has already been discussed, but Polk is probably the best #3 you'll see next year.

    I’m just wondering how any of us can even say this to be honest. No one has seen Bernard play for Washington yet. I do remember the receivers and this offense playing like absolute shit against ASU and a few other teams without Rome on the field.
    Polk would be WR#1 on most D1 teams. It's an extreme luxury to have him as a 3. I think Bernard fits into this offense and could potentially be better down the road, but the numbers don't lie on Polk and his chemistry with Penix is unquestioned.

    Don't fix what isn't broken.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,327
    chuck said:

    AtomicDawg said:

    It’s because sparty sucked. Bernard barely played. I think he caught 7 balls and you’re talking about him moving past a guy that caught 41 and made some big plays in big games. Bernard didn’t do shit vs our worthless secondary either.

    Agree but MSU did have really good receivers and they don't line them up 4-5 at a time like UW. I don't think it's a slam on him that he didn't have more stats.

    Polk is fucking good though. He's not getting passed but he does seem to get banged up quite a bit. The starters come off the field a lot and it doesn't mean they aren't going to pass.
    There are enough snaps and targets in the offense to feed 6-7 wrs a decent number of catches.. I don't think anyone will be too disgruntled other than maybe the true freshmen.
    Don’t disagree. I think Bernard could be good. Just hasn’t shown anything yet. This is more about Polk being under appreciated.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,671 Swaye's Wigwam
    AtomicDawg said:

    chuck said:

    AtomicDawg said:

    It’s because sparty sucked. Bernard barely played. I think he caught 7 balls and you’re talking about him moving past a guy that caught 41 and made some big plays in big games. Bernard didn’t do shit vs our worthless secondary either.

    Agree but MSU did have really good receivers and they don't line them up 4-5 at a time like UW. I don't think it's a slam on him that he didn't have more stats.

    Polk is fucking good though. He's not getting passed but he does seem to get banged up quite a bit. The starters come off the field a lot and it doesn't mean they aren't going to pass.
    There are enough snaps and targets in the offense to feed 6-7 wrs a decent number of catches.. I don't think anyone will be too disgruntled other than maybe the true freshmen.
    Don’t disagree. I think Bernard could be good. Just hasn’t shown anything yet. This is more about Polk being under appreciated.
    Yep. I think Davis is solid but could be passed. Jackson I don't care for but he gets some different looks and never seems to screw up. I think those two guys are Bernards competition though. He's not taking snaps from Polk.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    Penix and the WR & TE depth is so good it will be hard not to throw it a fuck ton. Penix was only sacked 5 times last year. The pressure they will put on the opposing D will be nothing seen on montlake before. Injuries will be the derailer if there is one this fall. Johnson and Davis will run through bus sized running lanes off of the passing game.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter