Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Anyone else old enough to remember when some asshole was claiming Tom Cotton...
SFGbob
Member Posts: 33,183
in Tug Tavern
was pushing a right-wing conspiracy theory when he claimed the virus could have come from a Chinese lab?
US officials were reportedly concerned that safety breaches at a Wuhan lab studying coronavirus in bats could cause a pandemic
https://www.businessinsider.com/us-officials-raised-alarms-about-safety-issues-in-wuhan-lab-report-2020-4
US officials were reportedly concerned that safety breaches at a Wuhan lab studying coronavirus in bats could cause a pandemic
https://www.businessinsider.com/us-officials-raised-alarms-about-safety-issues-in-wuhan-lab-report-2020-4
Comments
-
So the lab was flagged for possible safety violations
They were studying coronavirus in animals
Lab located in the city that is the epicenter of the outbreak.
Seems clear to me. You're a racist. -
And a right wing conspiracy theorist, just like that right wing rag the Washington Post.georgiaduck said:So the lab was flagged for possible safety violations
They were studying coronavirus in animals
Lab located in the city that is the epicenter of the outbreak.
Seems clear to me. You're a racist.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2020/04/14/the-washington-post-goes-rogue-china-lab-in-focus-of-coronavirus-outbreak/#5e9c19c81ee1
-
Seems clear blob craves my attention again.
Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction. -
Kenny Easley, HELP!!!HHusky said:Seems clear blob craves my attention again.
Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction. -
It doesn't matter for what purpose, the virus still came from them, and by not following proper procedures, they created a global pandemic. I think you give China two choices: Forgive some foreign debt as compensation for causing the global economic collapse, or economic sanction the fuck out of them.HHusky said:Seems clear blob craves my attention again.
Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction. -
Nope, I love exposing you for the lying piece of shit that you are. Weird how you never quote Cotton saying what you keep claiming he said.HHusky said:Seems clear blob craves my attention again.
Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.
Lying Kunts tend to do that a lot. -
He has an entire twitter conversation where he engages in saying both (1) he didn't promote the conspiracy theory and (2) that he refuses to rule it out--though science has ruled it out. In short, he's as shady as you are, blob.SFGbob said:
Nope, I love exposing you for the lying piece of shit that you are. Weird how you never quote Cotton saying what you keep claiming he said.HHusky said:Seems clear blob craves my attention again.
Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.
Lying Kunts tend to do that a lot. -
Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab? Got a link Kunt? Because the intent for which it might of been created doesn't seem to be something that can be determined by Science.HHusky said:
He has an entire twitter conversation where he engages in saying both (1) he didn't promote the conspiracy theory and (2) that he refuses to rule it out--though science has ruled it out. In short, he's as shady as you are, blob.SFGbob said:
Nope, I love exposing you for the lying piece of shit that you are. Weird how you never quote Cotton saying what you keep claiming he said.HHusky said:Seems clear blob craves my attention again.
Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.
Lying Kunts tend to do that a lot.
So you've gone from claiming Cotton "promoted" a "conspiracy theory" that it was a Chinese made bio-weapon to now admitting that he just didn't "rule it out."
And of course, you have no quotes from Cotton. -
Yes. Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab, blob.SFGbob said:
Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab? Got a link Kunt? Because the intent for which it might of been created doesn't seem to be something that can be determined by Science.HHusky said:
He has an entire twitter conversation where he engages in saying both (1) he didn't promote the conspiracy theory and (2) that he refuses to rule it out--though science has ruled it out. In short, he's as shady as you are, blob.SFGbob said:
Nope, I love exposing you for the lying piece of shit that you are. Weird how you never quote Cotton saying what you keep claiming he said.HHusky said:Seems clear blob craves my attention again.
Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.
Lying Kunts tend to do that a lot.
So you've gone from claiming Cotton "promoted" a "conspiracy theory" that it was a Chinese made bio-weapon to now admitting that he just didn't "rule it out."
And of course, you have no quotes from Cotton.
I'll leave you to parse the distinction between not eliminating a debunked conspiracy theory from consideration and promoting it.
I'm not saying you're a donkey human hybrid; I'm merely saying it's one of the possibilities. -
Do you mean like the way "science" said that it couldn't be transmitted from human to human and that it came from a Chinese meat market? Science!!!HHusky said:
Yes. Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab, blob.SFGbob said:
Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab? Got a link Kunt? Because the intent for which it might of been created doesn't seem to be something that can be determined by Science.HHusky said:
He has an entire twitter conversation where he engages in saying both (1) he didn't promote the conspiracy theory and (2) that he refuses to rule it out--though science has ruled it out. In short, he's as shady as you are, blob.SFGbob said:
Nope, I love exposing you for the lying piece of shit that you are. Weird how you never quote Cotton saying what you keep claiming he said.HHusky said:Seems clear blob craves my attention again.
Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.
Lying Kunts tend to do that a lot.
So you've gone from claiming Cotton "promoted" a "conspiracy theory" that it was a Chinese made bio-weapon to now admitting that he just didn't "rule it out."
And of course, you have no quotes from Cotton.
I'll leave you to parse the distinction between not eliminating a debunked conspiracy theory from consideration and promoting it.
I'm not saying you're a donkey human hybrid; I'm merely saying it's one of the possibilities.
Since you're too big a pathological lying piece of shit to quote Cotton here it is.
Wow, look at the way he "promoted" that theory. -
That is a small portion of his Twitter feed and not the most explicit portion.SFGbob said:
Do you mean like the way "science" said that it couldn't be transmitted from human to human and that it came from a Chinese meat market? Science!!!HHusky said:
Yes. Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab, blob.SFGbob said:
Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab? Got a link Kunt? Because the intent for which it might of been created doesn't seem to be something that can be determined by Science.HHusky said:
He has an entire twitter conversation where he engages in saying both (1) he didn't promote the conspiracy theory and (2) that he refuses to rule it out--though science has ruled it out. In short, he's as shady as you are, blob.SFGbob said:
Nope, I love exposing you for the lying piece of shit that you are. Weird how you never quote Cotton saying what you keep claiming he said.HHusky said:Seems clear blob craves my attention again.
Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.
Lying Kunts tend to do that a lot.
So you've gone from claiming Cotton "promoted" a "conspiracy theory" that it was a Chinese made bio-weapon to now admitting that he just didn't "rule it out."
And of course, you have no quotes from Cotton.
I'll leave you to parse the distinction between not eliminating a debunked conspiracy theory from consideration and promoting it.
I'm not saying you're a donkey human hybrid; I'm merely saying it's one of the possibilities.
Since you're too big a pathological lying piece of shit to quote Cotton here it is.
Wow, look at the way he "promoted" that theory. -
Yes, yes Kunt. The quotes you won't post.HHusky said:
That is a small portion of his Twitter feed and not the most explicit portion.SFGbob said:
Do you mean like the way "science" said that it couldn't be transmitted from human to human and that it came from a Chinese meat market? Science!!!HHusky said:
Yes. Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab, blob.SFGbob said:
Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab? Got a link Kunt? Because the intent for which it might of been created doesn't seem to be something that can be determined by Science.HHusky said:
He has an entire twitter conversation where he engages in saying both (1) he didn't promote the conspiracy theory and (2) that he refuses to rule it out--though science has ruled it out. In short, he's as shady as you are, blob.SFGbob said:
Nope, I love exposing you for the lying piece of shit that you are. Weird how you never quote Cotton saying what you keep claiming he said.HHusky said:Seems clear blob craves my attention again.
Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.
Lying Kunts tend to do that a lot.
So you've gone from claiming Cotton "promoted" a "conspiracy theory" that it was a Chinese made bio-weapon to now admitting that he just didn't "rule it out."
And of course, you have no quotes from Cotton.
I'll leave you to parse the distinction between not eliminating a debunked conspiracy theory from consideration and promoting it.
I'm not saying you're a donkey human hybrid; I'm merely saying it's one of the possibilities.
Since you're too big a pathological lying piece of shit to quote Cotton here it is.
Wow, look at the way he "promoted" that theory. -
I know you're playing stupid word games with "created" versus "originated." But not ruled out.HHusky said:
Yes. Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab, blob.SFGbob said:
Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab? Got a link Kunt? Because the intent for which it might of been created doesn't seem to be something that can be determined by Science.HHusky said:
He has an entire twitter conversation where he engages in saying both (1) he didn't promote the conspiracy theory and (2) that he refuses to rule it out--though science has ruled it out. In short, he's as shady as you are, blob.SFGbob said:
Nope, I love exposing you for the lying piece of shit that you are. Weird how you never quote Cotton saying what you keep claiming he said.HHusky said:Seems clear blob craves my attention again.
Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.
Lying Kunts tend to do that a lot.
So you've gone from claiming Cotton "promoted" a "conspiracy theory" that it was a Chinese made bio-weapon to now admitting that he just didn't "rule it out."
And of course, you have no quotes from Cotton.
I'll leave you to parse the distinction between not eliminating a debunked conspiracy theory from consideration and promoting it.
I'm not saying you're a donkey human hybrid; I'm merely saying it's one of the possibilities.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/04/14/coronavirus-chinese-lab-inconclusive-186408 -
Why do we fund our enemy? Why are Chinese scientists in our research labs all over the country? Why are we allowing them to steal everything?
Follow the money.... -
It didn’t start in a lab. Everyone says so. 97% or all scientists agree
-
Trump said something nice about China in a tweet onceMikeDamone said:It didn’t start in a lab. Everyone says so. 97% or all scientists agree
-
I'm not saying you have Chinese sperm dribbling off your chin; I'm merely saying it's one of the possibilities.HHusky said:
Yes. Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab, blob.SFGbob said:
Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab? Got a link Kunt? Because the intent for which it might of been created doesn't seem to be something that can be determined by Science.HHusky said:
He has an entire twitter conversation where he engages in saying both (1) he didn't promote the conspiracy theory and (2) that he refuses to rule it out--though science has ruled it out. In short, he's as shady as you are, blob.SFGbob said:
Nope, I love exposing you for the lying piece of shit that you are. Weird how you never quote Cotton saying what you keep claiming he said.HHusky said:Seems clear blob craves my attention again.
Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.
Lying Kunts tend to do that a lot.
So you've gone from claiming Cotton "promoted" a "conspiracy theory" that it was a Chinese made bio-weapon to now admitting that he just didn't "rule it out."
And of course, you have no quotes from Cotton.
I'll leave you to parse the distinction between not eliminating a debunked conspiracy theory from consideration and promoting it.
I'm not saying you're a donkey human hybrid; I'm merely saying it's one of the possibilities.
More like probability but that's venturing into maff turf and we all know how that ends for the Dazzler.
-
the bad news is this kind of stuff throws my 'I bite the head off a bat and the world collapsed' theory
-
Best evidence is that it wasn't bioengineered but best evidence is that it did escape from the chicom biolab. The counselor thinks that is just swell and just needs 75k more dead Americans to win some chicom prize money.
-
WSJ OpEd: Coronavirus and the Laboratories in Wuhan
While the Chinese government denies the possibility of a lab leak, its actions tell a different story. The Chinese military posted its top epidemiologist to the Institute of Virology in January. In February Chairman Xi Jinping urged swift implementation of new biosafety rules to govern pathogens in laboratory settings. Academic papers about the virus’s origins are now subject to prior restraint by the government.
In early January, enforcers threatened doctors who warned their colleagues about the virus. Among them was Li Wenliang, who died of Covid-19 in February. Laboratories working to sequence the virus’s genetic code were ordered to destroy their samples. The laboratory that first published the virus’s genome was shut down, Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post reported in February.
This evidence is circumstantial, to be sure, but it all points toward the Wuhan labs. Thanks to the Chinese coverup, we may never have direct, conclusive evidence—intelligence rarely works that way—but Americans justifiably can use common sense to follow the inherent logic of events to their likely conclusion.
Mr. Cotton, a Republican, is a U.S. senator from Arkansas. -
Right-wing, crack pot conspiracy theorist.GrundleStiltzkin said:WSJ OpEd: Coronavirus and the Laboratories in Wuhan
While the Chinese government denies the possibility of a lab leak, its actions tell a different story. The Chinese military posted its top epidemiologist to the Institute of Virology in January. In February Chairman Xi Jinping urged swift implementation of new biosafety rules to govern pathogens in laboratory settings. Academic papers about the virus’s origins are now subject to prior restraint by the government.
In early January, enforcers threatened doctors who warned their colleagues about the virus. Among them was Li Wenliang, who died of Covid-19 in February. Laboratories working to sequence the virus’s genetic code were ordered to destroy their samples. The laboratory that first published the virus’s genome was shut down, Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post reported in February.
This evidence is circumstantial, to be sure, but it all points toward the Wuhan labs. Thanks to the Chinese coverup, we may never have direct, conclusive evidence—intelligence rarely works that way—but Americans justifiably can use common sense to follow the inherent logic of events to their likely conclusion.
Mr. Cotton, a Republican, is a U.S. senator from Arkansas. -
What is with people on the Left with no scientific background or knowledge and attempting to invoke "science" as if their arguments were at all based in science?
-
Climate changeUW_Doog_Bot said:What is with people on the Left with no scientific background or knowledge and attempting to invoke "science" as if their arguments were at all based in science?
-
Leftists love the conceit that all of their beliefs are fact and science based.UW_Doog_Bot said:What is with people on the Left with no scientific background or knowledge and attempting to invoke "science" as if their arguments were at all based in science?
-
"It's science!" is pretty much the refrain of people poorly versed in how wildly variable scientific modeling actually is. Nothing like having someone with a liberal arts degree lecturing me about exponential equations or peer review.SFGbob said:
Leftists love the conceit that all of their beliefs are fact and science based.UW_Doog_Bot said:What is with people on the Left with no scientific background or knowledge and attempting to invoke "science" as if their arguments were at all based in science?
-
We can tax our way out of the China 19 virus! Works for climate change.....RaceBannon said:
Climate changeUW_Doog_Bot said:What is with people on the Left with no scientific background or knowledge and attempting to invoke "science" as if their arguments were at all based in science?
-
Seems bump worthy.HHusky said:
Yes. Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab, blob.SFGbob said:
Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab? Got a link Kunt? Because the intent for which it might of been created doesn't seem to be something that can be determined by Science.HHusky said:
He has an entire twitter conversation where he engages in saying both (1) he didn't promote the conspiracy theory and (2) that he refuses to rule it out--though science has ruled it out. In short, he's as shady as you are, blob.SFGbob said:
Nope, I love exposing you for the lying piece of shit that you are. Weird how you never quote Cotton saying what you keep claiming he said.HHusky said:Seems clear blob craves my attention again.
Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.
Lying Kunts tend to do that a lot.
So you've gone from claiming Cotton "promoted" a "conspiracy theory" that it was a Chinese made bio-weapon to now admitting that he just didn't "rule it out."
And of course, you have no quotes from Cotton.
I'll leave you to parse the distinction between not eliminating a debunked conspiracy theory from consideration and promoting it.
I'm not saying you're a donkey human hybrid; I'm merely saying it's one of the possibilities. -
Does the lying fucking hack ever get anything right?Bob_C said:
Seems bump worthy.HHusky said:
Yes. Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab, blob.SFGbob said:
Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab? Got a link Kunt? Because the intent for which it might of been created doesn't seem to be something that can be determined by Science.HHusky said:
He has an entire twitter conversation where he engages in saying both (1) he didn't promote the conspiracy theory and (2) that he refuses to rule it out--though science has ruled it out. In short, he's as shady as you are, blob.SFGbob said:
Nope, I love exposing you for the lying piece of shit that you are. Weird how you never quote Cotton saying what you keep claiming he said.HHusky said:Seems clear blob craves my attention again.
Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.
Lying Kunts tend to do that a lot.
So you've gone from claiming Cotton "promoted" a "conspiracy theory" that it was a Chinese made bio-weapon to now admitting that he just didn't "rule it out."
And of course, you have no quotes from Cotton.
I'll leave you to parse the distinction between not eliminating a debunked conspiracy theory from consideration and promoting it.
I'm not saying you're a donkey human hybrid; I'm merely saying it's one of the possibilities. -
@heilhusky getting absolutely bodied in this thread.
1) called out for useless word semantics @GrundleStiltzkin
2) vaguely cites to Cotton - explicit contradictory evidence provided @SFGbob
3) called out for hailmary attempt to save face by claiming the boogyman "science" somehow "proved" something, no evidence, examples, or explanation provided @UW_Doog_Bot
That about cover it?
-
Sources said:
@heilhusky getting absolutely bodied in this thread.
1) called out for useless word semantics @GrundleStiltzkin
2) vaguely cites to Cotton - explicit contradictory evidence provided @SFGbob
3) called out for hailmary attempt to save face by claiming the boogyman "science" somehow "proved" something, no evidence, examples, or explanation provided @UW_Doog_Bot
That about cover it?
