Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Oregon & SC
46XiJCAB
Member Posts: 20,967
The only two PAC-12 schools with at least 10 players in the NFL playoffs.
Iowa has 17, impressive.
LSU leads with 24, UGA 23.
Iowa has 17, impressive.
LSU leads with 24, UGA 23.
Comments
-
Which NFL team is Huard playing for?
-
Shows how much the schools have underperformed
-
There are 19 schools with 10 or more. SEC leads with 7. B1G with 5, PAC, ACC and Big 12 with 2, and ND. The usual suspects from each conference.
-
Link?
-
meaningless stat
par for the course in this dump -
It’s only a “dump” because of all the Husky trolls spewing bullshit, i.e., You, Haie, Fire the Janitor, Benny the Snitch/Bitch, the DB Cooper wannabe et al.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:meaningless stat
par for the course in this dump
-
https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/college/
Active NFL players:
Oregon 26
Washington 32
What's the point again? -
There's never a point in the Refuge.Doogles said:https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/college/
Active NFL players:
Oregon 26
Washington 32
What's the point again? -
DB Cooper Wannabe 😂trublue said:
It’s only a “dump” because of all the Husky trolls spewing bullshit, i.e., You, Haie, Fire the Janitor, Benny the Snitch/Bitch, the DB Cooper wannabe et al.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:meaningless stat
par for the course in this dump -
Amazing how a simple fact based poast can trigger you soft assed babies.
JFC. You remind me of DM Bitches. -
It seemed pretty apparent. I can’t believe how soft you HH vets have become over here.Doogles said:https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/college/
Active NFL players:
Oregon 26
Washington 32
What's the point again? -
“Meaningless stat” I’m told. Now it’s a doog jackpot.Doogles said:https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/college/
Active NFL players:
Oregon 26
Washington 32
What's the point again?
Can’t even hold it together in one thread.
UWetzles Pretzels. -
I'm just trying to help you out. You're inferring Oregon is holding the flag for the PAC in NFL representation, yet you're way down the list.46XiJCAB said:There are 19 schools with 10 or more. SEC leads with 7. B1G with 5, PAC, ACC and Big 12 with 2, and ND. The usual suspects from each conference.
UW #1 in PAC, 12th in the country.
The usual suspects, lol -
If you look at the 19 teams represented you'll find a similar thread. Not my problem it makes uw fans all ass hurt. I thought HH was filled with non-soft poasters. Maybe I've been wrong. Fuck or dear if I went over to Hardcore and cried like this I'd get laughed off the bored.Doogles said:
I'm just trying to help you out. You're inferring Oregon is holding the flag for the PAC in NFL representation, yet you're way down the list.46XiJCAB said:There are 19 schools with 10 or more. SEC leads with 7. B1G with 5, PAC, ACC and Big 12 with 2, and ND. The usual suspects from each conference.
UW #1 in PAC, 12th in the country.
The usual suspects, lol -
Stick to the Tug, you struggle out here.46XiJCAB said:
If you look at the 19 teams represented you'll find a similar thread. Not my problem it makes uw fans all ass hurt. I thought HH was filled with non-soft poasters. Maybe I've been wrong. Fuck or dear if I went over to Hardcore and cried like this I'd get laughed off the bored.Doogles said:
I'm just trying to help you out. You're inferring Oregon is holding the flag for the PAC in NFL representation, yet you're way down the list.46XiJCAB said:There are 19 schools with 10 or more. SEC leads with 7. B1G with 5, PAC, ACC and Big 12 with 2, and ND. The usual suspects from each conference.
UW #1 in PAC, 12th in the country.
The usual suspects, lol -
I'm not responsible for your feelers over here. It was a stat with the usual suspects. You'll be okay. I promise. The only "struggling" taking place over here is coming for soft assed uw poasters.Doogles said:
Stick to the Tug, you struggle out here.46XiJCAB said:
If you look at the 19 teams represented you'll find a similar thread. Not my problem it makes uw fans all ass hurt. I thought HH was filled with non-soft poasters. Maybe I've been wrong. Fuck or dear if I went over to Hardcore and cried like this I'd get laughed off the bored.Doogles said:
I'm just trying to help you out. You're inferring Oregon is holding the flag for the PAC in NFL representation, yet you're way down the list.46XiJCAB said:There are 19 schools with 10 or more. SEC leads with 7. B1G with 5, PAC, ACC and Big 12 with 2, and ND. The usual suspects from each conference.
UW #1 in PAC, 12th in the country.
The usual suspects, lol -
*implying.Doogles said:
I'm just trying to help you out. You're inferring Oregon is holding the flag for the PAC in NFL representation, yet you're way down the list.46XiJCAB said:There are 19 schools with 10 or more. SEC leads with 7. B1G with 5, PAC, ACC and Big 12 with 2, and ND. The usual suspects from each conference.
UW #1 in PAC, 12th in the country.
The usual suspects, lol
I look at bonafide starters. I think UW has 17 who are first on the chart - counting Peters, who seems to want nothing to do with W and wants y'all to get him off y'all's page - and Oregon has 10. Of course, these things are fluid. Today's starters are tomorrow's backups, etc. It also technically includes a punt returner and two nickel backs for Washington as well as a few Ducks who were starters at one point in their careers and are now 2nd on the depth chart. Both teams have some clear and some up-and-coming studs. Both teams also have their share of busts and surprises.
The other thing about this measure is the number of guys who were good, but not great, in college, who go on to be fantastic in the NFL. How do you count them? As Miami has had a bunch of those over the years, I tend to ignore them because they didn't help make me happy when they had the chance. -
Thanks for the link. 9 UW players on playoff teams. 1 less than the Ducks. If only we could have a QB in the playoffs to shit down his pants in front of the world and lose a 27-0 lead, we could be their equal.Doogles said:https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/college/
Active NFL players:
Oregon 26
Washington 32
What's the point again? -
I didn’t realize the amount of tears that would flow over this. I hope each of you is going to be okay. Let me know if I can help in your recovery.FireTheJanitor said:
Thanks for the link. 9 UW players on playoff teams. 1 less than the Ducks. If only we could have a QB in the playoffs to shit down his pants in front of the world and lose a 27-0 lead, we could be their equal.Doogles said:https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/college/
Active NFL players:
Oregon 26
Washington 32
What's the point again?
I care. -
Missing tons of chromosomes46XiJCAB said:
I didn’t realize the amount of tears that would flow over this. I hope each of you is going to be okay. Let me know if I can help in your recovery.FireTheJanitor said:
Thanks for the link. 9 UW players on playoff teams. 1 less than the Ducks. If only we could have a QB in the playoffs to shit down his pants in front of the world and lose a 27-0 lead, we could be their equal.Doogles said:https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/college/
Active NFL players:
Oregon 26
Washington 32
What's the point again?
I care. -
He didn't exactly shit down his pants. He had a fine game statistically and didn't turn the ball over. 23 rushes for 67 yards, and some brutal penalties, really helped the cause. If he threw a bunch of picks that's another matter. Burrow has an even less productive game and his team won. That's football.FireTheJanitor said:
Thanks for the link. 9 UW players on playoff teams. 1 less than the Ducks. If only we could have a QB in the playoffs to shit down his pants in front of the world and lose a 27-0 lead, we could be their equal.Doogles said:https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/college/
Active NFL players:
Oregon 26
Washington 32
What's the point again?
-
creepycoug said:
*implying.Doogles said:
I'm just trying to help you out. You're inferring Oregon is holding the flag for the PAC in NFL representation, yet you're way down the list.46XiJCAB said:There are 19 schools with 10 or more. SEC leads with 7. B1G with 5, PAC, ACC and Big 12 with 2, and ND. The usual suspects from each conference.
UW #1 in PAC, 12th in the country.
The usual suspects, lol
I look at bonafide starters. I think UW has 17 who are first on the chart - counting Peters, who seems to want nothing to do with W and wants y'all to get him off y'all's page - and Oregon has 10. Of course, these things are fluid. Today's starters are tomorrow's backups, etc. It also technically includes a punt returner and two nickel backs for Washington as well as a few Ducks who were starters at one point in their careers and are now 2nd on the depth chart. Both teams have some clear and some up-and-coming studs. Both teams also have their share of busts and surprises.
The other thing about this measure is the number of guys who were good, but not great, in college, who go on to be fantastic in the NFL. How do you count them? As Miami has had a bunch of those over the years, I tend to ignore them because they didn't help make me happy when they had the chance.
Ben Davidson comes to the Varsity Alumni game. I ask my dad - he played for Washington?
My dad - not much
If you know Davidson and Owens that isn't too surprising
-
ON the other hand pretty boy shit the bed with 4 picks and big dicked it all the way back with 4 TD throwscreepycoug said:
He didn't exactly shit down his pants. He had a fine game statistically and didn't turn the ball over. 23 rushes for 67 yards, and some brutal penalties, really helped the cause. If he threw a bunch of picks that's another matter. Burrow has an even less productive game and his team won. That's football.FireTheJanitor said:
Thanks for the link. 9 UW players on playoff teams. 1 less than the Ducks. If only we could have a QB in the playoffs to shit down his pants in front of the world and lose a 27-0 lead, we could be their equal.Doogles said:https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/college/
Active NFL players:
Oregon 26
Washington 32
What's the point again?
Herbert is a pussy and not a winner
Because winners win
Playing for the Chargers is a mitigating factor. Like playing for the Falcons or Ducks -
FTJ likes his false narrative better. He’s coping right now. LIPO for him.creepycoug said:
He didn't exactly shit down his pants. He had a fine game statistically and didn't turn the ball over. 23 rushes for 67 yards, and some brutal penalties, really helped the cause. If he threw a bunch of picks that's another matter. Burrow has an even less productive game and his team won. That's football.FireTheJanitor said:
Thanks for the link. 9 UW players on playoff teams. 1 less than the Ducks. If only we could have a QB in the playoffs to shit down his pants in front of the world and lose a 27-0 lead, we could be their equal.Doogles said:https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/college/
Active NFL players:
Oregon 26
Washington 32
What's the point again? -
I had to use terminology that maybe 46 would understand, my apologies.creepycoug said:
He didn't exactly shit down his pants. He had a fine game statistically and didn't turn the ball over. 23 rushes for 67 yards, and some brutal penalties, really helped the cause. If he threw a bunch of picks that's another matter. Burrow has an even less productive game and his team won. That's football.FireTheJanitor said:
Thanks for the link. 9 UW players on playoff teams. 1 less than the Ducks. If only we could have a QB in the playoffs to shit down his pants in front of the world and lose a 27-0 lead, we could be their equal.Doogles said:https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/college/
Active NFL players:
Oregon 26
Washington 32
What's the point again?
He was decent but the Jags also spotted them 5 turnovers in a half. He missed some throws around the goal line that he’d like to have back, the one to Allen with 4 mins left in the 2nd sticks out. Same with a screen to Ekeler late on a big 3rd down, he sailed it. He was fine but still the QB of a team that lost a game 99% of teams don’t lose so he gets the potshots. I’m sure 46 will fluff him back in Eugene this offseason regardless. -
Race of the rails is my favorite Race.RaceBannon said:
ON the other hand pretty boy shit the bed with 4 picks and big dicked it all the way back with 4 TD throwscreepycoug said:
He didn't exactly shit down his pants. He had a fine game statistically and didn't turn the ball over. 23 rushes for 67 yards, and some brutal penalties, really helped the cause. If he threw a bunch of picks that's another matter. Burrow has an even less productive game and his team won. That's football.FireTheJanitor said:
Thanks for the link. 9 UW players on playoff teams. 1 less than the Ducks. If only we could have a QB in the playoffs to shit down his pants in front of the world and lose a 27-0 lead, we could be their equal.Doogles said:https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/college/
Active NFL players:
Oregon 26
Washington 32
What's the point again?
Herbert is a pussy and not a winner
Because winners win
Playing for the Chargers is a mitigating factor. Like playing for the Falcons or Ducks
-
So your original poast made no sense thus the cleanup. Thanks for at least affirming mine.FireTheJanitor said:
I had to use terminology that maybe 46 would understand, my apologies.creepycoug said:
He didn't exactly shit down his pants. He had a fine game statistically and didn't turn the ball over. 23 rushes for 67 yards, and some brutal penalties, really helped the cause. If he threw a bunch of picks that's another matter. Burrow has an even less productive game and his team won. That's football.FireTheJanitor said:
Thanks for the link. 9 UW players on playoff teams. 1 less than the Ducks. If only we could have a QB in the playoffs to shit down his pants in front of the world and lose a 27-0 lead, we could be their equal.Doogles said:https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/college/
Active NFL players:
Oregon 26
Washington 32
What's the point again?
He was decent but the Jags also spotted them 5 turnovers in a half. He missed some throws around the goal line that he’d like to have back, the one to Allen with 4 mins left in the 2nd sticks out. Same with a screen to Ekeler late on a big 3rd down, he sailed it. He was fine but still the QB of a team that lost a game 99% of teams don’t lose so he gets the potshots. I’m sure 46 will fluff him back in Eugene this offseason regardless.
My favorite FTJ. -
And suddenly the stat matters. What a shocker.FireTheJanitor said:
Thanks for the link. 9 UW players on playoff teams. 1 less than the Ducks. If only we could have a QB in the playoffs to shit down his pants in front of the world and lose a 27-0 lead, we could be their equal.Doogles said:https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/college/
Active NFL players:
Oregon 26
Washington 32
What's the point again? -
That’s not what I said dumb quook. I knew there was the standard retarded splitting of the hairs by 46 going on so I looked. I was right. Eat more cock.MikeSeaver said:
And suddenly the stat matters. What a shocker.FireTheJanitor said:
Thanks for the link. 9 UW players on playoff teams. 1 less than the Ducks. If only we could have a QB in the playoffs to shit down his pants in front of the world and lose a 27-0 lead, we could be their equal.Doogles said:https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/college/
Active NFL players:
Oregon 26
Washington 32
What's the point again? -
The fact that you had to run and find the number because uw missed the cut, was my reward.FireTheJanitor said:
That’s not what I said dumb quook. I knew there was the standard retarded splitting of the hairs by 46 going on so I looked. I was right. Eat more cock.MikeSeaver said:
And suddenly the stat matters. What a shocker.FireTheJanitor said:
Thanks for the link. 9 UW players on playoff teams. 1 less than the Ducks. If only we could have a QB in the playoffs to shit down his pants in front of the world and lose a 27-0 lead, we could be their equal.Doogles said:https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/college/
Active NFL players:
Oregon 26
Washington 32
What's the point again?
Thank you!
