Oregon & SC
Comments
-
It seemed pretty apparent. I can’t believe how soft you HH vets have become over here.Doogles said:https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/college/
Active NFL players:
Oregon 26
Washington 32
What's the point again? -
“Meaningless stat” I’m told. Now it’s a doog jackpot.Doogles said:https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/college/
Active NFL players:
Oregon 26
Washington 32
What's the point again?

Can’t even hold it together in one thread.
UWetzles Pretzels. -
I'm just trying to help you out. You're inferring Oregon is holding the flag for the PAC in NFL representation, yet you're way down the list.46XiJCAB said:There are 19 schools with 10 or more. SEC leads with 7. B1G with 5, PAC, ACC and Big 12 with 2, and ND. The usual suspects from each conference.
UW #1 in PAC, 12th in the country.
The usual suspects, lol -
If you look at the 19 teams represented you'll find a similar thread. Not my problem it makes uw fans all ass hurt. I thought HH was filled with non-soft poasters. Maybe I've been wrong. Fuck or dear if I went over to Hardcore and cried like this I'd get laughed off the bored.Doogles said:
I'm just trying to help you out. You're inferring Oregon is holding the flag for the PAC in NFL representation, yet you're way down the list.46XiJCAB said:There are 19 schools with 10 or more. SEC leads with 7. B1G with 5, PAC, ACC and Big 12 with 2, and ND. The usual suspects from each conference.
UW #1 in PAC, 12th in the country.
The usual suspects, lol -
Stick to the Tug, you struggle out here.46XiJCAB said:
If you look at the 19 teams represented you'll find a similar thread. Not my problem it makes uw fans all ass hurt. I thought HH was filled with non-soft poasters. Maybe I've been wrong. Fuck or dear if I went over to Hardcore and cried like this I'd get laughed off the bored.Doogles said:
I'm just trying to help you out. You're inferring Oregon is holding the flag for the PAC in NFL representation, yet you're way down the list.46XiJCAB said:There are 19 schools with 10 or more. SEC leads with 7. B1G with 5, PAC, ACC and Big 12 with 2, and ND. The usual suspects from each conference.
UW #1 in PAC, 12th in the country.
The usual suspects, lol -
I'm not responsible for your feelers over here. It was a stat with the usual suspects. You'll be okay. I promise. The only "struggling" taking place over here is coming for soft assed uw poasters.Doogles said:
Stick to the Tug, you struggle out here.46XiJCAB said:
If you look at the 19 teams represented you'll find a similar thread. Not my problem it makes uw fans all ass hurt. I thought HH was filled with non-soft poasters. Maybe I've been wrong. Fuck or dear if I went over to Hardcore and cried like this I'd get laughed off the bored.Doogles said:
I'm just trying to help you out. You're inferring Oregon is holding the flag for the PAC in NFL representation, yet you're way down the list.46XiJCAB said:There are 19 schools with 10 or more. SEC leads with 7. B1G with 5, PAC, ACC and Big 12 with 2, and ND. The usual suspects from each conference.
UW #1 in PAC, 12th in the country.
The usual suspects, lol -
*implying.Doogles said:
I'm just trying to help you out. You're inferring Oregon is holding the flag for the PAC in NFL representation, yet you're way down the list.46XiJCAB said:There are 19 schools with 10 or more. SEC leads with 7. B1G with 5, PAC, ACC and Big 12 with 2, and ND. The usual suspects from each conference.
UW #1 in PAC, 12th in the country.
The usual suspects, lol
I look at bonafide starters. I think UW has 17 who are first on the chart - counting Peters, who seems to want nothing to do with W and wants y'all to get him off y'all's page - and Oregon has 10. Of course, these things are fluid. Today's starters are tomorrow's backups, etc. It also technically includes a punt returner and two nickel backs for Washington as well as a few Ducks who were starters at one point in their careers and are now 2nd on the depth chart. Both teams have some clear and some up-and-coming studs. Both teams also have their share of busts and surprises.
The other thing about this measure is the number of guys who were good, but not great, in college, who go on to be fantastic in the NFL. How do you count them? As Miami has had a bunch of those over the years, I tend to ignore them because they didn't help make me happy when they had the chance. -
Thanks for the link. 9 UW players on playoff teams. 1 less than the Ducks. If only we could have a QB in the playoffs to shit down his pants in front of the world and lose a 27-0 lead, we could be their equal.Doogles said:https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/college/
Active NFL players:
Oregon 26
Washington 32
What's the point again? -
I didn’t realize the amount of tears that would flow over this. I hope each of you is going to be okay. Let me know if I can help in your recovery.FireTheJanitor said:
Thanks for the link. 9 UW players on playoff teams. 1 less than the Ducks. If only we could have a QB in the playoffs to shit down his pants in front of the world and lose a 27-0 lead, we could be their equal.Doogles said:https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/college/
Active NFL players:
Oregon 26
Washington 32
What's the point again?
I care. -
Missing tons of chromosomes46XiJCAB said:
I didn’t realize the amount of tears that would flow over this. I hope each of you is going to be okay. Let me know if I can help in your recovery.FireTheJanitor said:
Thanks for the link. 9 UW players on playoff teams. 1 less than the Ducks. If only we could have a QB in the playoffs to shit down his pants in front of the world and lose a 27-0 lead, we could be their equal.Doogles said:https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/college/
Active NFL players:
Oregon 26
Washington 32
What's the point again?
I care.



