Guys, it was only 10 documents.

RaceBannon said:

Sloppy but not criminal

Jfc what a cock sucking idiot

Madam, I'm not saying no one will be charged. Sloppy was by contrast to willful.

georgiaduck said:

show previous quotes

HHusky said:

georgiaduck said:

HHusky said:

Inexcusable clown show by Biden.

Still not meaningfully comparable to Daddy’s intentional and willful law breaking, but I’d never set the bar that low . . . unlike the gals here.

Special counsel has been appointed. One less whataboutism for the TugHens.

Inexcusable- Until he makes the excuse that's it doesn't compare to Trump. Perry Mason, Matlock, and Joe Namath all wrapped into one body.

The incompetence and/or sheer sloppiness are inexcusable. They still don't compare to willful criminality very well. That's not an excuse, however. I blame your education.

And you gals were the first to draw the comparison. It's beyond dishonest of you to complain of making the comparison now.

You're off to a good start using incompetence to describe the administration. Sloppiness is the argument Sam Bankman-Fried is putting out there. Make sure that's the focal point of your defense.

Was Biden keeping track of his docs using QuickBooks?

Unlike with Daddy, we don't know who packed the boxes. The buck still stops with Biden. Aides? Staffers? Intentional? Careless? Doesn't matter. Inexcusable no matter what.

See how easy that was?

pawz said:

show previous quotes

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

Sloppy but not criminal

Jfc what a cock sucking idiot

Madam, I'm not saying no one will be charged. Sloppy was by contrast to willful.

"Willful" in your words, had the benefit of legal privilege.

A real lawyer would understand this poont. Dumb motherfucker.

Bull fucking shit.

/s/ A real lawyer

georgiaduck said:

show previous quotes

AOG said:

How long do you assholes predict before impeachment in House?

show previous quotes

HHusky said:

georgiaduck said:

HHusky said:

georgiaduck said:

HHusky said:

Inexcusable clown show by Biden.

Still not meaningfully comparable to Daddy’s intentional and willful law breaking, but I’d never set the bar that low . . . unlike the gals here.

Special counsel has been appointed. One less whataboutism for the TugHens.

Inexcusable- Until he makes the excuse that's it doesn't compare to Trump. Perry Mason, Matlock, and Joe Namath all wrapped into one body.

The incompetence and/or sheer sloppiness are inexcusable. They still don't compare to willful criminality very well. That's not an excuse, however. I blame your education.

And you gals were the first to draw the comparison. It's beyond dishonest of you to complain of making the comparison now.

You're off to a good start using incompetence to describe the administration. Sloppiness is the argument Sam Bankman-Fried is putting out there. Make sure that's the focal point of your defense.

Was Biden keeping track of his docs using QuickBooks?

Unlike with Daddy, we don't know who packed the boxes. The buck still stops with Biden. Aides? Staffers? Intentional? Careless? Doesn't matter. Inexcusable no matter what.

See how easy that was?

Look at Lionel pat himself on the back for pointing out Biden's neglectfulness- while telling us it's not like Trump (even though new data points pop up daily).

I tell ya, the bravery on display here is second only to his hero Michael Avenatti

I was familiar with Avenatti's corruption when you were just a little girl in short pants.

pawz said:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_B_qee6pG0U&t=1229s

show previous quotes

HHusky said:

pawz said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

Sloppy but not criminal

Jfc what a cock sucking idiot

Madam, I'm not saying no one will be charged. Sloppy was by contrast to willful.

"Willful" in your words, had the benefit of legal privilege.

A real lawyer would understand this poont. Dumb motherfucker.

Bull fucking shit.

/s/ A real lawyer

POTUS - Legal authority to declassify ANY document(s) at their sole discretion.

DJT - Had a standing EO that ANY document(s) he removed from Oval was automatically declassified.

SCOTUS - Affirmed POTUS' privilege in a case related to Bill Clinton.


Are you naturally this fucking dumb or do you work at it?

Also, you never told us? how much you paid for that bridge.

Not to ignore that pantload you just treated us to, but classification is irrelevant to an Espionage Act charge.

HHusky said:

show previous quotes

georgiaduck said:

AOG said:

How long do you assholes predict before impeachment in House?

HHusky said:

georgiaduck said:

HHusky said:

georgiaduck said:

HHusky said:

Inexcusable clown show by Biden.

Still not meaningfully comparable to Daddy’s intentional and willful law breaking, but I’d never set the bar that low . . . unlike the gals here.

Special counsel has been appointed. One less whataboutism for the TugHens.

Inexcusable- Until he makes the excuse that's it doesn't compare to Trump. Perry Mason, Matlock, and Joe Namath all wrapped into one body.

The incompetence and/or sheer sloppiness are inexcusable. They still don't compare to willful criminality very well. That's not an excuse, however. I blame your education.

And you gals were the first to draw the comparison. It's beyond dishonest of you to complain of making the comparison now.

You're off to a good start using incompetence to describe the administration. Sloppiness is the argument Sam Bankman-Fried is putting out there. Make sure that's the focal point of your defense.

Was Biden keeping track of his docs using QuickBooks?

Unlike with Daddy, we don't know who packed the boxes. The buck still stops with Biden. Aides? Staffers? Intentional? Careless? Doesn't matter. Inexcusable no matter what.

See how easy that was?

Look at Lionel pat himself on the back for pointing out Biden's neglectfulness- while telling us it's not like Trump (even though new data points pop up daily).

I tell ya, the bravery on display here is second only to his hero Michael Avenatti

I was familiar with Avenatti's corruption when you were just a little girl in short pants.

Dazzler watched the Pepsi/Jet documentary on Netflix!!!

Lol he left them in his garage?

Bob_C said:

show previous quotes

AOG said:

How long do you assholes predict before impeachment in House?

It would be a mistake to do so. This is Biden's sexual harassment charges instead of dead people in nursing homes moment.

It's impossible we have seen to actually be removed from office, even if you orchestrate an armed mob to install yourself as dictator. Given that impeachment then is just for a show, I don't see what is stopping it with these secret documents in a garage.

AOG said:

show previous quotes

Bob_C said:

AOG said:

How long do you assholes predict before impeachment in House?

It would be a mistake to do so. This is Biden's sexual harassment charges instead of dead people in nursing homes moment.

It's impossible we have seen to actually be removed from office, even if you orchestrate an armed mob to install yourself as dictator. Given that impeachment then is just for a show, I don't see what is stopping it with these secret documents in a garage.

Tough to be removed from an office you don't hold. Perhaps AOG could explain that to us, but then that would leave him mentally damaged and we wouldn't want him to hurt himself.

PS I don't remember the mob being armed. But I do remember Ray Epps inciting protestors to "Go into the Capitol". Have it on video. While AOG is trying to fire up his brain, he could point to where non-FBI collaborator Trump incited the non-armed mob to enter the Capitol.

HHusky said:

show previous quotes

pawz said:

HHusky said:

Time for a special master.

obviously

any doubt how Daddy would deal with this? ("I declassified them in my mind.")

You have daddy issues. Pathetic.

You think all of Daddy's stolen documents will ever be discovered?

This only happened because Biden's own people have been searching and self-reporting.

Have you stopped to ask yourself why they're magically discovering stuff on their own? Biden is facing a coup from his own team.