Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

As Huskies Stock Up on Running Backs for 2023, We Rank Them

1235»

Comments

  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 69,920 Founders Club
    If teams can line up with 5 wide receivers, why can't UW line up with 5 running backs. Why not revolutionize the game.
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,807 Founders Club
    edited January 2023

    If teams can line up with 5 wide receivers, why can't UW line up with 5 running backs. Why not revolutionize the game.

    You could have a backline like rugby.


    If you taught players to run trailers on every play you would have a never ending option down the field. Would actually be pretty hard to stop if mastered, but you'd also have like 6 fumbles/game.
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 69,920 Founders Club
    Doogles said:

    If teams can line up with 5 wide receivers, why can't UW line up with 5 running backs. Why not revolutionize the game.

    You could have a backline like rugby.


    If you taught players to run trailers on every play you would have a never ending option down the field. Would actually be pretty hard to stop if mastered, but you'd also have like 6 fumbles/game.
    Nothing like seeing nine defenders on the line of scrimmage
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,807 Founders Club
    edited January 2023

    Doogles said:

    If teams can line up with 5 wide receivers, why can't UW line up with 5 running backs. Why not revolutionize the game.

    You could have a backline like rugby.


    If you taught players to run trailers on every play you would have a never ending option down the field. Would actually be pretty hard to stop if mastered, but you'd also have like 6 fumbles/game.
    Nothing like seeing nine defenders on the line of scrimmage
    In theory, you could still run a normal offense, but instead of going into contact the runner would look to offload to backs trained to follow and flank.

    At it's best it would be Boise state vs Oklahoma. At it's worst it would be Reggie Bush vs Texas in the natty.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,754 Founders Club

    Doogles said:

    If teams can line up with 5 wide receivers, why can't UW line up with 5 running backs. Why not revolutionize the game.

    You could have a backline like rugby.


    If you taught players to run trailers on every play you would have a never ending option down the field. Would actually be pretty hard to stop if mastered, but you'd also have like 6 fumbles/game.
    Nothing like seeing nine defenders on the line of scrimmage
    We played a 6-3 defense in 9th grade. 2 deep
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 69,920 Founders Club

    Doogles said:

    If teams can line up with 5 wide receivers, why can't UW line up with 5 running backs. Why not revolutionize the game.

    You could have a backline like rugby.


    If you taught players to run trailers on every play you would have a never ending option down the field. Would actually be pretty hard to stop if mastered, but you'd also have like 6 fumbles/game.
    Nothing like seeing nine defenders on the line of scrimmage
    We played a 6-3 defense in 9th grade. 2 deep
    In 7th grade we ran the "Bengal Blitz", sending all eleven defenders